186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21560880)
1. EHR adoption and use. Results from the 2010 Minnesota ambulatory clinic survey.
Guida K; LaVenture M
Minn Med; 2011 Apr; 94(4):33-6. PubMed ID: 21560880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Minnesota clinics' adoption, use and exchange of electronic health information.
Soderberg K; Laventure M
Minn Med; 2013 Sep; 96(9):45-8. PubMed ID: 24494362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Measuring use of electronic health record functionality using system audit information.
Bowes WA
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2010; 160(Pt 1):86-90. PubMed ID: 20841655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Measurement of the utilization of an installed electronic health record.
Dullabh P; Moiduddin A; Babalola E
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2010; 160(Pt 1):81-5. PubMed ID: 20841654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hospitals ineligible for federal meaningful-use incentives have dismally low rates of adoption of electronic health records.
Wolf L; Harvell J; Jha AK
Health Aff (Millwood); 2012 Mar; 31(3):505-13. PubMed ID: 22392661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Physician experiences transitioning between an older versus newer electronic health record for electronic prescribing.
Abramson EL; Patel V; Malhotra S; Pfoh ER; Nena Osorio S; Cheriff A; Cole CL; Bunce A; Ash J; Kaushal R
Int J Med Inform; 2012 Aug; 81(8):539-48. PubMed ID: 22465355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Adoption of electronic health records in Korean tertiary teaching and general hospitals.
Yoon D; Chang BC; Kang SW; Bae H; Park RW
Int J Med Inform; 2012 Mar; 81(3):196-203. PubMed ID: 22206619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Exploring the business case for ambulatory electronic health record system adoption.
Song PH; McAlearney AS; Robbins J; McCullough JS
J Healthc Manag; 2011; 56(3):169-80; discussion 181-2. PubMed ID: 21714372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A business case for HIT adoption: effects of "meaningful use" EHR financial incentives on clinic revenue.
Behkami NA; Dorr DA; Morrice S
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2010; 160(Pt 1):779-83. PubMed ID: 20841792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Adopting an electronic health record. Keys to success.
Arneson T
Minn Med; 2005 Oct; 88(10):52-4. PubMed ID: 16477759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Office-based physicians are responding to incentives and assistance by adopting and using electronic health records.
Hsiao CJ; Jha AK; King J; Patel V; Furukawa MF; Mostashari F
Health Aff (Millwood); 2013 Aug; 32(8):1470-7. PubMed ID: 23840050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prevalence and functionality of electronic health records in internal medicine continuity clinics.
Reddy SG; Babbott SF; Beasley BW; Nadkarni MM; Gertner EJ; Holmboe ES
Acad Med; 2010 Aug; 85(8):1369-77. PubMed ID: 20453813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Adoption of electronic health records grows rapidly, but fewer than half of US hospitals had at least a basic system in 2012.
DesRoches CM; Charles D; Furukawa MF; Joshi MS; Kralovec P; Mostashari F; Worzala C; Jha AK
Health Aff (Millwood); 2013 Aug; 32(8):1478-85. PubMed ID: 23840052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Health information exchange: participation by Minnesota primary care practices.
Fontaine P; Zink T; Boyle RG; Kralewski J
Arch Intern Med; 2010 Apr; 170(7):622-9. PubMed ID: 20386006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Small, nonteaching, and rural hospitals continue to be slow in adopting electronic health record systems.
DesRoches CM; Worzala C; Joshi MS; Kralovec PD; Jha AK
Health Aff (Millwood); 2012 May; 31(5):1092-9. PubMed ID: 22535503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Physician productivity and the ambulatory EHR in a large academic multi-specialty physician group.
Cheriff AD; Kapur AG; Qiu M; Cole CL
Int J Med Inform; 2010 Jul; 79(7):492-500. PubMed ID: 20478738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A conceptual framework for analyzing how Canadian physicians are using electronic medical records in clinical care.
Paterson G; Shaw N; Grant A; Leonard K; Delisle E; Mitchell S; McCarrey M; Pascal B; Kraetschmer N
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2010; 160(Pt 1):141-5. PubMed ID: 20841666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hospital electronic health information exchange grew substantially in 2008-12.
Furukawa MF; Patel V; Charles D; Swain M; Mostashari F
Health Aff (Millwood); 2013 Aug; 32(8):1346-54. PubMed ID: 23918477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Key Factors Affecting the Adoption of Telemedicine by Ambulatory Clinics: Insights from a Statewide Survey.
Ranganathan C; Balaji S
Telemed J E Health; 2020 Feb; 26(2):218-225. PubMed ID: 30874484
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of Variation in Electronic Health Record Capabilities and Reported Clinical Quality Performance in Ambulatory Care Clinics, 2014-2017.
Shekelle PG; Pane JD; Agniel D; Shi Y; Rumball-Smith J; Haas A; Fischer S; Rudin RS; Totten M; Lai J; Scanlon D; Damberg CL
JAMA Netw Open; 2021 Apr; 4(4):e217476. PubMed ID: 33885774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
