These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21568418)

  • 21. Temporal integration in the gerbil: the effects of age, hearing loss and temporally unmodulated and modulated speech-like masker noises.
    Gleich O; Kittel MC; Klump GM; Strutz J
    Hear Res; 2007 Feb; 224(1-2):101-14. PubMed ID: 17223296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Continuous versus pulsed tones in audiometry.
    Burk MH; Wiley TL
    Am J Audiol; 2004 Jun; 13(1):54-61. PubMed ID: 15248804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Temporal integration of trains of tone pulses by normal and by cochlearly impaired listeners.
    Carlyon RP; Buus S; Florentine M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Jan; 87(1):260-8. PubMed ID: 2299037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Why longer song elements are easier to detect: threshold level-duration functions in the Great Tit and comparison with human data.
    Pohl NU; Slabbekoorn H; Neubauer H; Heil P; Klump GM; Langemann U
    J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol; 2013 Mar; 199(3):239-52. PubMed ID: 23338560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A cautionary note on the use of the adaptive up-down method.
    García-Pérez MA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):2098-107. PubMed ID: 21973364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Efficient across-frequency integration: evidence from psychometric functions.
    Hicks ML; Buus S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Jun; 107(6):3333-42. PubMed ID: 10875378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Absolute auditory threshold: testing the absolute.
    Heil P; Matysiak A
    Eur J Neurosci; 2020 Mar; 51(5):1224-1233. PubMed ID: 29094506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Threshold vs duration for Gaussian-shaped tone-pips of one to four periods duration.
    Nizami L
    Percept Mot Skills; 2004 Dec; 99(3 Pt 1):821-36. PubMed ID: 15648477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Selective adaptation to linear frequency-modulated sweeps: evidence for direction-specific FM channels?
    Wakefield GH; Viemeister NF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 May; 75(5):1588-92. PubMed ID: 6736421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Psychometric functions for gap detection in a yes-no procedure.
    Florentine M; Buus S; Geng W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Dec; 106(6):3512-20. PubMed ID: 10615691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Towards a unifying basis of auditory thresholds: Thresholds for multicomponent stimuli.
    Heil P; Mohamed ESI; Matysiak A
    Hear Res; 2021 Oct; 410():108349. PubMed ID: 34530356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Detection threshold microstructure and its effect on temporal integration data.
    Cohen MF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1982 Feb; 71(2):405-9. PubMed ID: 7069055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Three models of temporal summation evaluated using normal-hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.
    Gerken GM; Gunnarson AD; Allen CM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1983 Jun; 26(2):256-62. PubMed ID: 6887812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Stochastic undersampling steepens auditory threshold/duration functions: implications for understanding auditory deafferentation and aging.
    Marmel F; Rodríguez-Mendoza MA; Lopez-Poveda EA
    Front Aging Neurosci; 2015; 7():63. PubMed ID: 26029098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Estimating parameters for psychometric functions using the four-point sampling method.
    Lam CF; Dubno JR; Ahlstrom JB; He NJ; Mills JH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Dec; 102(6):3697-703. PubMed ID: 9407661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Maximum-likelihood yes-no procedure for gap detection: effect of track length.
    Florentine M; Marvit P; Buus S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2001 Mar; 12(3):113-20. PubMed ID: 11316048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A maximum-likelihood procedure for estimating psychometric functions: thresholds, slopes, and lapses of attention.
    Shen Y; Richards VM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):957-67. PubMed ID: 22894217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Stimulus selection in adaptive psychophysical procedures.
    Green DM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Jun; 87(6):2662-74. PubMed ID: 2373801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Signal detection theory and vestibular perception: III. Estimating unbiased fit parameters for psychometric functions.
    Chaudhuri SE; Merfeld DM
    Exp Brain Res; 2013 Mar; 225(1):133-46. PubMed ID: 23250442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Infant psychometric functions for detection: mechanisms of immature sensitivity.
    Bargones JY; Werner LA; Marean GC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Jul; 98(1):99-111. PubMed ID: 7608411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.