These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2156285)

  • 1. Ductal carcinoma in situ: atypical mammographic appearances.
    Sullivan DC
    Radiology; 1990 Apr; 175(1):285. PubMed ID: 2156285
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ductal carcinoma in situ: atypical mammographic appearances.
    Ikeda DM; Andersson I
    Radiology; 1989 Sep; 172(3):661-6. PubMed ID: 2549563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The importance of mammography in early detection of breast cancer (author's transl)].
    Menges V; Engeler V; Stadelmann R
    Radiol Clin Biol; 1974; 43(4):334-40. PubMed ID: 4363831
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinically occult ductal carcinoma in situ detected with mammography: analysis of 100 cases with radiologic-pathologic correlation.
    Stomper PC; Connolly JL; Meyer JE; Harris JR
    Radiology; 1989 Jul; 172(1):235-41. PubMed ID: 2544922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Role of the radiologist in minimal cancer of the breast].
    Guttadauro M; Tonegutti M
    Minerva Chir; 1989 Feb; 44(3):401-3. PubMed ID: 2541374
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ductal carcinoma in situ: mammographic findings and clinical implications.
    Dershaw DD; Abramson A; Kinne DW
    Radiology; 1989 Feb; 170(2):411-5. PubMed ID: 2536185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The accuracy of MRI diagnosis for the early detection of breast cancer in mammographic and clinically unclear cases. The diagnostic problem case].
    Allgayer B; Lukas P; Loos W; Mühlbauer K
    Rontgenpraxis; 1991 Dec; 44(12):368-71. PubMed ID: 1664545
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. New insights into mammographic correlations in breast pathology.
    Troupin RH; Orel SG
    Curr Opin Radiol; 1991 Aug; 3(4):593-601. PubMed ID: 1653588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mammographic changes following biopsy and lumpectomy-breast irradiation.
    Wapnir IL; Alden-Corbett S; Zicherman B; Greco RS
    N J Med; 1993 Jan; 90(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 8380491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Roentgenologic and morphologic characteristics of impalpable breast cancer].
    Vlasov PV; Galil-Ogly GA; Rozhkova NI; Ingberman IaKh; Golov LB
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 1984; (6):41-8. PubMed ID: 6099621
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Assessment of non-palpable mammographic changes of the breast].
    Diergarten K; Kessler U; Eiermann W
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 1989; 245(1-4):681-3. PubMed ID: 2552940
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Early detection of DCIS broadens therapy options.
    D'Agincourt L
    Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1992 Sep; 14(9):80-5. PubMed ID: 10150096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The management of in situ breast cancer.
    Gump FE
    Compr Ther; 1992 Jun; 18(6):1-4. PubMed ID: 1324823
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Breast cancer screening.
    Milbrath JR; Moskowitz M; Bauermeister D
    Crit Rev Diagn Imaging; 1981; 16(3):181-218. PubMed ID: 6268356
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Breast carcinoma: successful early diagnosis, increased mortality].
    Paterok EM; Siebzehnrübl E; Schulz-Wendtland R; Koch T
    Rontgenpraxis; 1995 May; 48(5):125-31. PubMed ID: 7792664
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Tubular carcinoma of the breast. Mammographic appearance and pathological correlation.
    Feig SA; Shaber GS; Patchefsky AS; Schwartz GF; Edeiken J; Nerlinger R
    Radiology; 1978 Nov; 129(2):311-4. PubMed ID: 212776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Roentgen symptoms of early cancer of the breast].
    Kopp W; Fotter R; Schneider G
    Radiologe; 1986 Oct; 26(10):498-502. PubMed ID: 3024205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The positive predictive value of mammography.
    Kopans DB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1992 Mar; 158(3):521-6. PubMed ID: 1310825
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Pitfalls in mammography screening policy: breast cancer in a 26-year-old patient.
    Castelo-Branco C; Gratacós E; Fernandez PL; Velasco M; Iglesias X; Fortuny A
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1993 Feb; 48(2):141-4. PubMed ID: 8387938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Focal areas of increased opacity in ductal carcinoma in situ of the comedo type: mammographic-pathologic correlation.
    Kinkel K; Gilles R; Féger C; Guinebretière JM; Tardivon AA; Masselot J; Vanel D
    Radiology; 1994 Aug; 192(2):443-6. PubMed ID: 8029412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.