91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21565070)
1. Multiplex pre-amplification for noninvasive genetic sampling: is the extra effort worth it?
DE Barba M; Waits LP
Mol Ecol Resour; 2010 Jul; 10(4):659-65. PubMed ID: 21565070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Highly efficient multiplex PCR of noninvasive DNA does not require pre-amplification.
Skrbinšek T; Jelenčič M; Waits L; Kos I; Trontelj P
Mol Ecol Resour; 2010 May; 10(3):495-501. PubMed ID: 21565048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impacts of sampling location within a faeces on DNA quality in two carnivore species.
Stenglein JL; DE Barba M; Ausband DE; Waits LP
Mol Ecol Resour; 2010 Jan; 10(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 21564995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. TECHNICAL ADVANCES: Effects of genotyping protocols on success and errors in identifying individual river otters (Lontra canadensis) from their faeces.
Hansen H; Ben-David M; McDonald DB
Mol Ecol Resour; 2008 Mar; 8(2):282-9. PubMed ID: 21585770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Multiplex preamplification PCR and microsatellite validation enables accurate single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping of historical fish scales.
Smith MJ; Pascal CE; Grauvogel Z; Habicht C; Seeb JE; Seeb LW
Mol Ecol Resour; 2011 Mar; 11 Suppl 1():268-77. PubMed ID: 21429180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Two-step multiplex polymerase chain reaction improves the speed and accuracy of genotyping using DNA from noninvasive and museum samples.
Arandjelovic M; Guschanski K; Schubert G; Harris TR; Thalmann O; Siedel H; Vigilant L
Mol Ecol Resour; 2009 Jan; 9(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 21564562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Noninvasive genetic tracking of the endangered Pyrenean brown bear population.
Taberlet P; Camarra JJ; Griffin S; Uhrès E; Hanotte O; Waits LP; Dubois-Paganon C; Burke T; Bouvet J
Mol Ecol; 1997 Sep; 6(9):869-76. PubMed ID: 9301075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Leader of the pack: faecal pellet deposition order impacts PCR amplification in wombats.
Walker FM; Horsup A; Taylor AC
Mol Ecol Resour; 2009 May; 9(3):720-4. PubMed ID: 21564730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluating mixed samples as a source of error in non-invasive genetic studies using microsatellites.
Roon DA; Thomas ME; Kendall KC; Waits LP
Mol Ecol; 2005 Jan; 14(1):195-201. PubMed ID: 15643963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A forensic DNA profiling system for Northern European brown bears (Ursus arctos).
Andreassen R; Schregel J; Kopatz A; Tobiassen C; Knappskog PM; Hagen SB; Kleven O; Schneider M; Kojola I; Aspi J; Rykov A; Tirronen KF; Danilov PI; Eiken HG
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Dec; 6(6):798-809. PubMed ID: 22483764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effects of storage type and time on DNA amplification success in tropical ungulate faeces.
Soto-Calderón ID; Ntie S; Mickala P; Maisels F; Wickings EJ; Anthony NM
Mol Ecol Resour; 2009 Mar; 9(2):471-9. PubMed ID: 21564676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing reliability of microsatellite genotypes from kit fox faecal samples using genetic and GIS analyses.
Smith DA; Ralls K; Hurt A; Adams B; Parker M; Maldonado JE
Mol Ecol; 2006 Feb; 15(2):387-406. PubMed ID: 16448408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Balancing sample accumulation and DNA degradation rates to optimize noninvasive genetic sampling of sympatric carnivores.
Lonsinger RC; Gese EM; Dempsey SJ; Kluever BM; Johnson TR; Waits LP
Mol Ecol Resour; 2015 Jul; 15(4):831-42. PubMed ID: 25454561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Description of microsatellite markers and genotyping performances using feathers and buccal swabs for the Ivory gull (Pagophila eburnea).
Yannic G; Sermier R; Aebischer A; Gavrilo MV; Gilg O; Miljeteig C; Sabard B; Strøm H; Pouivé E; Broquet T
Mol Ecol Resour; 2011 Sep; 11(5):877-89. PubMed ID: 21518427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Optimal sample storage and extraction procotols for reliable multilocus genotyping of the human parasite Schistosoma mansoni.
Van den Broeck F; Geldof S; Polman K; Volckaert FA; Huyse T
Infect Genet Evol; 2011 Aug; 11(6):1413-8. PubMed ID: 21605705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A method for estimating population sex ratio for sage-grouse using noninvasive genetic samples.
Baumgardt JA; Goldberg CS; Reese KP; Connelly JW; Musil DD; Garton EO; Waits LP
Mol Ecol Resour; 2013 May; 13(3):393-402. PubMed ID: 23347565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A protocol for direct and rapid multiplex PCR amplification on forensically relevant samples.
Verheij S; Harteveld J; Sijen T
Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 Mar; 6(2):167-75. PubMed ID: 21530436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Successful carnivore identification with faecal DNA across a fragmented Amazonian landscape.
Michalski F; Valdez FP; Norris D; Zieminski C; Kashivakura CK; Trinca CS; Smith HB; Vynne C; Wasser SK; Metzger JP; Eizirik E
Mol Ecol Resour; 2011 Sep; 11(5):862-71. PubMed ID: 21676206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The influence of diet on faecal DNA amplification and sex identification in brown bears (Ursus arctos).
Murphy MA; Waits LP; Kendall KC
Mol Ecol; 2003 Aug; 12(8):2261-5. PubMed ID: 12859644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Microsatellite genotyping errors: detection approaches, common sources and consequences for paternal exclusion.
Hoffman JI; Amos W
Mol Ecol; 2005 Feb; 14(2):599-612. PubMed ID: 15660949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
