These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21565662)

  • 21. Influence of premium versus value brand names on the smoking experience in a plain packaging environment: an experimental study.
    Skaczkowski G; Durkin S; Kashima Y; Wakefield M
    BMJ Open; 2017 Jan; 7(1):e014099. PubMed ID: 28093441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The perceptions of UK youth of branded and standardized, 'plain' cigarette packaging.
    Hammond D; White C; Anderson W; Arnott D; Dockrell M
    Eur J Public Health; 2014 Aug; 24(4):537-43. PubMed ID: 24108274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Survey of descriptors on cigarette packs: still misleading consumers?
    Peace J; Wilson N; Hoek J; Edwards R; Thomson G
    N Z Med J; 2009 Sep; 122(1303):90-6. PubMed ID: 19851423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The cigarette pack as image: new evidence from tobacco industry documents.
    Wakefield M; Morley C; Horan JK; Cummings KM
    Tob Control; 2002 Mar; 11 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):I73-80. PubMed ID: 11893817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Young adult smokers' perceptions of plain packaging: a pilot naturalistic study.
    Moodie C; Mackintosh AM; Hastings G; Ford A
    Tob Control; 2011 Sep; 20(5):367-73. PubMed ID: 21752795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The potential impact of plain packaging of cigarette products among Brazilian young women: an experimental study.
    White CM; Hammond D; Thrasher JF; Fong GT
    BMC Public Health; 2012 Sep; 12():737. PubMed ID: 22943135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effect of cigarillo packaging elements on young adult perceptions of product flavor, taste, smell, and appeal.
    Meernik C; Ranney LM; Lazard AJ; Kim K; Queen TL; Avishai A; Boynton MH; Sheeran PJ; Goldstein AO
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0196236. PubMed ID: 29672604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Can Removing Tar Information From Cigarette Packages Reduce Smokers' Misconceptions About Low-Tar Cigarettes? An Experiment From One of the World's Lowest Tar Yield Markets, South Korea.
    Paek HJ; Dewhirst T; Hove T
    Nicotine Tob Res; 2020 May; 22(6):990-996. PubMed ID: 30726984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The impact of cigarette package design on perceptions of risk.
    Hammond D; Parkinson C
    J Public Health (Oxf); 2009 Sep; 31(3):345-53. PubMed ID: 19636066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. What do Marlboro Lights smokers know about low-tar cigarettes?
    Cummings KM; Hyland A; Bansal MA; Giovino GA
    Nicotine Tob Res; 2004 Dec; 6 Suppl 3():S323-32. PubMed ID: 15799595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effects of plain package branding and graphic health warnings on adolescent smokers in the USA, Spain and France.
    Andrews JC; Netemeyer RG; Burton S; Kees J
    Tob Control; 2016 Dec; 25(e2):e120-e126. PubMed ID: 27091642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Young people's perceptions of cigarette packaging and plain packaging: an online survey.
    Moodie C; Ford A; Mackintosh AM; Hastings G
    Nicotine Tob Res; 2012 Jan; 14(1):98-105. PubMed ID: 22025540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Cigarette design and marketing features are associated with increased smoking susceptibility and perception of reduced harm among smokers in 27 EU countries.
    Agaku IT; Omaduvie UT; Filippidis FT; Vardavas CI
    Tob Control; 2015 Dec; 24(e4):e233-40. PubMed ID: 25335899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. "Their Packaging Has Always Been Like a Power": A Qualitative Study of U.S. Smokers' Perceptions of Cigarette Pack Visual Design Features to Inform Product Regulation.
    Lee JGL; Averett PE; Blanchflower T; Landi N; Gregory KR
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2017 Oct; 14(10):. PubMed ID: 29039769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Consumer perceptions of cigarette pack design in France: a comparison of regular, limited edition and plain packaging.
    Gallopel-Morvan K; Moodie C; Hammond D; Eker F; Beguinot E; Martinet Y
    Tob Control; 2012 Sep; 21(5):502-6. PubMed ID: 21998127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Influence of premium vs masked cigarette brand names on the experienced taste of a cigarette after tobacco plain packaging in Australia: an experimental study.
    Skaczkowski G; Durkin S; Kashima Y; Wakefield M
    BMC Public Health; 2018 Mar; 18(1):295. PubMed ID: 29526164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Deadly in pink: the impact of cigarette packaging among young women.
    Doxey J; Hammond D
    Tob Control; 2011 Sep; 20(5):353-60. PubMed ID: 21478476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Larger and More Prominent Graphic Health Warnings on Plain-Packaged Tobacco Products and Avoidant Responses in Current Smokers: a Qualitative Study.
    Hardcastle SJ; Chan DC; Caudwell KM; Sultan S; Cranwell J; Chatzisarantis NL; Hagger MS
    Int J Behav Med; 2016 Feb; 23(1):94-101. PubMed ID: 25920708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Graphic Health Warnings on Cigarette Packs: How Long Before the Effects on Adolescents Wear Out?
    White V; Bariola E; Faulkner A; Coomber K; Wakefield M
    Nicotine Tob Res; 2015 Jul; 17(7):776-83. PubMed ID: 25239958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Impact of female-oriented cigarette packaging in the United States.
    Hammond D; Doxey J; Daniel S; Bansal-Travers M
    Nicotine Tob Res; 2011 Jul; 13(7):579-88. PubMed ID: 21486994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.