These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21564196)
1. Respecting the expertise of clinician assessors: construct alignment is one good answer. Ginsburg S Med Educ; 2011 Jun; 45(6):546-8. PubMed ID: 21564196 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Good questions, good answers: construct alignment improves the performance of workplace-based assessment scales. Crossley J; Johnson G; Booth J; Wade W Med Educ; 2011 Jun; 45(6):560-9. PubMed ID: 21501218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Attention to gender in communication skills assessment instruments in medical education: a review. Dielissen P; Bottema B; Verdonk P; Lagro-Janssen T Med Educ; 2011 Mar; 45(3):239-48. PubMed ID: 21299599 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Purposeful assessment. Amin Z Med Educ; 2012 Jan; 46(1):4-7. PubMed ID: 22150188 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Capturing the essence of developing endovascular expertise for the construction of a global assessment instrument. Bech B; Lönn L; Schroeder TV; Räder SB; Ringsted C Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2010 Sep; 40(3):292-302. PubMed ID: 20807686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [The use of a portfolio in the medical curriculum]. Rudnicki PM Ugeskr Laeger; 2004 May; 166(21):2009-11. PubMed ID: 15222075 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Discrepancy-agreement grading provides feedback on rater judgements. Yusoff MS Med Educ; 2012 Nov; 46(11):1122. PubMed ID: 23078712 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Team OSCEs: evaluation methodology or educational encounter? Marshall D; Hall P; Taniguchi A Med Educ; 2008 Nov; 42(11):1129-30. PubMed ID: 18991985 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. A Critique of the USMLE clinical skills examination. Mehta NP; Kramer DB MedGenMed; 2005 May; 7(2):76. PubMed ID: 16369454 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The impact of pass/fail grading. Short JG; Bloodgood RA Acad Med; 2009 Nov; 84(11):1470; author reply 1470-1. PubMed ID: 19858790 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment in medical education. Murphy JF Ir Med J; 2007 Feb; 100(2):356. PubMed ID: 17432806 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The impact on the educators of 'complex fails' in the MRCGP: ensuring systems learning through significant event auditing. Sneddon A; MacVicar R Educ Prim Care; 2012 Jan; 23(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 22306150 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Unsigned: why anonymous evaluations in clinical settings are counterproductive. Guerrasio J; Weissberg M Med Educ; 2012 Oct; 46(10):928-30. PubMed ID: 22989124 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Script concordance testing: a review of published validity evidence. Lubarsky S; Charlin B; Cook DA; Chalk C; van der Vleuten CP Med Educ; 2011 Apr; 45(4):329-38. PubMed ID: 21401680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Training OSCE examiners: minimal effort with far-reaching results. Schüttpelz-Brauns K; Nühse K; Strohmer R; Kaden JJ Med Educ; 2019 Nov; 53(11):1153-1154. PubMed ID: 31583759 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [How to grade a good physician?]. Treutiger CJ Lakartidningen; 1993 Apr; 90(15):1443. PubMed ID: 8479268 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Experiential learning: another turn on 'see one, do one'. Ringsted C Med Educ; 2009 Jul; 43(7):606-7. PubMed ID: 19573179 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment in medical education. de Galan BE; van Gurp PJ; Stuyt PM N Engl J Med; 2007 May; 356(20):2108-9; author reply 2110. PubMed ID: 17514782 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment in medical education. Epstein RM N Engl J Med; 2007 Jan; 356(4):387-96. PubMed ID: 17251535 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]