628 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21557708)
1. Cetuximab in the treatment of patients with colorectal cancer.
Garrett CR; Eng C
Expert Opin Biol Ther; 2011 Jul; 11(7):937-49. PubMed ID: 21557708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. PTEN expression and KRAS mutations on primary tumors and metastases in the prediction of benefit from cetuximab plus irinotecan for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Loupakis F; Pollina L; Stasi I; Ruzzo A; Scartozzi M; Santini D; Masi G; Graziano F; Cremolini C; Rulli E; Canestrari E; Funel N; Schiavon G; Petrini I; Magnani M; Tonini G; Campani D; Floriani I; Cascinu S; Falcone A
J Clin Oncol; 2009 Jun; 27(16):2622-9. PubMed ID: 19398573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan plus cetuximab treatment and RAS mutations in colorectal cancer.
Van Cutsem E; Lenz HJ; Köhne CH; Heinemann V; Tejpar S; Melezínek I; Beier F; Stroh C; Rougier P; van Krieken JH; Ciardiello F
J Clin Oncol; 2015 Mar; 33(7):692-700. PubMed ID: 25605843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predictive and prognostic factors in the complex treatment of patients with colorectal cancer.
László L
Magy Onkol; 2010 Dec; 54(4):383-94. PubMed ID: 21163770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Randomized phase III study of panitumumab with fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) compared with FOLFIRI alone as second-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Peeters M; Price TJ; Cervantes A; Sobrero AF; Ducreux M; Hotko Y; André T; Chan E; Lordick F; Punt CJ; Strickland AH; Wilson G; Ciuleanu TE; Roman L; Van Cutsem E; Tzekova V; Collins S; Oliner KS; Rong A; Gansert J
J Clin Oncol; 2010 Nov; 28(31):4706-13. PubMed ID: 20921462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The role of KRAS mutations in predicting the efficacy of cetuximab-plus-irinotecan therapy in irinotecan-refractory Korean metastatic colorectal cancer patients.
Sohn BS; Kim TW; Lee JL; Ryu MH; Chang HM; Kang YK; Park HS; Na YS; Jang SJ; Kim JC; Lee JS
Oncology; 2009; 77(3-4):224-30. PubMed ID: 19738388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cetuximab plus capecitabine and irinotecan compared with cetuximab plus capecitabine and oxaliplatin as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: AIO KRK-0104--a randomized trial of the German AIO CRC study group.
Moosmann N; von Weikersthal LF; Vehling-Kaiser U; Stauch M; Hass HG; Dietzfelbinger H; Oruzio D; Klein S; Zellmann K; Decker T; Schulze M; Abenhardt W; Puchtler G; Kappauf H; Mittermüller J; Haberl C; Schalhorn A; Jung A; Stintzing S; Heinemann V
J Clin Oncol; 2011 Mar; 29(8):1050-8. PubMed ID: 21300933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dual targeting of the epidermal growth factor receptor using the combination of cetuximab and erlotinib: preclinical evaluation and results of the phase II DUX study in chemotherapy-refractory, advanced colorectal cancer.
Weickhardt AJ; Price TJ; Chong G; Gebski V; Pavlakis N; Johns TG; Azad A; Skrinos E; Fluck K; Dobrovic A; Salemi R; Scott AM; Mariadason JM; Tebbutt NC
J Clin Oncol; 2012 May; 30(13):1505-12. PubMed ID: 22412142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Combined assessment of epidermal [corrected] growth factor receptor dual color in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry with downstream gene mutations in prediction of response to the anti-EGFR therapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Takahashi N; Yamada Y; Taniguchi H; Honma Y; Iwasa S; Kato K; Hamaguchi T; Shimada Y
Arch Med Res; 2014 Jul; 45(5):366-74. PubMed ID: 24830936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Phase II trial of cetuximab plus irinotecan for oxaliplatin- and irinotecan-based chemotherapy-refractory patients with advanced and/or metastatic colorectal cancer: evaluation of efficacy and safety based on KRAS mutation status (T-CORE0801).
