These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21557128)

  • 1. Short-term monitoring of formaldehyde: comparison of two direct-reading instruments to a laboratory-based method.
    Hirst DV; Gressel MG; Flanders WD
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2011 Jun; 8(6):357-63. PubMed ID: 21557128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Field precision of formaldehyde sampling and analysis using NIOSH method 3500.
    Akbar-Khanzadeh F; Park CK
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1997 Sep; 58(9):657-60. PubMed ID: 9291564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Laboratory and field validation of the GC-NPD method for the measurement of formaldehyde in the workplace.
    Jeong JY; Paik NW
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2005 Apr; 2(4):244-50. PubMed ID: 15788386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of a direct-reading device to gravimetric methods for evaluating organic dust aerosols in an enclosed swine production environment.
    Taylor CD; Reynolds SJ
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2001 Jan; 16(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 11202031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Correcting diacetyl concentrations from air samples collected with NIOSH method 2557.
    Cox-Ganser J; Ganser G; Saito R; Hobbs G; Boylstein R; Hendricks W; Simmons M; Eide M; Kullman G; Piacitelli C
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2011 Feb; 8(2):59-70. PubMed ID: 21229454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Formaldehyde exposure in U.S. industries from OSHA air sampling data.
    Lavoue J; Vincent R; Gerin M
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2008 Sep; 5(9):575-87. PubMed ID: 18618336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Formaldehyde: a comparative evaluation of four monitoring methods.
    Coyne LB; Cook RE; Mann JR; Bouyoucos S; McDonald OF; Baldwin CL
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1985 Oct; 46(10):609-19. PubMed ID: 4061291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Methods used by the United States National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health to monitor crystalline silica.
    Lorberau CD; Abell MT
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 1995; 21 Suppl 2():35-8. PubMed ID: 8929686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Characterizing formaldehyde emission rates in a gross anatomy laboratory.
    Keil CB; Akbar-Khanzadeh F; Konecny KA
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2001 Oct; 16(10):967-72. PubMed ID: 11599546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison between active (pumped) and passive (diffusive) sampling methods for formaldehyde in pathology and histology laboratories.
    Lee EG; Magrm R; Kusti M; Kashon ML; Guffey S; Costas MM; Boykin CJ; Harper M
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2017 Jan; 14(1):31-39. PubMed ID: 27715715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of formaldehyde exposure levels in two multi-industry occupational exposure databanks using multimodel inference.
    Lavoué J; Gérin M; Vincent R
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2011 Jan; 8(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 21154107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Monitoring of formaldehyde in air.
    Balmat JL; Meadows GW
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1985 Oct; 46(10):578-84. PubMed ID: 4061288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Field evaluation of a transportable open-path FTIR spectrometer for real-time air monitoring.
    Ross KR; Todd LA
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2002 Feb; 17(2):131-43. PubMed ID: 11843199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the Du Pont Pro-Tek Formaldehyde Badge and the 3M Formaldehyde Monitor.
    Kennedy ER; Hull RD
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1986 Feb; 47(2):94-105. PubMed ID: 3953425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of sampling methods for monomer and polyisocyanates of 1,6-hexamethylene diisocyanate during spray finishing operations.
    England E; Key-Schwartz R; Lesage J; Carlton G; Streicher R; Song R
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 2000 Jun; 15(6):472-8. PubMed ID: 10853287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of real-time techniques to measure hydrogen peroxide in air at the permissible exposure limit.
    Puskar MA; Plese MR
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1996 Sep; 57(9):843-8. PubMed ID: 8865593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Performance testing of NIOSH Method 5524/ASTM Method D-7049-04, for determination of metalworking fluids.
    Glaser R; Kurimo R; Shulman S
    J Occup Environ Hyg; 2007 Aug; 4(8):583-95. PubMed ID: 17577749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An evaluation of the effect of source and concentration on three methods for the measurement of formaldehyde in indoor air.
    Beck SW; Stock TH
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1990 Jan; 51(1):14-21; discussion 22. PubMed ID: 2301250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of a portable X-ray fluorescence instrument for the determination of lead in workplace air samples.
    Morley JC; Clark CS; Deddens JA; Ashley K; Roda S
    Appl Occup Environ Hyg; 1999 May; 14(5):306-16. PubMed ID: 10446483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Laboratory and field validation of a JXC charcoal sampling and analytical method for monitoring short-term exposures to ethylene oxide.
    Puskar MA; Nowak JL; Hecker LH
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1988 May; 49(5):237-43. PubMed ID: 3400587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.