These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

275 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21564268)

  • 1. Source reliability and the conjunction fallacy.
    Jarvstad A; Hahn U
    Cogn Sci; 2011; 35(4):682-711. PubMed ID: 21564268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the determinants of the conjunction fallacy: probability versus inductive confirmation.
    Tentori K; Crupi V; Russo S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2013 Feb; 142(1):235-255. PubMed ID: 22823498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The conjunction fallacy, confirmation, and quantum theory: comment on Tentori, Crupi, and Russo (2013).
    Busemeyer JR; Wang Z; Pothos EM; Trueblood JS
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2015 Feb; 144(1):236-43. PubMed ID: 25621376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Probability theory, not the very guide of life.
    Juslin P; Nilsson H; Winman A
    Psychol Rev; 2009 Oct; 116(4):856-74. PubMed ID: 19839686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Surprising rationality in probability judgment: Assessing two competing models.
    Costello F; Watts P; Fisher C
    Cognition; 2018 Jan; 170():280-297. PubMed ID: 29096329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Frequency, probability, and prediction: easy solutions to cognitive illusions?
    Griffin D; Buehler R
    Cogn Psychol; 1999 Feb; 38(1):48-78. PubMed ID: 10090798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Two meanings of "if"? Individual differences in the interpretation of conditionals.
    Oberauer K; Geiger SM; Fischer K; Weidenfeld A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Jun; 60(6):790-819. PubMed ID: 17514595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The conjunction fallacy and the many meanings of and.
    Hertwig R; Benz B; Krauss S
    Cognition; 2008 Sep; 108(3):740-53. PubMed ID: 18723167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pseudodiagnosticity revisited.
    Crupi V; Tentori K; Lombardi L
    Psychol Rev; 2009 Oct; 116(4):971-85. PubMed ID: 19839693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The conjunction effect: new evidence for robustness.
    Stolarz-Fantino S; Fantino E; Zizzo DJ; Wen J
    Am J Psychol; 2003; 116(1):15-34. PubMed ID: 12710220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Causal conjunction fallacies: the roles of causal strength and mental resources.
    Crisp AK; Feeney A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Dec; 62(12):2320-37. PubMed ID: 19391046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. How to explain receptivity to conjunction-fallacy inhibition training: evidence from the Iowa gambling task.
    Cassotti M; Moutier S
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Apr; 72(3):378-84. PubMed ID: 20015585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Testing boundary conditions for the conjunction fallacy: effects of response mode, conceptual focus, and problem type.
    Wedell DH; Moro R
    Cognition; 2008 Apr; 107(1):105-36. PubMed ID: 17927971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Noisy probability judgment, the conjunction fallacy, and rationality: Comment on Costello and Watts (2014).
    Crupi V; Tentori K
    Psychol Rev; 2016 Jan; 123(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 26709413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Random variation and systematic biases in probability estimation.
    Howe R; Costello F
    Cogn Psychol; 2020 Dec; 123():101306. PubMed ID: 33189032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The rationality of informal argumentation: a Bayesian approach to reasoning fallacies.
    Hahn U; Oaksford M
    Psychol Rev; 2007 Jul; 114(3):704-32. PubMed ID: 17638503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Reasoning about complex probabilistic concepts in childhood.
    Fisk JE; Bury AS; Holden R
    Scand J Psychol; 2006 Dec; 47(6):497-504. PubMed ID: 17107498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Individual differences in causal learning and decision making.
    Osman M; Shanks DR
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Sep; 120(1):93-112. PubMed ID: 15982627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Rationality in medicine.
    Miettinen OS
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2009 Dec; 15(6):960-3. PubMed ID: 20367692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Double Conjunction Fallacies in Physicians' Probability Judgment.
    Crupi V; Elia F; Aprà F; Tentori K
    Med Decis Making; 2018 Aug; 38(6):756-760. PubMed ID: 29978726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.