BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

783 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21565744)

  • 1. Cost-effectiveness of coronary computed tomography and cardiac stress imaging in the emergency department: a decision analytic model comparing diagnostic strategies for chest pain in patients at low risk of acute coronary syndromes.
    Priest VL; Scuffham PA; Hachamovitch R; Marwick TH
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2011 May; 4(5):549-56. PubMed ID: 21565744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Long-term Cost-Effectiveness of Diagnostic Tests for Assessing Stable Chest Pain: Modeled Analysis of Anatomical and Functional Strategies.
    Bertoldi EG; Stella SF; Rohde LE; Polanczyk CA
    Clin Cardiol; 2016 May; 39(5):249-56. PubMed ID: 27080921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Combined stress myocardial CT perfusion and coronary CT angiography as a feasible strategy among patients presenting with acute chest pain to the emergency department.
    Grandhi GR; Batlle JC; Maroules CD; Janowitz W; Peña CS; Ziffer JA; Macedo R; Nasir K; Cury RC
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2021; 15(2):129-136. PubMed ID: 32807703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A simulation model of clinical and economic outcomes of cardiac CT triage of patients with acute chest pain in the emergency department.
    Goehler A; Ollendorf DA; Jaeger M; Ladapo J; Neumann T; Gazelle GS; Pearson SD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Apr; 196(4):853-61. PubMed ID: 21427336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost-effectiveness of coronary CT angiography versus myocardial perfusion SPECT for evaluation of patients with chest pain and no known coronary artery disease.
    Min JK; Gilmore A; Budoff MJ; Berman DS; O'Day K
    Radiology; 2010 Mar; 254(3):801-8. PubMed ID: 20177094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sixty-four-slice computed tomography of the coronary arteries: cost-effectiveness analysis of patients presenting to the emergency department with low-risk chest pain.
    Khare RK; Courtney DM; Powell ES; Venkatesh AK; Lee TA
    Acad Emerg Med; 2008 Jul; 15(7):623-32. PubMed ID: 19086322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Potential cost effectiveness of initial myocardial perfusion imaging for assessment of emergency department patients with chest pain.
    Radensky PW; Hilton TC; Fulmer H; McLaughlin BA; Stowers SA
    Am J Cardiol; 1997 Mar; 79(5):595-9. PubMed ID: 9068515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost-effectiveness of coronary CT angiography in patients with chest pain: Comparison with myocardial single photon emission tomography.
    Lee SP; Jang EJ; Kim YJ; Cha MJ; Park SY; Song HJ; Choi JE; Shim JI; Ahn J; Lee HJ
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2015; 9(5):428-37. PubMed ID: 25977116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost-effectiveness of a novel blood-pool contrast agent in the setting of chest pain evaluation in an emergency department.
    Espinosa G; Annapragada A
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Oct; 201(4):710-9. PubMed ID: 24059359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost-effectiveness of a novel indication of computed tomography of the coronary arteries.
    Powell ES; Patterson BW; Venkatesh AK; Khare RK
    Crit Pathw Cardiol; 2012 Mar; 11(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 22337217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rationale and design of a randomized trial comparing initial stress echocardiography versus coronary CT angiography in low-to-intermediate risk emergency department patients with chest pain.
    Levsky JM; Haramati LB; Taub CC; Spevack DM; Menegus MA; Travin MI; Vega S; Lerer R; Brown-Manhertz D; Hirschhorn E; Tobin JN; Garcia MJ
    Echocardiography; 2014 Jul; 31(6):744-50. PubMed ID: 24372760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multicenter, randomized trial of quantitative pretest probability to reduce unnecessary medical radiation exposure in emergency department patients with chest pain and dyspnea.
    Kline JA; Jones AE; Shapiro NI; Hernandez J; Hogg MM; Troyer J; Nelson RD
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Jan; 7(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 24275953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diagnostic performance and cost of CT angiography versus stress ECG--a randomized prospective study of suspected acute coronary syndrome chest pain in the emergency department (CT-COMPARE).
    Hamilton-Craig C; Fifoot A; Hansen M; Pincus M; Chan J; Walters DL; Branch KR
    Int J Cardiol; 2014 Dec; 177(3):867-73. PubMed ID: 25466568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The optimal imaging strategy for patients with stable chest pain: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Genders TS; Petersen SE; Pugliese F; Dastidar AG; Fleischmann KE; Nieman K; Hunink MG
    Ann Intern Med; 2015 Apr; 162(7):474-84. PubMed ID: 25844996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Long-term health outcomes and cost-effectiveness of coronary CT angiography in patients with suspicion for acute coronary syndrome.
    Goehler A; Mayrhofer T; Pursnani A; Ferencik M; Lumish HS; Barth C; Karády J; Chow B; Truong QA; Udelson JE; Fleg JL; Nagurney JT; Gazelle GS; Hoffmann U
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2020; 14(1):44-54. PubMed ID: 31303580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimizing Evaluation of Patients with Low-to-Intermediate-Risk Acute Chest Pain: A Randomized Study Comparing Stress Myocardial Perfusion Tomography Incorporating Stress-Only Imaging Versus Cardiac CT.
    Nabi F; Kassi M; Muhyieddeen K; Chang SM; Xu J; Peterson LE; Wray NP; Shirkey BA; Ashton CM; Mahmarian JJ
    J Nucl Med; 2016 Mar; 57(3):378-84. PubMed ID: 26635341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Systematic review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, and economic evaluation, of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy for the diagnosis and management of angina and myocardial infarction.
    Mowatt G; Vale L; Brazzelli M; Hernandez R; Murray A; Scott N; Fraser C; McKenzie L; Gemmell H; Hillis G; Metcalfe M
    Health Technol Assess; 2004 Jul; 8(30):iii-iv, 1-207. PubMed ID: 15248938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A time and imaging cost analysis of low-risk ED observation patients: a conservative 64-section computed tomography coronary angiography "triple rule-out" compared to nuclear stress test strategy.
    Takakuwa KM; Halpern EJ; Shofer FS
    Am J Emerg Med; 2011 Feb; 29(2):187-95. PubMed ID: 20825785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Coronary computed tomography angiography vs. myocardial single photon emission computed tomography in patients with intermediate risk chest pain: a randomized clinical trial for cost-effectiveness comparison based on real-world cost.
    Lee SP; Seo JK; Hwang IC; Park JB; Park EA; Lee W; Paeng JC; Lee HJ; Yoon YE; Kim HL; Koh E; Choi I; Choi JE; Kim YJ
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Apr; 20(4):417-425. PubMed ID: 30052964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The CT-STAT (Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography for Systematic Triage of Acute Chest Pain Patients to Treatment) trial.
    Goldstein JA; Chinnaiyan KM; Abidov A; Achenbach S; Berman DS; Hayes SW; Hoffmann U; Lesser JR; Mikati IA; O'Neil BJ; Shaw LJ; Shen MY; Valeti US; Raff GL;
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2011 Sep; 58(14):1414-22. PubMed ID: 21939822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 40.