Soeda H; Shimodaira H; Gamoh M; Ando H; Isobe H; Suto T; Takahashi S; Kakudo Y; Amagai K; Mori T; Watanabe M; Yamaguchi T; Kato S; Ishioka C
Oncology; 2014; 87(1):7-20. PubMed ID: 24968756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Activating KRAS mutations and overexpression of epidermal growth factor receptor as independent predictors in metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with cetuximab.
Yen LC; Uen YH; Wu DC; Lu CY; Yu FJ; Wu IC; Lin SR; Wang JY
Ann Surg; 2010 Feb; 251(2):254-60. PubMed ID: 20010090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cetuximab plus irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: updated analysis of overall survival according to tumor KRAS and BRAF mutation status.
Van Cutsem E; Köhne CH; Láng I; Folprecht G; Nowacki MP; Cascinu S; Shchepotin I; Maurel J; Cunningham D; Tejpar S; Schlichting M; Zubel A; Celik I; Rougier P; Ciardiello F
J Clin Oncol; 2011 May; 29(15):2011-9. PubMed ID: 21502544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The importance of KRAS mutations and EGF61A>G polymorphism to the effect of cetuximab and irinotecan in metastatic colorectal cancer.
Garm Spindler KL; Pallisgaard N; Rasmussen AA; Lindebjerg J; Andersen RF; Crüger D; Jakobsen A
Ann Oncol; 2009 May; 20(5):879-84. PubMed ID: 19179548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analysis of PTEN, BRAF, and EGFR status in determining benefit from cetuximab therapy in wild-type KRAS metastatic colon cancer.
Laurent-Puig P; Cayre A; Manceau G; Buc E; Bachet JB; Lecomte T; Rougier P; Lievre A; Landi B; Boige V; Ducreux M; Ychou M; Bibeau F; Bouché O; Reid J; Stone S; Penault-Llorca F
J Clin Oncol; 2009 Dec; 27(35):5924-30. PubMed ID: 19884556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of Fc{gamma}RIIa-Fc{gamma}RIIIa polymorphisms and KRAS mutations on the clinical outcome of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab plus irinotecan.
Bibeau F; Lopez-Crapez E; Di Fiore F; Thezenas S; Ychou M; Blanchard F; Lamy A; Penault-Llorca F; Frébourg T; Michel P; Sabourin JC; Boissière-Michot F
J Clin Oncol; 2009 Mar; 27(7):1122-9. PubMed ID: 19164213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bevacizumab in combination with cetuximab and irinotecan after failure of cetuximab and irinotecan in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.
Larsen FO; Pfeiffer P; Nielsen D; Skougaard K; Qvortrup C; Vistisen K; Fromm AL; Jørgensen TL; Bjerregaard JK; Hoegdall E; Jensen BV
Acta Oncol; 2011 May; 50(4):574-7. PubMed ID: 21529301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Wild-type BRAF is required for response to panitumumab or cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer.
Di Nicolantonio F; Martini M; Molinari F; Sartore-Bianchi A; Arena S; Saletti P; De Dosso S; Mazzucchelli L; Frattini M; Siena S; Bardelli A
J Clin Oncol; 2008 Dec; 26(35):5705-12. PubMed ID: 19001320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prospective analysis of KRAS wild-type patients with metastatic colorectal cancer using cetuximab plus FOLFIRI or FOLFOX4 treatment regimens.
Huang MY; Chen MJ; Tsai HL; Kuo CH; Ma CJ; Hou MF; Chuang SC; Lin SR; Wang JY
Genet Mol Res; 2011 Oct; 10(4):3002-12. PubMed ID: 21968808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. PIK3CA mutations are not a major determinant of resistance to the epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer.
Prenen H; De Schutter J; Jacobs B; De Roock W; Biesmans B; Claes B; Lambrechts D; Van Cutsem E; Tejpar S
Clin Cancer Res; 2009 May; 15(9):3184-8. PubMed ID: 19366826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The efficacy and safety of panitumumab administered concomitantly with FOLFIRI or Irinotecan in second-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: the secondary analysis from STEPP (Skin Toxicity Evaluation Protocol With Panitumumab) by KRAS status.
Mitchell EP; Piperdi B; Lacouture ME; Shearer H; Iannotti N; Pillai MV; Xu F; Yassine M
Clin Colorectal Cancer; 2011 Dec; 10(4):333-9. PubMed ID: 22000810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
