These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21562071)

  • 21. Perception of facial profile attractiveness of different antero-posterior and vertical proportions.
    Abu Arqoub SH; Al-Khateeb SN
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Feb; 33(1):103-11. PubMed ID: 20558590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Are ratings of dentofacial attractiveness influenced by dentofacial midline discrepancies?
    Shyagali TR; Chandralekha B; Bhayya DP; Kumar S; Balasubramanyam G
    Aust Orthod J; 2008 Nov; 24(2):91-5. PubMed ID: 19113072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Facial aesthetics and the divine proportion: a comparison of surgical and non-surgical class II treatment.
    Shell TL; Woods MG
    Aust Orthod J; 2004 Nov; 20(2):51-63. PubMed ID: 16429875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of facial attractiveness from end-of-treatment facial photographs.
    Shafiee R; Korn EL; Pearson H; Boyd RL; Baumrind S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):500-8. PubMed ID: 18405813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cephalometric measures as indicators of facial attractiveness.
    Tulloch C; Phillips C; Dann C
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1993; 8(3):171-9. PubMed ID: 8301165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Relationship between orthodontic expertise and perception of treatment needs for maxillary protrusion: comparison of dental students, residents, and orthodontists.
    Kuroda S; Fuji A; Sugie M; Uoi S; Kondo R; Ando R; Yamashiro T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Mar; 137(3):340-5. PubMed ID: 20197170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Evaluation of lower facial esthetics in females with different skeletal patterns].
    Zhang KK; Yang SY; Geng YD; Xiao WW; Peng HZ
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Jun; 55(6):388-393. PubMed ID: 32486568
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. ANB skeletal types correlated to facial morphology: Euclidean distance matrix analysis.
    Ferrario VF; Sforza C; D'Addona A; Miani A; Poggio CE
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1993; 8(3):181-90. PubMed ID: 8301166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of orthodontic treatment need by professionals and parents with different socio-demographic characteristics.
    Doğan AA; Sari E; Uskun E; Sağlam AM
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Dec; 32(6):672-6. PubMed ID: 20299423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Subjective facial analysis and its correlation with dental relationships.
    Siécola GS; Capelozza L; Lorenzoni DC; Janson G; Henriques JFC
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2017; 22(2):87-94. PubMed ID: 28658360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Imprecision in orthodontic diagnosis: reliability of clinical measures of malocclusion.
    Keeling SD; McGorray S; Wheeler TT; King GJ
    Angle Orthod; 1996; 66(5):381-91. PubMed ID: 8893108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Configuration of facial features influences subjective evaluation of facial type.
    Karavaka SM; Halazonetis DJ; Spyropoulos MN
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Feb; 133(2):277-82. PubMed ID: 18249295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Validity and reliability of facial profile evaluation in vertical and horizontal dimensions from lateral cephalograms and lateral photographs.
    Michiels G; Sather AH
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1994; 9(1):43-54. PubMed ID: 8006483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The relationship between facial skeletal class and expert-rated interpersonal skill: an epidemiological survey on young Italian adults.
    Senna A; Abbenante D; Tremolizzo L; Campus G; Strohmenger L
    BMC Psychiatry; 2006 Oct; 6():41. PubMed ID: 17032444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Smile esthetics: perception and comparison of treated and untreated smiles.
    Işiksal E; Hazar S; Akyalçin S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jan; 129(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 16443472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Relationship between vertical skeletal pattern and success rate of orthodontic mini-implants.
    Moon CH; Park HK; Nam JS; Im JS; Baek SH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Jul; 138(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 20620833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Face perception in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate and patients with severe Class III malocclusion compared to controls.
    Meyer-Marcotty P; Kochel J; Boehm H; Linz C; Klammert U; Stellzig-Eisenhauer A
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2011 Apr; 39(3):158-63. PubMed ID: 20580240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Analysis of the soft tissue facial profile by means of angular measurements.
    Anić-Milosević S; Lapter-Varga M; Slaj M
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Apr; 30(2):135-40. PubMed ID: 18263886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Craniofacial morphological characteristics of Chinese adults with normal occlusion and different skeletal divergence.
    Xiao D; Gao H; Ren Y
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Apr; 33(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 20841315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Pattern of malocclusion in orthodontic patients: a hospital based study.
    Gul-e-Erum ; Fida M
    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2008; 20(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 19024184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.