These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21562071)

  • 41. The shape and size of the sella turcica in skeletal Class I, Class II, and Class III Saudi subjects.
    Alkofide EA
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Oct; 29(5):457-63. PubMed ID: 17693429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Role of lateral cephalograms in assessing severity and difficulty of orthodontic cases.
    Pae EK; McKenna GA; Sheehan TJ; Garcia R; Kuhlberg A; Nanda R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Sep; 120(3):254-62. PubMed ID: 11552124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Skull thickness in patients with skeletal Class II and Class III malocclusions.
    Arntsen T; Kjaer I; Sonnesen L
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2008 Nov; 11(4):229-34. PubMed ID: 18950320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Evaluation of changes in the vertical facial dimension with different anchorage systems in extraction and non-extraction subjects treated by Begg fixed appliances: a retrospective study.
    Alkumru P; Erdem D; Altug-Atac AT
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Oct; 29(5):508-16. PubMed ID: 17974541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. An index of orthodontic treatment complexity.
    Llewellyn SK; Hamdan AM; Rock WP
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):186-92. PubMed ID: 17229790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A nonradiographic approach to detect Class III skeletal discrepancies.
    Staudt CB; Kiliaridis S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jul; 136(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 19577148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Uvulo-glosso-pharyngeal dimensions in different anteroposterior skeletal patterns.
    Abu Allhaija ES; Al-Khateeb SN
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Nov; 75(6):1012-8. PubMed ID: 16448247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Perception of facial attractiveness by patients, peers, and professionals.
    Phillips C; Griffin T; Bennett E
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 1995; 10(2):127-35. PubMed ID: 9081998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Prevalence of malocclusion in a sample of Lebanese schoolchildren: an epidemiological study.
    Saleh FK
    East Mediterr Health J; 1999 Mar; 5(2):337-43. PubMed ID: 10793811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Compensation for vertical dysplasia and its clinical application.
    Anwar N; Fida M
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Oct; 31(5):516-22. PubMed ID: 19679646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Prediction of dental and skeletal relationships from facial profiles in preschool children.
    Fields HW; Vann WF
    Pediatr Dent; 1979 Mar; 1(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 162211
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Panel perception of facial attractiveness.
    Kerr WJ; O'Donnell JM
    Br J Orthod; 1990 Nov; 17(4):299-304. PubMed ID: 2285698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Inter-examiner variability in orthodontic treatment decisions for Danish children with 'borderline' treatment need.
    Baelum V; Borchorst E; Buch H; Dømgaard P; Hartig LE
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Apr; 34(2):250-6. PubMed ID: 21252189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Rating of facial attractiveness.
    Phillips C; Tulloch C; Dann C
    Community Dent Oral Epidemiol; 1992 Aug; 20(4):214-20. PubMed ID: 1526107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. 3D dentofacial photogrammetry reference values: a novel approach to orthodontic diagnosis.
    Masoud MI; Bansal N; C Castillo J; Manosudprasit A; Allareddy V; Haghi A; Hawkins HC; Otárola-Castillo E
    Eur J Orthod; 2017 Apr; 39(2):215-225. PubMed ID: 28339510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Comparative evaluation of cephalometric occlusal characteristics between the long face pattern and pattern I.
    de Oliveira EG; Pinzan-Vercelino CR
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2013; 18(3):86-93. PubMed ID: 24094016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. A study of the face recognition ability of orthodontists and lay persons of different age groups.
    Walker R; Stokes M; Socker M; Collins M
    J Orthod; 2012 Mar; 39(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 22433322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Golden proportions as predictors of attractiveness and malocclusion.
    Rajiv A; Juhi Y
    Indian J Dent Res; 2014; 25(6):788-93. PubMed ID: 25728115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Diagnostic value of profile photography in identifying departures from the norm of growth pattern and horizontal jaw relationship.
    Sajjadi SH; Elmi B; Hajizade N; Rakhshan V
    Int Orthod; 2017 Sep; 15(3):322-331. PubMed ID: 28778724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Periodontal biotype: characteristic, prevalence and dimensions related to dental malocclusion.
    Matarese G; Isola G; Ramaglia L; Dalessandri D; Lucchese A; Alibrandi A; Fabiano F; Cordasco G
    Minerva Stomatol; 2016 Aug; 65(4):231-8. PubMed ID: 27035270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.