198 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21558521)
1. Vaccine liability in the Supreme Court: forging a social compact.
Kraemer JD; Gostin LO
JAMA; 2011 May; 305(18):1900-1. PubMed ID: 21558521
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act and the supreme court's interpretation.
Blake V
Virtual Mentor; 2012 Jan; 14(1):31-4. PubMed ID: 23116914
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Safety, supply, and suits--litigation and the vaccine industry.
Kesselheim A
N Engl J Med; 2011 Apr; 364(16):1485-7. PubMed ID: 21506740
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Reasons for an injury compensation programme for adverse vaccine-related events in Spain].
Tuells J
Med Clin (Barc); 2013 Jun; 140(12):554-7. PubMed ID: 23540383
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Bad medicine: prescription drugs, preemption, and the potential for a no-fault fix.
Smirniotopoulos A
Rev Law Soc Change; 2012; 35(4):793-862. PubMed ID: 22363960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Good law from tragic facts--Congress, the FDA, and preemption.
Annas GJ
N Engl J Med; 2009 Sep; 361(12):1206-11. PubMed ID: 19759383
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The Cutter incident, 50 years later.
Offit PA
N Engl J Med; 2005 Apr; 352(14):1411-2. PubMed ID: 15814877
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. National vaccine injury compensation program: calculation of average cost of a health insurance policy. Final rule.
Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), HHS
Fed Regist; 2007 Jul; 72(128):36610-2. PubMed ID: 17674490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Vaccine-damage damage.
Nature; 1985 Aug 8-14; 316(6028):472. PubMed ID: 4033747
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Dodging a bullet. Rulings limit punitive damages, uphold arbitration.
Benko LB
Mod Healthc; 2003 Apr; 33(15):20. PubMed ID: 12723275
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Revisiting Factor VIII cases: is it time for an agency adjudication system?
Su YC
Food Drug Law J; 2008; 63(4):943-61. PubMed ID: 19601390
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. ERISA's second wind: the U.S. Supreme Court's recent decision in Aetna v Davila is a victory for health plans, but payers, providers must still negotiate potential mine fields.
Manzanares J; Mandell J
Healthc Leadersh Rep; 2004 Dec; 12(12):1-7. PubMed ID: 15771201
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. When vaccine injury claims go to court.
Stewart AM
N Engl J Med; 2009 Jun; 360(24):2498-500. PubMed ID: 19516030
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Court rules generic drug companies not responsible for adverse outcomes.
Kouros N
Monash Bioeth Rev; 2013 Sep; 31(2):23-4. PubMed ID: 24844072
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. High court to review arbitration ruling in RICO suit against HMOs.
Health Care Law Mon; 2002 Nov; ():8-10. PubMed ID: 12498020
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Anticipating the impact of Bruesewitz v. Wyeth on Vaccine And Medical Countermeasure Injury Compensation And Availability.
Courtney B; Morhard R
Biosecur Bioterror; 2010 Dec; 8(4):315-20. PubMed ID: 21142760
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. On access and accountability--two Supreme Court rulings on generic drugs.
Boumil MM; Curfman GD
N Engl J Med; 2013 Aug; 369(8):696-7. PubMed ID: 23923990
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The Supreme Court, preemption, and malpractice liability.
Kesselheim AS; Studdert DM
N Engl J Med; 2009 Feb; 360(6):559-61. PubMed ID: 19196672
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Rationalizing vaccine injury compensation.
Mello MM
Bioethics; 2008 Jan; 22(1):32-42. PubMed ID: 18154587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. How to remedy possible harm to a few persons from vaccines that could benefit entire society?
Check WA
JAMA; 1984 Dec; 252(21):2942-6. PubMed ID: 6502848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
