These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21561476)

  • 1. Early osseointegration to hydrophilic and hydrophobic implant surfaces in humans.
    Lang NP; Salvi GE; Huynh-Ba G; Ivanovski S; Donos N; Bosshardt DD
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Apr; 22(4):349-56. PubMed ID: 21561476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of bone debris in early healing adjacent to hydrophilic and hydrophobic implant surfaces in man.
    Bosshardt DD; Salvi GE; Huynh-Ba G; Ivanovski S; Donos N; Lang NP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Apr; 22(4):357-64. PubMed ID: 21561477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Gene expression profile of osseointegration of a hydrophilic compared with a hydrophobic microrough implant surface.
    Donos N; Hamlet S; Lang NP; Salvi GE; Huynh-Ba G; Bosshardt DD; Ivanovski S
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Apr; 22(4):365-72. PubMed ID: 21561478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The relative effect of surface strontium chemistry and super-hydrophilicity on the early osseointegration of moderately rough titanium surface in the rabbit femur.
    Park JW; Kwon TG; Suh JY
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Jun; 24(6):706-9. PubMed ID: 22409778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative histomorphometry and resonance frequency analysis of implants with moderately rough surfaces in a loaded animal model.
    Al-Nawas B; Groetz KA; Goetz H; Duschner H; Wagner W
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 17944964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bone regeneration at implants with turned or rough surfaces in self-contained defects. An experimental study in the dog.
    Botticelli D; Berglundh T; Persson LG; Lindhe J
    J Clin Periodontol; 2005 May; 32(5):448-55. PubMed ID: 15842258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of implant surface properties on peri-implant bone healing: a histological and histomorphometric study in dogs.
    Al-Hamdan K; Al-Moaber SH; Junker R; Jansen JA
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Apr; 22(4):399-405. PubMed ID: 21561482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Enhanced implant stability with a chemically modified SLA surface: a randomized pilot study.
    Oates TW; Valderrama P; Bischof M; Nedir R; Jones A; Simpson J; Toutenburg H; Cochran DL
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):755-60. PubMed ID: 17974109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bone apposition around two different sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implant surfaces: a histomorphometric study in canine mandibles.
    Bornstein MM; Valderrama P; Jones AA; Wilson TG; Seibl R; Cochran DL
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Mar; 19(3):233-41. PubMed ID: 18177427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Histomorphometric analysis of the osseointegration of four different implant surfaces in the femoral epiphyses of rabbits.
    Le Guehennec L; Goyenvalle E; Lopez-Heredia MA; Weiss P; Amouriq Y; Layrolle P
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Nov; 19(11):1103-10. PubMed ID: 18983312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Time sequence of bone healing around two implant systems in minipigs: preliminary histologic results.
    Carmagnola D; Abati S; Addis A; Ferrieri G; Chiapasco M; Romeo E; Vogel G
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2009 Oct; 29(5):549-55. PubMed ID: 19888499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Histological comparison of bone to implant contact in two types of dental implant surfaces: a single case study.
    Shibli JA; Feres M; de Figueiredo LC; Iezzi G; Piattelli A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Mar; 8(3):29-36. PubMed ID: 17351679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Improving osseointegration of dental implants.
    Elias CN; Meirelles L
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2010 Mar; 7(2):241-56. PubMed ID: 20214429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Factors influencing resonance frequency analysis assessed by Osstell mentor during implant tissue integration: II. Implant surface modifications and implant diameter.
    Han J; Lulic M; Lang NP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Jun; 21(6):605-11. PubMed ID: 20666787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Early loading of nonsubmerged titanium implants with a chemically modified sand-blasted and acid-etched surface: 6-month results of a prospective case series study in the posterior mandible focusing on peri-implant crestal bone changes and implant stability quotient (ISQ) values.
    Bornstein MM; Hart CN; Halbritter SA; Morton D; Buser D
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):338-47. PubMed ID: 19438966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Randomized clinical study of the peri-implant healing to hydrophilic and hydrophobic implant surfaces in patients receiving anticoagulants.
    Marković A; Đinić A; Calvo Guirado JL; Tahmaseb A; Šćepanović M; Janjić B
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2017 Oct; 28(10):1241-1247. PubMed ID: 27539149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Resonance frequency measurements in vivo and related surface properties of magnesium-incorporated, micropatterned and magnesium-incorporated TiUnite, Osseotite, SLA and TiOblast implants.
    Sul YT; Jönsson J; Yoon GS; Johansson C
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Oct; 20(10):1146-55. PubMed ID: 19719742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of immediate or delayed loading following immediate placement of implants with a modified surface.
    Liñares A; Mardas N; Dard M; Donos N
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Jan; 22(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 21039892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Early bone formation adjacent to rough and turned endosseous implant surfaces. An experimental study in the dog.
    Abrahamsson I; Berglundh T; Linder E; Lang NP; Lindhe J
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Aug; 15(4):381-92. PubMed ID: 15248872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Early loading after 21 days of healing of nonsubmerged titanium implants with a chemically modified sandblasted and acid-etched surface: two-year results of a prospective two-center study.
    Morton D; Bornstein MM; Wittneben JG; Martin WC; Ruskin JD; Hart CN; Buser D
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 Mar; 12(1):9-17. PubMed ID: 19744195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.