These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21568418)

  • 1. The psychophysics of absolute threshold and signal duration: a probabilistic approach.
    Meddis R; Lecluyse W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 May; 129(5):3153-65. PubMed ID: 21568418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Characterizing auditory processing and perception in individual listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Jepsen ML; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jan; 129(1):262-81. PubMed ID: 21303008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The binaural intelligibility level difference in hearing-impaired listeners: the role of supra-threshold deficits.
    Goverts ST; Houtgast T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 May; 127(5):3073-84. PubMed ID: 21117756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A probabilistic Poisson-based model accounts for an extensive set of absolute auditory threshold measurements.
    Heil P; Matysiak A; Neubauer H
    Hear Res; 2017 Sep; 353():135-161. PubMed ID: 28716582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of cochlear impairment and equivalent-threshold masking on psychoacoustic tuning curves.
    Florentine M
    Audiology; 1992; 31(5):241-53. PubMed ID: 1449429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Threshold estimation in adult normal- and impaired-hearing subjects using auditory steady-state responses.
    Hatzopoulos S; Prosser S; Ciorba A; Giarbini N; Kochanek K; Sliwa L; Skarzynski H; Martini A
    Med Sci Monit; 2010 Jan; 16(1):CR21-7. PubMed ID: 20037490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cochlear compression in listeners with moderate sensorineural hearing loss.
    Lopez-Poveda EA; Plack CJ; Meddis R; Blanco JL
    Hear Res; 2005 Jul; 205(1-2):172-83. PubMed ID: 15953526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Modelling detection thresholds for sounds repeated at different delays.
    Heil P; Verhey JL; Zoefel B
    Hear Res; 2013 Feb; 296():83-95. PubMed ID: 23268356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Infant air and bone conduction tone burst auditory brain stem responses for classification of hearing loss and the relationship to behavioral thresholds.
    Vander Werff KR; Prieve BA; Georgantas LM
    Ear Hear; 2009 Jun; 30(3):350-68. PubMed ID: 19322084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The relationship between stream segregation and frequency discrimination in normally hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.
    Rose MM; Moore BC
    Hear Res; 2005 Jun; 204(1-2):16-28. PubMed ID: 15925188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of the auditory periphery in comodulation detection difference and comodulation masking release.
    Buschermöhle M; Verhey JL; Feudel U; Freund JA
    Biol Cybern; 2007 Dec; 97(5-6):397-411. PubMed ID: 17924134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reaction time to 1- and 4-kHz tones as a function of sensation level in listeners with normal hearing.
    Epstein M; Florentine M
    Ear Hear; 2006 Aug; 27(4):424-9. PubMed ID: 16825891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A quantitative analysis of psychometric functions for different auditory tasks in gerbils.
    Gleich O; Hamann I; Kittel MC; Klump GM; Strutz J
    Hear Res; 2006 Oct; 220(1-2):27-37. PubMed ID: 16901665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Audibility-index predictions of normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners' performance on the connected speech test.
    Sherbecoe RL; Studebaker GA
    Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):71-88. PubMed ID: 12598814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of signal duration on the underwater detection thresholds of a harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) for single frequency-modulated tonal signals between 0.25 and 160 kHz.
    Kastelein RA; Hoek L; de Jong CA; Wensveen PJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Nov; 128(5):3211-22. PubMed ID: 21110616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Distortion product emissions and sensorineural hearing loss.
    Kimberley BP; Nelson DA
    J Otolaryngol; 1989 Dec; 18(7):365-9. PubMed ID: 2593222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Temporal summation in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Papsin BC; Abel SM
    J Otolaryngol; 1988 Apr; 17(2):93-100. PubMed ID: 3385874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Signal detection theoretical aspects of various threshold detection procedures].
    Ptok M
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2002 Jun; 81(6):395-9. PubMed ID: 12063624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Perception of clear fricatives by normal-hearing and simulated hearing-impaired listeners.
    Maniwa K; Jongman A; Wade T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1114-25. PubMed ID: 18247912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Decision processes at threshold levels during psychoacoustic testing].
    Ptok M
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2002 Oct; 81(10):696-701. PubMed ID: 12397518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.