These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

66 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21561691)

  • 1. Are birth kits a good idea? A systematic review of the evidence.
    Hundley VA; Avan BI; Braunholtz D; Graham WJ
    Midwifery; 2012 Apr; 28(2):204-15. PubMed ID: 21561691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Lessons regarding the use of birth kits in low resource countries.
    Hundley VA; Avan BI; Braunholtz D; Fitzmaurice AE; Graham WJ
    Midwifery; 2011 Dec; 27(6):e222-30. PubMed ID: 21051126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clean birth kits to improve birth practices: development and testing of a country level decision support tool.
    Hundley VA; Avan BI; Ahmed H; Graham WJ;
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2012 Dec; 12():158. PubMed ID: 23253170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of the effectiveness of a clean delivery kit intervention in preventing cord infection and puerperal sepsis among neonates and their mothers in rural Mwanza Region, Tanzania.
    Mosha F; Winani S; Wood S; Changalucha J; Ngasalla B
    Tanzan Health Res Bull; 2005 Sep; 7(3):185-8. PubMed ID: 16941946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Supply kits for antenatal and childbirth care during antenatal care and delivery: a mixed-methods systematic review, the qualitative approach.
    Colomar M; Cafferata ML; Aleman A; Tomasso G; Betran AP
    Reprod Health; 2017 Mar; 14(1):48. PubMed ID: 28359337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Association between clean delivery kit use, clean delivery practices, and neonatal survival: pooled analysis of data from three sites in South Asia.
    Seward N; Osrin D; Li L; Costello A; Pulkki-Brännström AM; Houweling TA; Morrison J; Nair N; Tripathy P; Azad K; Manandhar D; Prost A
    PLoS Med; 2012 Feb; 9(2):e1001180. PubMed ID: 22389634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effectiveness of birthing kits for clean childbirth: a systematic review.
    Lassi ZS; Fisher Z; Andraweera P; Cummins A; Roberts CT
    Int Health; 2020 Jan; 12(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 31340003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Outcomes of independent midwifery attended births in birth centres and home births: a retrospective cohort study in Japan.
    Kataoka Y; Eto H; Iida M
    Midwifery; 2013 Aug; 29(8):965-72. PubMed ID: 23415360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of a clean delivery kit and factors associated with cord infection and puerperal sepsis in Mwanza, Tanzania.
    Winani S; Wood S; Coffey P; Chirwa T; Mosha F; Changalucha J
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2007; 52(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 17207749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. What can a meta-analysis tell us about traditional birth attendant training and pregnancy outcomes?
    Sibley L; Ann Sipe T
    Midwifery; 2004 Mar; 20(1):51-60. PubMed ID: 15020027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Organizing delivery care: what works for safe motherhood?
    Koblinsky MA; Campbell O; Heichelheim J
    Bull World Health Organ; 1999; 77(5):399-406. PubMed ID: 10361757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Topical application of chlorhexidine to neonatal umbilical cords for prevention of omphalitis and neonatal mortality in a rural district of Pakistan: a community-based, cluster-randomised trial.
    Soofi S; Cousens S; Imdad A; Bhutto N; Ali N; Bhutta ZA
    Lancet; 2012 Mar; 379(9820):1029-36. PubMed ID: 22322126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reducing intrapartum-related deaths and disability: can the health system deliver?
    Lawn JE; Kinney M; Lee AC; Chopra M; Donnay F; Paul VK; Bhutta ZA; Bateman M; Darmstadt GL
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2009 Oct; 107 Suppl 1():S123-40, S140-2. PubMed ID: 19815205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Maternal and newborn outcomes in planned home birth vs planned hospital births: a metaanalysis.
    Wax JR; Lucas FL; Lamont M; Pinette MG; Cartin A; Blackstone J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Sep; 203(3):243.e1-8. PubMed ID: 20598284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of the Newhints home-visits intervention on neonatal mortality rate and care practices in Ghana: a cluster randomised controlled trial.
    Kirkwood BR; Manu A; ten Asbroek AH; Soremekun S; Weobong B; Gyan T; Danso S; Amenga-Etego S; Tawiah-Agyemang C; Owusu-Agyei S; Hill Z
    Lancet; 2013 Jun; 381(9884):2184-92. PubMed ID: 23578528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Acceptability and use of clean home delivery kits in Nepal: a qualitative study.
    Beun MH; Wood SK
    J Health Popul Nutr; 2003 Dec; 21(4):367-73. PubMed ID: 15038592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A review of randomized controlled trials of routine antimalarial drug prophylaxis during pregnancy in endemic malarious areas.
    Garner P; Brabin B
    Bull World Health Organ; 1994; 72(1):89-99. PubMed ID: 8131256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Home birth.
    Goldenring JM
    South Med J; 1983 Sep; 76(9):1207. PubMed ID: 6612412
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.