These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
564 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21561569)
1. Evidence Review Group approaches to the critical appraisal of manufacturer submissions for the NICE STA process: a mapping study and thematic analysis. Kaltenthaler E; Boland A; Carroll C; Dickson R; Fitzgerald P; Papaioannou D Health Technol Assess; 2011 May; 15(22):1-82, iii-iv. PubMed ID: 21561569 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A thematic analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of manufacturers' submissions to the NICE Single Technology Assessment (STA) process. Carroll C; Kaltenthaler E; FitzGerald P; Boland A; Dickson R Health Policy; 2011 Oct; 102(2-3):136-44. PubMed ID: 21763025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The use of exploratory analyses within the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence single technology appraisal process: an evaluation and qualitative analysis. Kaltenthaler E; Carroll C; Hill-McManus D; Scope A; Holmes M; Rice S; Rose M; Tappenden P; Woolacott N Health Technol Assess; 2016 Apr; 20(26):1-48. PubMed ID: 27049841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany. Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J Eur J Health Econ; 2008 Nov; 9 Suppl 1():5-29. PubMed ID: 18987905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany]. Bekkering GE; Kleijnen J Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Dec; 133 Suppl 7():S225-46. PubMed ID: 19034813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A qualitative study of manufacturers' submissions to the UK NICE single technology appraisal process. Kaltenthaler EC; Dickson R; Boland A; Carroll C; Fitzgerald P; Papaioannou D; Akehurst R BMJ Open; 2012; 2(1):e000562. PubMed ID: 22318664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Type and Impact of Evidence Review Group Exploratory Analyses in the NICE Single Technology Appraisal Process. Carroll C; Kaltenthaler E; Hill-McManus D; Scope A; Holmes M; Rice S; Rose M; Tappenden P; Woolacott N Value Health; 2017 Jun; 20(6):785-791. PubMed ID: 28577696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessing searches in NICE single technology appraisals: practice and checklist. Wong R; Paisley S; Carroll C Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2013 Jul; 29(3):315-22. PubMed ID: 23769157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fludarabine phosphate for the first-line treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia. Walker S; Palmer S; Erhorn S; Brent S; Dyker A; Ferrie L; Horsley W; Macfarlane K; White S; Thomas S Health Technol Assess; 2009 Jun; 13 Suppl 1():35-40. PubMed ID: 19567212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Infliximab for the treatment of adults with psoriasis. Loveman E; Turner D; Hartwell D; Cooper K; Clegg A Health Technol Assess; 2009 Jun; 13 Suppl 1():55-60. PubMed ID: 19567215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The use of paclitaxel in the management of early stage breast cancer. Griffin S; Dunn G; Palmer S; Macfarlane K; Brent S; Dyker A; Erhorn S; Humphries C; White S; Horsley W; Ferrie L; Thomas S Health Technol Assess; 2009 Jun; 13 Suppl 1():15-22. PubMed ID: 19567209 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence Single Technology Appraisal process: lessons from the first 4 years. Kaltenthaler E; Papaioannou D; Boland A; Dickson R Value Health; 2011 Dec; 14(8):1158-65. PubMed ID: 22152188 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review. Chilcott J; Tappenden P; Rawdin A; Johnson M; Kaltenthaler E; Paisley S; Papaioannou D; Shippam A Health Technol Assess; 2010 May; 14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. PubMed ID: 20501062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. How should cost-effectiveness analysis be used in health technology coverage decisions? Evidence from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence approach. Williams I; Bryan S; McIver S J Health Serv Res Policy; 2007 Apr; 12(2):73-9. PubMed ID: 17407655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect? Allen D; Rixson L Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2008 Mar; 6(1):78-110. PubMed ID: 21631815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quality-adjusted life-years lack quality in pediatric care: a critical review of published cost-utility studies in child health. Griebsch I; Coast J; Brown J Pediatrics; 2005 May; 115(5):e600-14. PubMed ID: 15867026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Decision making by NICE: examining the influences of evidence, process and context. Cerri KH; Knapp M; Fernández JL Health Econ Policy Law; 2014 Apr; 9(2):119-41. PubMed ID: 23688554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reducing obesity and related chronic disease risk in children and youth: a synthesis of evidence with 'best practice' recommendations. Flynn MA; McNeil DA; Maloff B; Mutasingwa D; Wu M; Ford C; Tough SC Obes Rev; 2006 Feb; 7 Suppl 1():7-66. PubMed ID: 16371076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Informing a decision framework for when NICE should recommend the use of health technologies only in the context of an appropriately designed programme of evidence development. Claxton K; Palmer S; Longworth L; Bojke L; Griffin S; McKenna C; Soares M; Spackman E; Youn J Health Technol Assess; 2012; 16(46):1-323. PubMed ID: 23177626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pemetrexed for the maintenance treatment of locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. Greenhalgh J; McLeod C; Bagust A; Boland A; Fleeman N; Dundar Y; Oyee J; Dickson R; Davis H; Green J; McKenna E; Pearson M Health Technol Assess; 2010 Oct; 14(Suppl. 2):33-9. PubMed ID: 21047489 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]