216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21563327)
1. Cytohistological study of clear cell carcinoma of kidney with special reference to nuclear grading and tumor size.
Mondal SK
Diagn Cytopathol; 2012 Dec; 40(12):1083-7. PubMed ID: 21563327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Original and reviewed nuclear grading according to the Fuhrman system: a multivariate analysis of 388 patients with conventional renal cell carcinoma.
Ficarra V; Martignoni G; Maffei N; Brunelli M; Novara G; Zanolla L; Pea M; Artibani W
Cancer; 2005 Jan; 103(1):68-75. PubMed ID: 15573369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A Pilot Study Evaluating Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology of Clear-Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma: Comparison of Ancillary Immunocytochemistry and Cytomorphological Characteristics of SurePath™ Liquid-Based Preparations with Conventional Smears.
Lee CH; Chung SY; Moon KC; Park IA; Chung YR; Ryu HS
Acta Cytol; 2015; 59(3):239-47. PubMed ID: 26044824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Grading of clear cell renal cell carcinoma should be based on nucleolar prominence.
Delahunt B; Sika-Paotonu D; Bethwaite PB; William Jordan T; Magi-Galluzzi C; Zhou M; Samaratunga H; Srigley JR
Am J Surg Pathol; 2011 Aug; 35(8):1134-9. PubMed ID: 21716085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prognostic significance of high nuclear grade in patients with pathologic T1a renal cell carcinoma.
Suzuki K; Mizuno R; Mikami S; Tanaka N; Kanao K; Kikuchi E; Miyajima A; Nakagawa K; Oya M
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2012 Sep; 42(9):831-5. PubMed ID: 22811408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Can renal biopsy accurately predict histological subtype and Fuhrman grade of renal cell carcinoma?
Millet I; Curros F; Serre I; Taourel P; Thuret R
J Urol; 2012 Nov; 188(5):1690-4. PubMed ID: 22998910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Small renal tumors: correlation of clinical and pathological features with tumor size.
Pahernik S; Ziegler S; Roos F; Melchior SW; Thüroff JW
J Urol; 2007 Aug; 178(2):414-7; discussion 416-7. PubMed ID: 17561161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Fuhrman grading is not appropriate for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma.
Delahunt B; Sika-Paotonu D; Bethwaite PB; McCredie MR; Martignoni G; Eble JN; Jordan TW
Am J Surg Pathol; 2007 Jun; 31(6):957-60. PubMed ID: 17527087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The correlation between size of renal cell carcinoma and its histopathological characteristics: a single center study of 1867 renal cell carcinoma cases.
Zhang C; Li X; Hao H; Yu W; He Z; Zhou L
BJU Int; 2012 Dec; 110(11 Pt B):E481-5. PubMed ID: 22540142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The chromophobe tumor grading system is the preferred grading scheme for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma.
Finley DS; Shuch B; Said JW; Galliano G; Jeffries RA; Afifi AA; Castor B; Magyar C; Sadaat A; Kabbinavar FF; Belldegrun AS; Pantuck AJ
J Urol; 2011 Dec; 186(6):2168-74. PubMed ID: 22014797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of pNx/pN0 grouping in a multivariate setting for outcome modeling in patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma.
Ward JF; Blute ML; Cheville JC; Lohse CM; Weaver AL; Zincke H
J Urol; 2002 Jul; 168(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 12050492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Histological subtyping and nuclear grading of renal cell carcinoma and their implications for survival: a retrospective nation-wide study of 629 patients.
Gudbjartsson T; Hardarson S; Petursdottir V; Thoroddsen A; Magnusson J; Einarsson GV
Eur Urol; 2005 Oct; 48(4):593-600. PubMed ID: 15964127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prognostic significance of perinephric fat infiltration and tumor size in renal cell carcinoma.
Yoo C; Song C; Hong JH; Kim CS; Ahn H
J Urol; 2008 Aug; 180(2):486-91; discussion 491. PubMed ID: 18550101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Percentage of high-grade carcinoma as a prognostic indicator in patients with renal cell carcinoma.
Serrano MF; Katz M; Yan Y; Kibel AS; Humphrey PA
Cancer; 2008 Aug; 113(3):477-83. PubMed ID: 18484589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fine-needle aspiration of renal cell carcinoma: is accurate Fuhrman grading possible on cytologic material?
Bishop JA; Hosler GA; Kulesza P; Erozan YS; Ali SZ
Diagn Cytopathol; 2011 Mar; 39(3):168-71. PubMed ID: 21319316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prognostic significance of primary-tumor extension, stage and grade of nuclear differentiation in patients with renal cell carcinoma.
Fiori E; De Cesare A; Galati G; Bononi M; D'Andrea N; Barbarosos A; Izzo L; Bolognese A
J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2002 Jun; 21(2):229-32. PubMed ID: 12148583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Significance of nuclear grade and tumor size in Korean patients with chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: a comparison with conventional renal cell carcinoma.
Ku JH; Moon KC; Kwak C; Kim HH
Urol Oncol; 2011; 29(5):487-91. PubMed ID: 19767221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Percutaneous biopsy of renal cell carcinoma underestimates nuclear grade.
Blumenfeld AJ; Guru K; Fuchs GJ; Kim HL
Urology; 2010 Sep; 76(3):610-3. PubMed ID: 20163843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Analysis of clinicopathological features and prognosis in 68 patients with chromophobe renal cell carcinoma].
Huang JW; Zhang J; Dong BJ; Kong W; Niu SX; Chen YH; Xue W; Liu DM; Huang YR
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2012 Jul; 34(7):510-3. PubMed ID: 22967469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A novel tumor grading scheme for chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: prognostic utility and comparison with Fuhrman nuclear grade.
Paner GP; Amin MB; Alvarado-Cabrero I; Young AN; Stricker HJ; Moch H; Lyles RH
Am J Surg Pathol; 2010 Sep; 34(9):1233-40. PubMed ID: 20679882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
