523 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21564304)
1. The experimental research on two-generation BLB dental implants - part I: surface modification and osseointegration.
Yin K; Wang Z; Fan X; Bian Y; Guo J; Lan J
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Jul; 23(7):846-52. PubMed ID: 21564304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The role of titanium implant surface modification with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles in progressive early bone-implant fixation in vivo.
Lin A; Wang CJ; Kelly J; Gubbi P; Nishimura I
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):808-16. PubMed ID: 19865620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Osseointegration of commercial microstructured titanium implants incorporating magnesium: a histomorphometric study in rabbit cancellous bone.
Park JW; An CH; Jeong SH; Suh JY
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Mar; 23(3):294-300. PubMed ID: 21435010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. In vivo monitoring of the bone healing process around different titanium alloy implant surfaces placed into fresh extraction sockets.
Colombo JS; Satoshi S; Okazaki J; Crean SJ; Sloan AJ; Waddington RJ
J Dent; 2012 Apr; 40(4):338-46. PubMed ID: 22307025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Enhanced osteoconductivity of micro-structured titanium implants (XiVE S CELLplus) by addition of surface calcium chemistry: a histomorphometric study in the rabbit femur.
Park JW; Kim HK; Kim YJ; An CH; Hanawa T
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jul; 20(7):684-90. PubMed ID: 19489932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of chemical and nanotopographical modifications on the early stages of osseointegration.
Meirelles L; Currie F; Jacobsson M; Albrektsson T; Wennerberg A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(4):641-7. PubMed ID: 18807559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative histomorphometry and resonance frequency analysis of implants with moderately rough surfaces in a loaded animal model.
Al-Nawas B; Groetz KA; Goetz H; Duschner H; Wagner W
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 17944964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Histomorphometric and fluorescence microscopic evaluation of interfacial bone healing around 3 different dental implants before and after radiation therapy.
Weinlaender M; Beumer J; Kenney EB; Lekovic V; Holmes R; Moy PK; Plenk H
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(2):212-24. PubMed ID: 16634491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Osseointegration of two different phosphate ion-containing titanium oxide surfaces in rabbit cancellous bone.
Park JW
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Aug; 24 Suppl A100():145-51. PubMed ID: 22251085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomimetic calcium phosphate composite coating of dental implants.
Schliephake H; Scharnweber D; Roesseler S; Dard M; Sewing A; Aref A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(5):738-46. PubMed ID: 17066635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Promotion of osseointegration of anodized titanium implants with a 1α,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 submicron particle coating.
Cho YJ; Heo SJ; Koak JY; Kim SK; Lee SJ; Lee JH
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(6):1225-32. PubMed ID: 22167427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of implant geometry and surface characteristics on progressive osseointegration.
Geurs NC; Jeffcoat RL; McGlumphy EA; Reddy MS; Jeffcoat MK
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(6):811-5. PubMed ID: 12507240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Histomorphometric evaluation of a nanothickness bioceramic deposition on endosseous implants: a study in dogs.
Coelho PG; Cardaropoli G; Suzuki M; Lemons JE
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Dec; 11(4):292-302. PubMed ID: 18783412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of dehiscences to the bone response of implants with an Acid-etched surface: an experimental study in miniature pigs.
Ruehe B; Heberer S; Bayreuther K; Nelson K
J Oral Implantol; 2011; 37(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 20557147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Histomorphometric evaluation of alumina-blasted/acid-etched and thin ion beam-deposited bioceramic surfaces: an experimental study in dogs.
Suzuki M; Guimaraes MV; Marin C; Granato R; Gil JN; Coelho PG
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Mar; 67(3):602-7. PubMed ID: 19231787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of a novel calcium titanate coating on the osseointegration of blasted endosseous implants in rabbit tibiae.
Suh JY; Jeung OC; Choi BJ; Park JW
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Jun; 18(3):362-9. PubMed ID: 17298490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Histologic and histomorphometric comparison of immediately placed hydroxyapatite-coated and titanium plasma-sprayed implants: a pilot study in dogs.
Karabuda C; Sandalli P; Yalcin S; Steflik DE; Parr GR
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1999; 14(4):510-5. PubMed ID: 10453665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Oxidized titanium screws coated with calcium ions and their performance in rabbit bone.
Sul YT; Johansson CB; Albrektsson T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(5):625-34. PubMed ID: 12381062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bone healing at implants with a fluoride-modified surface: an experimental study in dogs.
Berglundh T; Abrahamsson I; Albouy JP; Lindhe J
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Apr; 18(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 17269959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of biomimetically and electrochemically deposited nano-hydroxyapatite coatings on osseointegration of porous titanium implants.
Yang GL; He FM; Hu JA; Wang XX; Zhao SF
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jun; 107(6):782-9. PubMed ID: 19201624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
