484 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21561706)
1. Priority screening of toxic chemicals and industry sectors in the U.S. toxics release inventory: a comparison of the life cycle impact-based and risk-based assessment tools developed by U.S. EPA.
Lim SR; Lam CW; Schoenung JM
J Environ Manage; 2011 Sep; 92(9):2235-40. PubMed ID: 21561706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantity-based and toxicity-based evaluation of the U.S. Toxics Release Inventory.
Lim SR; Lam CW; Schoenung JM
J Hazard Mater; 2010 Jun; 178(1-3):49-56. PubMed ID: 20122796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Environmental and risk screening for prioritizing pollution prevention opportunities in the U.S. printed wiring board manufacturing industry.
Lam CW; Lim SR; Schoenung JM
J Hazard Mater; 2011 May; 189(1-2):315-22. PubMed ID: 21398034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Combining U.S.-based prioritization tools to improve screening level accountability for environmental impact: the case of the chemical manufacturing industry.
Zhou X; Schoenung JM
J Hazard Mater; 2009 Dec; 172(1):423-31. PubMed ID: 19647936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computational toxicology as implemented by the U.S. EPA: providing high throughput decision support tools for screening and assessing chemical exposure, hazard and risk.
Kavlock R; Dix D
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2010 Feb; 13(2-4):197-217. PubMed ID: 20574897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Advancing exposure characterization for chemical evaluation and risk assessment.
Cohen Hubal EA; Richard A; Aylward L; Edwards S; Gallagher J; Goldsmith MR; Isukapalli S; Tornero-Velez R; Weber E; Kavlock R
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2010 Feb; 13(2-4):299-313. PubMed ID: 20574904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency strategic plan for evaluating the toxicity of chemicals.
Firestone M; Kavlock R; Zenick H; Kramer M;
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2010 Feb; 13(2-4):139-62. PubMed ID: 20574895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Risk assessment and risk management of noncriteria pollutants.
Lee SD
Toxicol Ind Health; 1990 Oct; 6(5):245-55. PubMed ID: 1670281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Implementing the National Academy's Vision and Strategy for Toxicity Testing: opportunities and challenges under the U.S. Toxic Substances Control Act.
Locke PA; Bruce Myers D
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2010 Feb; 13(2-4):376-84. PubMed ID: 20574909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ranking potential impacts of priority and emerging pollutants in urban wastewater through life cycle impact assessment.
Muñoz I; José Gómez M; Molina-Díaz A; Huijbregts MA; Fernández-Alba AR; García-Calvo E
Chemosphere; 2008 Dec; 74(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 18951608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The exposure data landscape for manufactured chemicals.
Egeghy PP; Judson R; Gangwal S; Mosher S; Smith D; Vail J; Cohen Hubal EA
Sci Total Environ; 2012 Jan; 414():159-66. PubMed ID: 22104386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improving the U.S. EPA Toxic Release Inventory database for environmental health research.
Neumann CM
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 1998; 1(3):259-70. PubMed ID: 9644330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Development of the method and U.S. normalization database for Life Cycle Impact Assessment and sustainability metrics.
Bare J; Gloria T; Norris G
Environ Sci Technol; 2006 Aug; 40(16):5108-15. PubMed ID: 16955915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Life cycle toxicity assessment of pesticides used in integrated and organic production of oranges in the Comunidad Valenciana, Spain.
Juraske R; Sanjuán N
Chemosphere; 2011 Feb; 82(7):956-62. PubMed ID: 21075421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Uncertainties for endocrine disrupters: our view on progress.
Daston GP; Cook JC; Kavlock RJ
Toxicol Sci; 2003 Aug; 74(2):245-52. PubMed ID: 12730617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. U.S. EPA regulatory perspectives on the use of QSAR for new and existing chemical evaluations.
Zeeman M; Auer CM; Clements RG; Nabholz JV; Boethling RS
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 1995; 3(3):179-201. PubMed ID: 8564854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A discussion of the U.S. EPA methodology for determining Water Quality Standards (WQS).
Burmaster DE; von Stackelberg KE
Qual Assur; 1992 Jun; 1(3):192-206. PubMed ID: 1344674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S
J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Building a comprehensive mill-level database for the Industrial Sectors Integrated Solutions (ISIS) model of the U.S. pulp and paper sector.
Modak N; Spence K; Sood S; Rosati JA
PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0120954. PubMed ID: 25806516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Water toxicity assessment and spatial pollution patterns identification in a Mediterranean River Basin District. Tools for water management and risk analysis.
Carafa R; Faggiano L; Real M; Munné A; Ginebreda A; Guasch H; Flo M; Tirapu L; von der Ohe PC
Sci Total Environ; 2011 Sep; 409(20):4269-79. PubMed ID: 21794894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
