223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21568376)
21. The roles of fundamental frequency contours and sentence context in Mandarin Chinese speech intelligibility.
Wang J; Shu H; Zhang L; Liu Z; Zhang Y
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jul; 134(1):EL91-7. PubMed ID: 23862913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Improvement of intelligibility of ideal binary-masked noisy speech by adding background noise.
Cao S; Li L; Wu X
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Apr; 129(4):2227-36. PubMed ID: 21476677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The effects of reverberant self- and overlap-masking on speech recognition in cochlear implant listeners.
Desmond JM; Collins LM; Throckmorton CS
J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jun; 135(6):EL304-10. PubMed ID: 24907838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Noise signal reduction in cochlear implant speech processors].
Müller-Deile J
HNO; 1995 Sep; 43(9):545-51. PubMed ID: 7591867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Speech recognition in noise, temporal and spectral resolution in normal and impaired hearing.
Arlinger S; Dryselius H
Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1990; 469():30-7. PubMed ID: 2356736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The relative phonetic contributions of a cochlear implant and residual acoustic hearing to bimodal speech perception.
Sheffield BM; Zeng FG
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jan; 131(1):518-30. PubMed ID: 22280613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Use of S-shaped input-output functions for noise suppression in cochlear implants.
Kasturi K; Loizou PC
Ear Hear; 2007 Jun; 28(3):402-11. PubMed ID: 17485989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Auditory processing disorder and speech perception problems in noise: finding the underlying origin.
Lagacé J; Jutras B; Gagné JP
Am J Audiol; 2010 Jun; 19(1):17-25. PubMed ID: 20308289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Cochlear implants in post-lingually deafened patients.
Hiraumi H; Tsuji J; Kanemaru S; Fujino K; Ito J
Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 2007 Feb; (557):17-21. PubMed ID: 17453437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. BKB-SIN and ANL predict perceived communication ability in cochlear implant users.
Donaldson GS; Chisolm TH; Blasco GP; Shinnick LJ; Ketter KJ; Krause JC
Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):401-10. PubMed ID: 19390441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Spectral contrast enhancement of speech in noise for listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment: effects on intelligibility, quality, and response times.
Baer T; Moore BC; Gatehouse S
J Rehabil Res Dev; 1993; 30(1):49-72. PubMed ID: 8263829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Revisiting perceptual compensation for effects of reverberation in speech identification.
Nielsen JB; Dau T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Nov; 128(5):3088-94. PubMed ID: 21110604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The effects of fundamental frequency contour manipulations on speech intelligibility in background noise.
Miller SE; Schlauch RS; Watson PJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):435-43. PubMed ID: 20649237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The effect of spectral smearing on the identification of pure F0 intonation contours in vocoder simulations of cochlear implants.
van de Velde DJ; Dritsakis G; Frijns JH; van Heuven VJ; Schiller NO
Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Mar; 16(2):77-87. PubMed ID: 25001247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Spectral and temporal cues in cochlear implant speech perception.
Nie K; Barco A; Zeng FG
Ear Hear; 2006 Apr; 27(2):208-17. PubMed ID: 16518146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Speech Understanding With Various Maskers in Cochlear-Implant and Simulated Cochlear-Implant Hearing: Effects of Spectral Resolution and Implications for Masking Release.
Croghan NBH; Smith ZM
Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518787276. PubMed ID: 30022730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Computer-based auditory phoneme discrimination training improves speech recognition in noise in experienced adult cochlear implant listeners.
Schumann A; Serman M; Gefeller O; Hoppe U
Int J Audiol; 2015 Mar; 54(3):190-8. PubMed ID: 25549690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Localization in speech mixtures by listeners with hearing loss.
Best V; Carlile S; Kopco N; van Schaik A
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 May; 129(5):EL210-15. PubMed ID: 21568377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
