These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21559060)

  • 1. A comparison of wound area measurement techniques: visitrak versus photography.
    Chang AC; Dearman B; Greenwood JE
    Eplasty; 2011 Apr; 11():e18. PubMed ID: 21559060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ways to increase precision and accuracy of wound area measurement using smart devices: Advanced app Planimator.
    Foltynski P
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0192485. PubMed ID: 29505569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A study of the efficiency and convenience of an advanced portable Wound Measurement System (VISITRAK).
    Sugama J; Matsui Y; Sanada H; Konya C; Okuwa M; Kitagawa A
    J Clin Nurs; 2007 Jul; 16(7):1265-9. PubMed ID: 17584344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A new smartphone-based method for wound area measurement.
    Foltynski P; Ladyzynski P; Wojcicki JM
    Artif Organs; 2014 Apr; 38(4):346-52. PubMed ID: 24102380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy and precision of selected wound area measurement methods in diabetic foot ulceration.
    Foltynski P; Ladyzynski P; Sabalinska S; Wojcicki JM
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2013 Aug; 15(8):712-21. PubMed ID: 23902402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Wound Area Measurement with Digital Planimetry: Improved Accuracy and Precision with Calibration Based on 2 Rulers.
    Foltynski P; Ladyzynski P; Ciechanowska A; Migalska-Musial K; Judzewicz G; Sabalinska S
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(8):e0134622. PubMed ID: 26252747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Wound measurement comparing the use of acetate tracings and Visitrak digital planimetry.
    Gethin G; Cowman S
    J Clin Nurs; 2006 Apr; 15(4):422-7. PubMed ID: 16553755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. ImageJ: A Free, Easy, and Reliable Method to Measure Leg Ulcers Using Digital Pictures.
    Aragón-Sánchez J; Quintana-Marrero Y; Aragón-Hernández C; Hernández-Herero MJ
    Int J Low Extrem Wounds; 2017 Dec; 16(4):269-273. PubMed ID: 29251541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Smartphone application for wound area measurement in clinical practice.
    Biagioni RB; Carvalho BV; Manzioni R; Matielo MF; Brochado Neto FC; Sacilotto R
    J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech; 2021 Jun; 7(2):258-261. PubMed ID: 33997567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reliability of electronic versus manual wound measurement techniques.
    Haghpanah S; Bogie K; Wang X; Banks PG; Ho CH
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2006 Oct; 87(10):1396-402. PubMed ID: 17023252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A novel and accurate technique of photographic wound measurement.
    Shetty R; Sreekar H; Lamba S; Gupta AK
    Indian J Plast Surg; 2012 May; 45(2):425-9. PubMed ID: 23162244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Wound debridement: Comparative reliability of three methods for measuring fibrin percentage in chronic wounds.
    Laplaud AL; Blaizot X; Gaillard C; Morice A; Lebreuilly I; Clément C; Parienti JJ; Dompmartin A
    Wound Repair Regen; 2010; 18(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 20082676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Digital photography and transparency-based methods for measuring wound surface area.
    Bhedi A; Saxena AK; Gadani R; Patel R
    Indian J Surg; 2013 Apr; 75(2):111-4. PubMed ID: 24426404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Three-dimensional digital imaging is as accurate and reliable to measure leg ulcer area as transparent tracing with digital planimetry.
    Chaby G; Lok C; Thirion JP; Lucien A; Senet P
    J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord; 2017 Nov; 5(6):837-843. PubMed ID: 29037356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reliability of photographic analysis of wound epithelialization assessed in human skin graft donor sites and epidermolysis bullosa wounds.
    Rennekampff HO; Fimmers R; Metelmann HR; Schumann H; Tenenhaus M
    Trials; 2015 May; 16():235. PubMed ID: 26018577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measurements of linear dimensions on fundus photographs: comparison between photographic film and digital systems.
    Musadiq M; Patsoura E; Hughes S; Yang YC
    Eye (Lond); 2003 Jul; 17(5):619-22. PubMed ID: 12855971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Wound Measurement Techniques: Comparing the Use of Ruler Method, 2D Imaging and 3D Scanner.
    Shah A; Wollak C; Shah JB
    J Am Coll Clin Wound Spec; 2013 Dec; 5(3):52-7. PubMed ID: 26199893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Digital imaging: an accurate and easy method of measuring foot ulcers.
    Rajbhandari SM; Harris ND; Sutton M; Lockett C; Eaton S; Gadour M; Tesfaye S; Ward JD
    Diabet Med; 1999 Apr; 16(4):339-42. PubMed ID: 10220209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Wounds measured from digital photographs using photodigital planimetry software: validation and rater reliability.
    Wendelken ME; Berg WT; Lichtenstein P; Markowitz L; Comfort C; Alvarez OM
    Wounds; 2011 Sep; 23(9):267-75. PubMed ID: 25879267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Wound areas by computerized planimetry of digital images: accuracy and reliability.
    Mayrovitz HN; Soontupe LB
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2009 May; 22(5):222-9. PubMed ID: 19521289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.