These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

783 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21565744)

  • 1. Cost-effectiveness of coronary computed tomography and cardiac stress imaging in the emergency department: a decision analytic model comparing diagnostic strategies for chest pain in patients at low risk of acute coronary syndromes.
    Priest VL; Scuffham PA; Hachamovitch R; Marwick TH
    JACC Cardiovasc Imaging; 2011 May; 4(5):549-56. PubMed ID: 21565744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Long-term Cost-Effectiveness of Diagnostic Tests for Assessing Stable Chest Pain: Modeled Analysis of Anatomical and Functional Strategies.
    Bertoldi EG; Stella SF; Rohde LE; Polanczyk CA
    Clin Cardiol; 2016 May; 39(5):249-56. PubMed ID: 27080921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Combined stress myocardial CT perfusion and coronary CT angiography as a feasible strategy among patients presenting with acute chest pain to the emergency department.
    Grandhi GR; Batlle JC; Maroules CD; Janowitz W; Peña CS; Ziffer JA; Macedo R; Nasir K; Cury RC
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2021; 15(2):129-136. PubMed ID: 32807703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A simulation model of clinical and economic outcomes of cardiac CT triage of patients with acute chest pain in the emergency department.
    Goehler A; Ollendorf DA; Jaeger M; Ladapo J; Neumann T; Gazelle GS; Pearson SD
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Apr; 196(4):853-61. PubMed ID: 21427336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost-effectiveness of coronary CT angiography versus myocardial perfusion SPECT for evaluation of patients with chest pain and no known coronary artery disease.
    Min JK; Gilmore A; Budoff MJ; Berman DS; O'Day K
    Radiology; 2010 Mar; 254(3):801-8. PubMed ID: 20177094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sixty-four-slice computed tomography of the coronary arteries: cost-effectiveness analysis of patients presenting to the emergency department with low-risk chest pain.
    Khare RK; Courtney DM; Powell ES; Venkatesh AK; Lee TA
    Acad Emerg Med; 2008 Jul; 15(7):623-32. PubMed ID: 19086322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Potential cost effectiveness of initial myocardial perfusion imaging for assessment of emergency department patients with chest pain.
    Radensky PW; Hilton TC; Fulmer H; McLaughlin BA; Stowers SA
    Am J Cardiol; 1997 Mar; 79(5):595-9. PubMed ID: 9068515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cost-effectiveness of coronary CT angiography in patients with chest pain: Comparison with myocardial single photon emission tomography.
    Lee SP; Jang EJ; Kim YJ; Cha MJ; Park SY; Song HJ; Choi JE; Shim JI; Ahn J; Lee HJ
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2015; 9(5):428-37. PubMed ID: 25977116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost-effectiveness of a novel blood-pool contrast agent in the setting of chest pain evaluation in an emergency department.
    Espinosa G; Annapragada A
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Oct; 201(4):710-9. PubMed ID: 24059359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cost-effectiveness of a novel indication of computed tomography of the coronary arteries.
    Powell ES; Patterson BW; Venkatesh AK; Khare RK
    Crit Pathw Cardiol; 2012 Mar; 11(1):20-5. PubMed ID: 22337217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rationale and design of a randomized trial comparing initial stress echocardiography versus coronary CT angiography in low-to-intermediate risk emergency department patients with chest pain.
    Levsky JM; Haramati LB; Taub CC; Spevack DM; Menegus MA; Travin MI; Vega S; Lerer R; Brown-Manhertz D; Hirschhorn E; Tobin JN; Garcia MJ
    Echocardiography; 2014 Jul; 31(6):744-50. PubMed ID: 24372760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Multicenter, randomized trial of quantitative pretest probability to reduce unnecessary medical radiation exposure in emergency department patients with chest pain and dyspnea.
    Kline JA; Jones AE; Shapiro NI; Hernandez J; Hogg MM; Troyer J; Nelson RD
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2014 Jan; 7(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 24275953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diagnostic performance and cost of CT angiography versus stress ECG--a randomized prospective study of suspected acute coronary syndrome chest pain in the emergency department (CT-COMPARE).
    Hamilton-Craig C; Fifoot A; Hansen M; Pincus M; Chan J; Walters DL; Branch KR
    Int J Cardiol; 2014 Dec; 177(3):867-73. PubMed ID: 25466568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The optimal imaging strategy for patients with stable chest pain: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Genders TS; Petersen SE; Pugliese F; Dastidar AG; Fleischmann KE; Nieman K; Hunink MG
    Ann Intern Med; 2015 Apr; 162(7):474-84. PubMed ID: 25844996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Long-term health outcomes and cost-effectiveness of coronary CT angiography in patients with suspicion for acute coronary syndrome.
    Goehler A; Mayrhofer T; Pursnani A; Ferencik M; Lumish HS; Barth C; Karády J; Chow B; Truong QA; Udelson JE; Fleg JL; Nagurney JT; Gazelle GS; Hoffmann U
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2020; 14(1):44-54. PubMed ID: 31303580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimizing Evaluation of Patients with Low-to-Intermediate-Risk Acute Chest Pain: A Randomized Study Comparing Stress Myocardial Perfusion Tomography Incorporating Stress-Only Imaging Versus Cardiac CT.
    Nabi F; Kassi M; Muhyieddeen K; Chang SM; Xu J; Peterson LE; Wray NP; Shirkey BA; Ashton CM; Mahmarian JJ
    J Nucl Med; 2016 Mar; 57(3):378-84. PubMed ID: 26635341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Systematic review of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, and economic evaluation, of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy for the diagnosis and management of angina and myocardial infarction.
    Mowatt G; Vale L; Brazzelli M; Hernandez R; Murray A; Scott N; Fraser C; McKenzie L; Gemmell H; Hillis G; Metcalfe M
    Health Technol Assess; 2004 Jul; 8(30):iii-iv, 1-207. PubMed ID: 15248938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A time and imaging cost analysis of low-risk ED observation patients: a conservative 64-section computed tomography coronary angiography "triple rule-out" compared to nuclear stress test strategy.
    Takakuwa KM; Halpern EJ; Shofer FS
    Am J Emerg Med; 2011 Feb; 29(2):187-95. PubMed ID: 20825785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Coronary computed tomography angiography vs. myocardial single photon emission computed tomography in patients with intermediate risk chest pain: a randomized clinical trial for cost-effectiveness comparison based on real-world cost.
    Lee SP; Seo JK; Hwang IC; Park JB; Park EA; Lee W; Paeng JC; Lee HJ; Yoon YE; Kim HL; Koh E; Choi I; Choi JE; Kim YJ
    Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2019 Apr; 20(4):417-425. PubMed ID: 30052964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The CT-STAT (Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography for Systematic Triage of Acute Chest Pain Patients to Treatment) trial.
    Goldstein JA; Chinnaiyan KM; Abidov A; Achenbach S; Berman DS; Hayes SW; Hoffmann U; Lesser JR; Mikati IA; O'Neil BJ; Shaw LJ; Shen MY; Valeti US; Raff GL;
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2011 Sep; 58(14):1414-22. PubMed ID: 21939822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 40.