These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21562071)

  • 1. Visual perception of skeletal class and biotype in Spain.
    Romero-Maroto M; Nieto-Sánchez I; Míguez-Contreras M; López-de-Andrés A
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Jun; 34(3):322-6. PubMed ID: 21562071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perceptions of facial aesthetics in two and three dimensions.
    Todd SA; Hammond P; Hutton T; Cochrane S; Cunningham S
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Aug; 27(4):363-9. PubMed ID: 15961568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Angles of facial convexity in different skeletal Classes.
    Godt A; Müller A; Kalwitzki M; Göz G
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Dec; 29(6):648-53. PubMed ID: 17878186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The perception of facial aesthetics in a young Spanish population.
    Macías Gago AB; Romero Maroto M; Crego A
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Jun; 34(3):335-9. PubMed ID: 21447783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Panel perception of change in facial aesthetics following orthodontic treatment in adolescents.
    Kiekens RM; Maltha JC; van 't Hof MA; Straatman H; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Apr; 30(2):141-6. PubMed ID: 18263888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Orthodontists' and laypersons' aesthetic assessment of Class III subjects referred for orthognathic surgery.
    Fabré M; Mossaz C; Christou P; Kiliaridis S
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Aug; 31(4):443-8. PubMed ID: 19395371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of providers' and consumers' perceptions of facial-profile attractiveness.
    Maple JR; Vig KW; Beck FM; Larsen PE; Shanker S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):690-6; quiz 801. PubMed ID: 16360907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The integumental profile: a reflection of the underlying skeletal configuration?
    Kuyl MH; Verbeeck RM; Dermaut LR
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Dec; 106(6):597-604. PubMed ID: 7977205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Photographic soft-tissue profile analysis in children at 6 years of age.
    Dimaggio FR; Ciusa V; Sforza C; Ferrario VF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Oct; 132(4):475-80. PubMed ID: 17920500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Assessment of orthodontic treatment need: a comparison of study models and facial photographs.
    Sherlock JM; Cobourne MT; McDonald F
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 2008 Feb; 36(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 18205636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The anthropomorphic proportions of the face: an evaluation of the response to orthodontic surgical treatment of Angle class III].
    Savastano C; Craca R
    Minerva Stomatol; 1992 Sep; 41(9):373-83. PubMed ID: 1491654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Aesthetic evaluation of profile incisor inclination.
    Ghaleb N; Bouserhal J; Bassil-Nassif N
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Jun; 33(3):228-35. PubMed ID: 20716642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reliability of soft tissue profile analysis in children.
    Fields HW; Vann WF; Vig KW
    Angle Orthod; 1982 Apr; 52(2):159-65. PubMed ID: 6213182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of non-extraction orthodontic treatment on the vertical dimension: a comparison of a dolichofacial and a mesofacial group.
    Lin CH; Short LL; Banting DW
    Aust Orthod J; 2012 May; 28(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 22866592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing soft-tissue characteristics of facial asymmetry with photographs.
    Lee MS; Chung DH; Lee JW; Cha KS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jul; 138(1):23-31. PubMed ID: 20620830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Morphometric analysis of facial profile in adults.
    Krey KF; Dannhauer KH
    J Orofac Orthop; 2008 Nov; 69(6):424-36. PubMed ID: 19169639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Observable deviation of the facial and anterior tooth midlines.
    Cardash HS; Ormanier Z; Laufer BZ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Mar; 89(3):282-5. PubMed ID: 12644804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of the perception of facial profile by the general public and 3 groups of clinicians.
    Cochrane SM; Cunningham SJ; Hunt NP
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1999; 14(4):291-5. PubMed ID: 10895644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dentoalveolar heights in skeletal class I normodivergent facial patterns.
    Zafar-Ul-Islam ; Shaikh A; Fida M
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2012 Jan; 22(1):5-9. PubMed ID: 22237181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Orthodontists' perceptions of the need for orthognathic surgery in patients with Class II Division 1 malocclusion based on extraoral examinations.
    Hodge TM; Boyd PT; Munyombwe T; Littlewood SJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Jul; 142(1):52-9. PubMed ID: 22748990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.