These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21568408)

  • 21. Spectral loudness summation for sequences of short noise bursts.
    Verhey JL; Uhlemann M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):925-34. PubMed ID: 18247895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A logistic prediction model for individual allowable noise levels.
    Furihata K
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):3544-60. PubMed ID: 19206784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An Optimization Study on Listening Experiments to Improve the Comparability of Annoyance Ratings of Noise Samples from Different Experimental Sample Sets.
    Di G; Lu K; Shi X
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Mar; 15(3):. PubMed ID: 29518036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Combined effect of noise and vibration produced by high-speed trains on annoyance in buildings.
    Lee PJ; Griffin MJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):2126-35. PubMed ID: 23556582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. On the suitability of ISO 16717-1 reference spectra for rating airborne sound insulation.
    Mašović DB; Pavlović DS; Mijić MM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Nov; 134(5):EL420-5. PubMed ID: 24181985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Evaluating noise in social context: the effect of procedural unfairness on noise annoyance judgments.
    Maris E; Stallen PJ; Vermunt R; Steensma H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Dec; 122(6):3483-94. PubMed ID: 18247757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The temporal weighting of loudness: effects of the level profile.
    Oberfeld D; Plank T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 Jan; 73(1):189-208. PubMed ID: 21258919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Differences in subjective loudness and annoyance depending on the road traffic noise spectrum.
    Torija AJ; Flindell IH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Jan; 135(1):1-4. PubMed ID: 24437739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of train type on annoyance and acoustic features of the rolling noise.
    Kasess CH; Noll A; Majdak P; Waubke H
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1071-81. PubMed ID: 23927107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Estimating occupant satisfaction of HVAC system noise using quality assessment index.
    Forouharmajd F; Nassiri P; Monazzam MR; Yazdchi M
    Noise Health; 2012; 14(59):135-9. PubMed ID: 22918142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Binaural loudness summation for speech and tones presented via earphones and loudspeakers.
    Epstein M; Florentine M
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):234-7. PubMed ID: 19194294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Optimized reference spectrum for rating the façade sound insulation.
    Virjonen P; Hongisto V; Mäkelä MM; Pahikkala T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Nov; 148(5):3107. PubMed ID: 33261368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Snoring noise pollution--the need for objective quantification of annoyance, regulatory guidelines and mandatory therapy for snoring.
    Caffier PP; Berl JC; Muggli A; Reinhardt A; Jakob A; Möser M; Fietze I; Scherer H; Hölzl M
    Physiol Meas; 2007 Jan; 28(1):25-40. PubMed ID: 17151417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Temporal weights in the level discrimination of time-varying sounds.
    Pedersen B; Ellermeier W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):963-72. PubMed ID: 18247899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Perceptual assessment of quality of urban soundscapes with combined noise sources and water sounds.
    Jeon JY; Lee PJ; You J; Kang J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Mar; 127(3):1357-66. PubMed ID: 20329835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Can surrounding greenery reduce noise annoyance at home?
    Li HN; Chau CK; Tang SK
    Sci Total Environ; 2010 Sep; 408(20):4376-84. PubMed ID: 20638105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Subjective and objective rating of the sound insulation of residential building façades against road traffic noise.
    Hongisto V; Oliva D; Rekola L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Aug; 144(2):1100. PubMed ID: 30180704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Long-term effects of noise reduction measures on noise annoyance and sleep disturbance: the Norwegian facade insulation study.
    Amundsen AH; Klæboe R; Aasvang GM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jun; 133(6):3921-8. PubMed ID: 23742346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Correspondences among pupillary dilation response, subjective salience of sounds, and loudness.
    Liao HI; Kidani S; Yoneya M; Kashino M; Furukawa S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Apr; 23(2):412-25. PubMed ID: 26163191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Proposed criteria for assessing low frequency noise annoyance in occupational settings.
    Pawlaczyk-Luszczyńska M; Szymczak W; Dudarewicz A; Sliwińska-Kowalska M
    Int J Occup Med Environ Health; 2006; 19(3):185-97. PubMed ID: 17252670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.