BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21560813)

  • 1. Geometry and fusion of aortic valves from pulsatile flow ventricular assist device patients.
    May-Newman K; Mendoza A; Abulon DJ; Joshi M; Kunda A; Dembitsky W
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2011 Mar; 20(2):149-58. PubMed ID: 21560813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pathology in patients with ventricular assist devices: a study of 21 autopsies, 24 ventricular apical core biopsies and 24 explanted hearts.
    Rose AG; Park SJ
    Cardiovasc Pathol; 2005; 14(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 15710287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biomechanics of the aortic valve in the continuous flow VAD-assisted heart.
    May-Newman K; Enriquez-Almaguer L; Posuwattanakul P; Dembitsky W
    ASAIO J; 2010; 56(4):301-8. PubMed ID: 20559132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fusion of aortic valve commissures in patients supported by a continuous axial flow left ventricular assist device.
    Mudd JO; Cuda JD; Halushka M; Soderlund KA; Conte JV; Russell SD
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 2008 Dec; 27(12):1269-74. PubMed ID: 19059105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ventricular assist device in patients with prosthetic heart valves.
    Mokashi SA; Schmitto JD; Lee LS; Rawn JD; Bolman RM; Shekar PS; Couper GS; Chen FY
    Artif Organs; 2010 Nov; 34(11):1030-4. PubMed ID: 21137108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pathological analysis of the aortic valve after long-term left ventricular assist device support.
    Hata H; Fujita T; Ishibashi-Ueda H; Nakatani T; Kobayashi J
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2014 Aug; 46(2):193-7. PubMed ID: 24335262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Aortic valve pathophysiology during left ventricular assist device support.
    John R; Mantz K; Eckman P; Rose A; May-Newman K
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 2010 Dec; 29(12):1321-9. PubMed ID: 20674397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Analysis of aortic valve commissural fusion after support with continuous-flow left ventricular assist device.
    Martina JR; Schipper ME; de Jonge N; Ramjankhan F; de Weger RA; Lahpor JR; Vink A
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2013 Oct; 17(4):616-24. PubMed ID: 23798641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessing options for the small aortic root.
    Petracek MR
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Jan; 11 Suppl 1():S50-5. PubMed ID: 11843521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is native aortic valve commissural fusion in patients with long-term left ventricular assist devices associated with clinically important aortic insufficiency?
    Letsou GV; Connelly JH; Delgado RM; Myers TJ; Gregoric ID; Smart FW; Frazier OH
    J Heart Lung Transplant; 2006 Apr; 25(4):395-9. PubMed ID: 16563967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The influence of ventricular input impedance on the hydrodynamic performance of bioprosthetic aortic roots in vitro.
    Jennings LM; Butterfield M; Walker PG; Watterson KG; Fisher J
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Mar; 10(2):269-75. PubMed ID: 11297215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Successful use of continuous flow ventricular assist device in a patient with mechanical mitral and aortic valve prosthesis without replacement or exclusion of valves.
    Krishan K; Pinney S; Anyanwu AC
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2010 Feb; 10(2):325-7. PubMed ID: 19948537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Aortic and mitral valve replacement with reconstruction of the intervalvular fibrous body: an analysis of clinical outcomes.
    De Oliveira NC; David TE; Armstrong S; Ivanov J
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Feb; 129(2):286-90. PubMed ID: 15678037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Vascular pulsatility in patients with a pulsatile- or continuous-flow ventricular assist device.
    Travis AR; Giridharan GA; Pantalos GM; Dowling RD; Prabhu SD; Slaughter MS; Sobieski M; Undar A; Farrar DJ; Koenig SC
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 Feb; 133(2):517-24. PubMed ID: 17258591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Problems in patients with use of a ventricular assist device].
    Nishimura K; Yamazato A; Aoshima M; Fukumasu H; Kubo S; Hirata K; Okabayashi H; Nomoto S; Okamoto Y; Ban T
    J Cardiol; 1990; 20(2):473-82. PubMed ID: 2104421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pathological analysis of nonstented Freestyle aortic root bioprostheses treated with amino oleic acid.
    Fyfe BS; Schoen FJ
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1999 Oct; 11(4 Suppl 1):151-6. PubMed ID: 10660184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of aortic valve incompetence on the hemodynamics of a continuous flow ventricular assist device in a mock circulation.
    Zamarripa Garcia MA; Enriquez LA; Dembitsky W; May-Newman K
    ASAIO J; 2008; 54(3):237-44. PubMed ID: 18496272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pathologic findings in explanted clinical bioprosthetic valves fabricated from photooxidized bovine pericardium.
    Schoen FJ
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Mar; 7(2):174-9. PubMed ID: 9587858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A temporarily stented, autologous pericardial aortic valve prosthesis.
    Goetz WA; Lim HS; Lansac E; Weber PA; Duran CM
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Sep; 11(5):696-702. PubMed ID: 12358407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inflammation and infection in nine surgically explanted Medtronic Freestyle stentless aortic valves.
    Butany J; Zhou T; Leong SW; Cunningham KS; Thangaroopan M; Jegatheeswaran A; Feindel C; David TE
    Cardiovasc Pathol; 2007; 16(5):258-67. PubMed ID: 17868876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.