104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21561485)
1. Influence of various implant platform configurations on peri-implant tissue dimensions: an experimental study in dog.
Baffone GM; Botticelli D; Pantani F; Cardoso LC; Schweikert MT; Lang NP
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Apr; 22(4):438-44. PubMed ID: 21561485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of microgap location and configuration on peri-implant bone morphology in nonsubmerged implants: an experimental study in dogs.
Weng D; Nagata MJ; Bell M; de Melo LG; Bosco AF
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(3):540-7. PubMed ID: 20556253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Influence of interimplant distances and placement depth on peri-implant bone remodeling of adjacent and immediately loaded Morse cone connection implants: a histomorphometric study in dogs.
Barros RR; Novaes AB; Muglia VA; Iezzi G; Piattelli A
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Apr; 21(4):371-8. PubMed ID: 20128832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bone regeneration at implants with turned or rough surfaces in self-contained defects. An experimental study in the dog.
Botticelli D; Berglundh T; Persson LG; Lindhe J
J Clin Periodontol; 2005 May; 32(5):448-55. PubMed ID: 15842258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of immediate or delayed loading following immediate placement of implants with a modified surface.
Liñares A; Mardas N; Dard M; Donos N
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Jan; 22(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 21039892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Peri-implant bone reactions at delayed and immediately loaded implants: an experimental study.
Kim SH; Choi BH; Li J; Kim HS; Ko CY; Jeong SM; Xuan F; Lee SH
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Feb; 105(2):144-8. PubMed ID: 17764984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Factors influencing marginal tissue remodeling around implants.
Rompen E; Touati B; Van Dooren E
Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2003; 15(10):754-7, 759, 761. PubMed ID: 14969212
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Histological and histomorphometric evaluation of immediate implant placement on a dog model with a new implant surface treatment.
Calvo-Guirado JL; Ortiz-Ruiz AJ; Negri B; López-Marí L; Rodriguez-Barba C; Schlottig F
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Mar; 21(3):308-15. PubMed ID: 20074244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Hard tissue formation adjacent to implants of various size and configuration immediately placed into extraction sockets: an experimental study in dogs.
Caneva M; Salata LA; de Souza SS; Bressan E; Botticelli D; Lang NP
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Sep; 21(9):885-90. PubMed ID: 20491839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of implant surface properties on peri-implant bone healing: a histological and histomorphometric study in dogs.
Al-Hamdan K; Al-Moaber SH; Junker R; Jansen JA
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2011 Apr; 22(4):399-405. PubMed ID: 21561482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. AICRG, Part II: Crestal bone loss associated with the Ankylos implant: loading to 36 months.
Chou CT; Morris HF; Ochi S; Walker L; DesRosiers D
J Oral Implantol; 2004; 30(3):134-43. PubMed ID: 15255390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of the microgap in the peri-implant hard and soft tissues: a histomorphometric study in dogs.
Todescan FF; Pustiglioni FE; Imbronito AV; Albrektsson T; Gioso M
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(4):467-72. PubMed ID: 12182289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Early bone healing around different implant bulk designs and surgical techniques: A study in dogs.
Coelho PG; Suzuki M; Guimaraes MV; Marin C; Granato R; Gil JN; Miller RJ
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 Sep; 12(3):202-8. PubMed ID: 19438947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Peri-implant bone level around implants with platform-switched abutments.
Fickl S; Zuhr O; Stein JM; Hürzeler MB
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010; 25(3):577-81. PubMed ID: 20556258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Influence of microgap location and configuration on radiographic bone loss in nonsubmerged implants: an experimental study in dogs.
Weng D; Nagata MJ; Leite CM; de Melo LG; Bosco AF
Int J Prosthodont; 2011; 24(5):445-52. PubMed ID: 21909485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bone and soft tissue integration to titanium implants with different surface topography: an experimental study in the dog.
Abrahamsson I; Zitzmann NU; Berglundh T; Wennerberg A; Lindhe J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2001; 16(3):323-32. PubMed ID: 11432652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Experimental peri-implant tissue breakdown around different dental implant surfaces: clinical and radiographic evaluation in dogs.
Martins MC; Abi-Rached RS; Shibli JA; Araujo MW; Marcantonio E
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(6):839-48. PubMed ID: 15623059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Surface treatment at the cervical region and its effect on bone maintenance after immediate implantation: an experimental study in dogs.
Coelho PG; Marin C; Granato R; Bonfante EA; Lima CP; Suzuki M
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Aug; 110(2):182-7. PubMed ID: 20418125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation in a Dog Model of Three Antimicrobial Glassy Coatings: Prevention of Bone Loss around Implants and Microbial Assessments.
López-Píriz R; Solá-Linares E; Rodriguez-Portugal M; Malpica B; Díaz-Güemes I; Enciso S; Esteban-Tejeda L; Cabal B; Granizo JJ; Moya JS; Torrecillas R
PLoS One; 2015; 10(10):e0140374. PubMed ID: 26489088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Osseointegration of one-piece zirconia implants compared with a titanium implant of identical design: a histomorphometric study in the dog.
Koch FP; Weng D; Krämer S; Biesterfeld S; Jahn-Eimermacher A; Wagner W
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Mar; 21(3):350-6. PubMed ID: 20074240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
