These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21568408)

  • 1. Relation between annoyance and single-number quantities for rating heavy-weight floor impact sound insulation in wooden houses.
    Ryu J; Sato H; Kurakata K; Hiramitsu A; Tanaka M; Hirota T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 May; 129(5):3047-55. PubMed ID: 21568408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of temporal decay on perception of heavy-weight floor impact sounds.
    Kim JH; Ryu JK; Jeon JY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Oct; 134(4):2730-8. PubMed ID: 24116411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluating standard airborne sound insulation measures in terms of annoyance, loudness, and audibility ratings.
    Park HK; Bradley JS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jul; 126(1):208-19. PubMed ID: 19603878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of annoyance from low frequency noise under laboratory conditions.
    Pawlaczyk-Luszczynska M; Dudarewicz A; Szymczak W; Sliwinska-Kowalska M
    Noise Health; 2010; 12(48):166-81. PubMed ID: 20603573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Annoyance from industrial noise: indicators for a wide variety of industrial sources.
    Alayrac M; Marquis-Favre C; Viollon S; Morel J; Le Nost G
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1128-39. PubMed ID: 20815449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of the temporal weighting of annoyance and loudness.
    Dittrich K; Oberfeld D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Dec; 126(6):3168-78. PubMed ID: 20000930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Loudness and annoyance of disturbing sounds - perception by normal hearing subjects.
    Skagerstrand Å; Köbler S; Stenfelt S
    Int J Audiol; 2017 Oct; 56(10):775-783. PubMed ID: 28485649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluating signal-to-noise ratios, loudness, and related measures as indicators of airborne sound insulation.
    Park HK; Bradley JS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Sep; 126(3):1219-30. PubMed ID: 19739735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating roadside noise barriers using an annoyance-reduction criterion.
    Nilsson ME; Andéhn M; Leśna P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):3561-7. PubMed ID: 19206785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A field study of the exposure-annoyance relationship of military shooting noise.
    Brink M; Wunderli JM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Apr; 127(4):2301-11. PubMed ID: 20370012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optimized single-number quantity for rating the airborne sound insulation of constructions: Living sounds.
    Virjonen P; Hongisto V; Oliva D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Dec; 140(6):4428. PubMed ID: 28040024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Assessment of low frequency noise annoyance in steering premises according to subjective annoyance rating by workers. A pilot study].
    Pawlaczyk-Łuszczyńska M; Dudarewicz A; Waszkowska M
    Med Pr; 2001; 52(6):465-70. PubMed ID: 11928677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The relation between psychoacoustical factors and annoyance under different noise reduction conditions for railway noise.
    Kasess CH; Maly T; Majdak P; Waubke H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 May; 141(5):3151. PubMed ID: 28599526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Subjective evaluation of heavy-weight floor impact sounds in relation to spatial characteristics.
    Jeon JY; Lee PJ; Kim JH; Yoo SY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):2987-94. PubMed ID: 19425642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using beamforming and binaural synthesis for the psychoacoustical evaluation of target sources in noise.
    Song W; Ellermeier W; Hald J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):910-24. PubMed ID: 18247894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Annoyance and discomfort during exposure to high-frequency noise from an ultrasonic washer.
    Holmberg K; Landström U; Nordström B
    Percept Mot Skills; 1995 Dec; 81(3 Pt 1):819-27. PubMed ID: 8668439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Psychoacoustic quantification of mechanical heart valve noise.
    Nielsen T; Nielsen TV; Johansen P; Hasenkam JM; Nygaard H
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jan; 14(1):89-95. PubMed ID: 15700442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of loudness-level weightings for assessing the annoyance of environmental noise.
    Schomer PD; Suzuki Y; Saito F
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Nov; 110(5 Pt 1):2390-7. PubMed ID: 11757929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sound quality characteristics of refrigerator noise in real living environments with relation to psychoacoustical and autocorrelation function parameters.
    Sato S; You J; Jeon JY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jul; 122(1):314-25. PubMed ID: 17614491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The annoyance of snoring and psychoacoustic parameters: a step towards an objective measurement.
    Rohrmeier C; Herzog M; Haubner F; Kuehnel TS
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2012 May; 269(5):1537-43. PubMed ID: 22167475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.