219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21559983)
1. Reconstruction of karyotype evolution in core Glires. I. The genome homology revealed by comparative chromosome painting.
Beklemisheva VR; Romanenko SA; Biltueva LS; Trifonov VA; Vorobieva NV; Serdukova NA; Rubtsova NV; Brandler OV; O'Brien PC; Yang F; Stanyon R; Ferguson-Smith MA; Graphodatsky AS
Chromosome Res; 2011 May; 19(4):549-65. PubMed ID: 21559983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evolution of genome organizations of squirrels (Sciuridae) revealed by cross-species chromosome painting.
Li T; O'Brien PC; Biltueva L; Fu B; Wang J; Nie W; Ferguson-Smith MA; Graphodatsky AS; Yang F
Chromosome Res; 2004; 12(4):317-35. PubMed ID: 15241012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Low, complex and probably reticulated chromosome evolution of Sciuromorpha (Rodentia) and Lagomorpha.
Richard F; Dutrillaux B
Cytogenet Genome Res; 2012; 137(2-4):218-32. PubMed ID: 22846378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Genome-wide comparative chromosome map between human and the Forrest's pika (Ochotona forresti) established by cross-species chromosome painting: further support for the Glires hypothesis.
Ye J; Nie W; Wang J; Su W; Jing M; Graphodatsky AS; Yang F
Cytogenet Genome Res; 2011; 132(1-2):41-6. PubMed ID: 20664243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Karyotypic evolution of the family Sciuridae: inferences from the genome organizations of ground squirrels.
Li T; Wang J; Su W; Nie W; Yang F
Cytogenet Genome Res; 2006; 112(3-4):270-6. PubMed ID: 16484783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Conserved although very different karyotypes in Gliridae and Sciuridae and their contribution to chromosomal signatures in Glires.
Sannier J; Gerbault-Seureau M; Dutrillaux B; Richard FA
Cytogenet Genome Res; 2011; 134(1):51-63. PubMed ID: 21430366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reciprocal chromosome painting shows that squirrels, unlike murid rodents, have a highly conserved genome organization.
Stanyon R; Stone G; Garcia M; Froenicke L
Genomics; 2003 Aug; 82(2):245-9. PubMed ID: 12837274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Chromosome painting refines the history of genome evolution in hares and rabbits (order Lagomorpha).
Robinson TJ; Yang F; Harrison WR
Cytogenet Genome Res; 2002; 96(1-4):223-7. PubMed ID: 12438803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative cytogenetics of hamsters of the genus Allocricetulus argyropulo 1932 (Cricetidae, Rodentia).
Romanenko SA; Lebedev VS; Serdukova NA; Feoktistova NY; Surov AV; Graphodatsky AS
Cytogenet Genome Res; 2013; 139(4):258-66. PubMed ID: 23328385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Chromosome painting in Tragulidae facilitates the reconstruction of Ruminantia ancestral karyotype.
Kulemzina AI; Yang F; Trifonov VA; Ryder OA; Ferguson-Smith MA; Graphodatsky AS
Chromosome Res; 2011 May; 19(4):531-9. PubMed ID: 21445689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Tracking genome organization in rodents by Zoo-FISH.
Graphodatsky AS; Yang F; Dobigny G; Romanenko SA; Biltueva LS; Perelman PL; Beklemisheva VR; Alkalaeva EZ; Serdukova NA; Ferguson-Smith MA; Murphy WJ; Robinson TJ
Chromosome Res; 2008; 16(2):261-74. PubMed ID: 18266061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative chromosome painting in Aotus reveals a highly derived evolution.
Ruiz-Herrera A; García F; Aguilera M; Garcia M; Ponsà Fontanals M
Am J Primatol; 2005 Jan; 65(1):73-85. PubMed ID: 15645457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Chromosomal rearrangements and karyotype evolution in carnivores revealed by chromosome painting.
Nie W; Wang J; Su W; Wang D; Tanomtong A; Perelman PL; Graphodatsky AS; Yang F
Heredity (Edinb); 2012 Jan; 108(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 22086079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Karyotype evolution and phylogenetic relationships of hamsters (Cricetidae, Muroidea, Rodentia) inferred from chromosomal painting and banding comparison.
Romanenko SA; Volobouev VT; Perelman PL; Lebedev VS; Serdukova NA; Trifonov VA; Biltueva LS; Nie W; O'Brien PC; Bulatova NSh; Ferguson-Smith MA; Yang F; Graphodatsky AS
Chromosome Res; 2007; 15(3):283-97. PubMed ID: 17333534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Chromosomal evolution of Arvicolinae (Cricetidae, Rodentia). III. Karyotype relationships of ten Microtus species.
Lemskaya NA; Romanenko SA; Golenishchev FN; Rubtsova NV; Sablina OV; Serdukova NA; O'Brien PC; Fu B; Yiğit N; Ferguson-Smith MA; Yang F; Graphodatsky AS
Chromosome Res; 2010 Jun; 18(4):459-71. PubMed ID: 20379801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Comparative cytogenetics of rodents].
Romanenko SA; Lemskaia NA; Beklemisheva VR; Perel'man PL; Serdiukova NA; Grafodatskiĭ AS
Genetika; 2010 Sep; 46(9):1285-9. PubMed ID: 21061636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative chromosome painting of pronghorn (Antilocapra americana) and saola (Pseudoryx nghetinhensis) karyotypes with human and dromedary camel probes.
Kulemzina AI; Perelman PL; Grafodatskaya DA; Nguyen TT; Thompson M; Roelke-Parker ME; Graphodatsky AS
BMC Genet; 2014 Jun; 15():68. PubMed ID: 24923361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Defining the ancestral eutherian karyotype: a cladistic interpretation of chromosome painting and genome sequence assembly data.
Robinson TJ; Ruiz-Herrera A
Chromosome Res; 2008; 16(8):1133-41. PubMed ID: 19067196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Karyotype evolution of eulipotyphla (insectivora): the genome homology of seven sorex species revealed by comparative chromosome painting and banding data.
Biltueva L; Vorobieva N; Perelman P; Trifonov V; Volobouev V; Panov V; Ilyashenko V; Onischenko S; O'Brien P; Yang F; Ferguson-Smith M; Graphodatsky A
Cytogenet Genome Res; 2011; 135(1):51-64. PubMed ID: 21912114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Chromosome banding pattern relationships of hares, rabbits, and pikas (order Lagomorpha). A phyletic interpretation.
Stock AD
Cytogenet Cell Genet; 1976; 17(2):78-88. PubMed ID: 975938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
