258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21561992)
1. The utility of the structured interview of reported symptoms in a sample of individuals with intellectual disabilities.
Weiss RA; Rosenfeld B; Farkas MR
Assessment; 2011 Sep; 18(3):284-90. PubMed ID: 21561992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Use of the SIRS in compensation cases: an examination of its validity and generalizability.
Rogers R; Payne JW; Berry DT; Granacher RP
Law Hum Behav; 2009 Jun; 33(3):213-24. PubMed ID: 18679780
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Validation of an abbreviated version of the structured interview of reported symptoms in outpatient psychiatric and community settings.
Green D; Rosenfeld B; Dole T; Pivovarova E; Zapf PA
Law Hum Behav; 2008 Apr; 32(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 17558482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. New and improved? A comparison of the original and revised versions of the structured interview of reported symptoms.
Green D; Rosenfeld B; Belfi B
Assessment; 2013 Apr; 20(2):210-8. PubMed ID: 23242218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of malingering with repeat forensic evaluations: patient variability and possible misclassification on the SIRS and other feigning measures.
Rogers R; Vitacco MJ; Kurus SJ
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2010; 38(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 20305084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluating the gold standard: a review and meta-analysis of the Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms.
Green D; Rosenfeld B
Psychol Assess; 2011 Mar; 23(1):95-107. PubMed ID: 21381842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Malingering in a correctional setting: the use of the Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms in a jail sample.
McDermott BE; Sokolov G
Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(5):753-65. PubMed ID: 19743514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Study of the SIRS with severely traumatized patients.
Rogers R; Payne JW; Correa AA; Gillard ND; Ross CA
J Pers Assess; 2009 Sep; 91(5):429-38. PubMed ID: 19672749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detection strategies for malingering with the Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test: a confirmatory factor analysis of its underlying dimensions.
Vitacco MJ; Jackson RL; Rogers R; Neumann CS; Miller HA; Gabel J
Assessment; 2008 Mar; 15(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 18258736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The vulnerability to coaching across measures of effort.
Brennan AM; Meyer S; David E; Pella R; Hill BD; Gouvier WD
Clin Neuropsychol; 2009 Feb; 23(2):314-28. PubMed ID: 18609324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Utility of the MMPI-2-RF (Restructured Form) validity scales in detecting malingering in a criminal forensic setting: a known-groups design.
Sellbom M; Toomey JA; Wygant DB; Kucharski LT; Duncan S
Psychol Assess; 2010 Mar; 22(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 20230148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Screening for malingering in a criminal-forensic sample with the personality assessment inventory.
Boccaccini MT; Murrie DC; Duncan SA
Psychol Assess; 2006 Dec; 18(4):415-23. PubMed ID: 17154762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic utility of the structured inventory of malingered symptomatology to detect malingering in a forensic sample.
Wisdom NM; Callahan JL; Shaw TG
Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2010 Mar; 25(2):118-25. PubMed ID: 20110279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment instruments measuring malingering used with individuals who have mental retardation: potential problems and issues.
Hurley KE; Deal WP
Ment Retard; 2006 Apr; 44(2):112-9. PubMed ID: 16689611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Identification of feigned mental retardation using the new generation of malingering detection instruments: preliminary findings.
Graue LO; Berry DT; Clark JA; Sollman MJ; Cardi M; Hopkins J; Werline D
Clin Neuropsychol; 2007 Dec; 21(6):929-42. PubMed ID: 17886151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Screening for feigning in a civil forensic setting.
Alwes YR; Clark JA; Berry DT; Granacher RP
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2008 Feb; 30(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 18938665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Likelihood of obtaining Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms (SIRS) and SIRS-2 elevations among forensic psychiatric inpatients with screening elevations on the Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test.
Glassmire DM; Tarescavage AM; Gottfried ED
Psychol Assess; 2016 Dec; 28(12):1586-1596. PubMed ID: 27046275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Psychometric properties and norms of the German ABC-Community and PAS-ADD Checklist.
Zeilinger EL; Weber G; Haveman MJ
Res Dev Disabil; 2011; 32(6):2431-40. PubMed ID: 21824747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An evaluation of malingering screens with competency to stand trial patients: a known-groups comparison.
Vitacco MJ; Rogers R; Gabel J; Munizza J
Law Hum Behav; 2007 Jun; 31(3):249-60. PubMed ID: 17058121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms-2nd Edition (SIRS-2): Use and Admissibility in Forensic Mental Health Assessment.
Wygant DB; Tylicki JL; Disney LF; Connelly AI
J Pers Assess; 2022; 104(2):265-280. PubMed ID: 34871131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
