BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

379 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21568439)

  • 1. Identification of auditory distance cues by zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) and budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus).
    Radziwon KE; Welch TE; Cone JP; Dent ML
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 May; 129(5):3384-92. PubMed ID: 21568439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Franssen effect illusion in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) and zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata).
    Dent ML; McClaine EM; Welch TE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Dec; 122(6):3609-14. PubMed ID: 18247768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Species differences in the identification of acoustic stimuli by birds.
    Dent ML; Welch TE; McClaine EM; Shinn-Cunningham BG
    Behav Processes; 2008 Feb; 77(2):184-90. PubMed ID: 18164143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cues for auditory stream segregation of birdsong in budgerigars and zebra finches: Effects of location, timing, amplitude, and frequency.
    Dent ML; Martin AK; Flaherty MM; Neilans EG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Feb; 139(2):674-83. PubMed ID: 26936551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The discrimination of temporal fine structure in call-like harmonic sounds by birds.
    Lohr B; Dooling RJ; Bartone S
    J Comp Psychol; 2006 Aug; 120(3):239-51. PubMed ID: 16893261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Spatial unmasking of birdsong in zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) and budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus).
    Dent ML; McClaine EM; Best V; Ozmeral E; Narayan R; Gallun FJ; Sen K; Shinn-Cunningham BG
    J Comp Psychol; 2009 Nov; 123(4):357-67. PubMed ID: 19929104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of acoustic cue modifications on evoked vocal response to calls in zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata).
    Vignal C; Mathevon N
    J Comp Psychol; 2011 May; 125(2):150-61. PubMed ID: 21341908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Modulation of flight muscle power output in budgerigars Melopsittacus undulatus and zebra finches Taeniopygia guttata: in vitro muscle performance.
    Ellerby DJ; Askew GN
    J Exp Biol; 2007 Nov; 210(Pt 21):3780-8. PubMed ID: 17951419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Perception of distance calls by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) and zebra finches (Poephila guttata): assessing species-specific advantages.
    Okanoya K; Dooling RJ
    J Comp Psychol; 1991 Mar; 105(1):60-72. PubMed ID: 2032457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The disassociation of visual and acoustic conspecific cues decreases discrimination by female zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata).
    Campbell DL; Hauber ME
    J Comp Psychol; 2009 Aug; 123(3):310-5. PubMed ID: 19685973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The precedence effect in three species of birds (Melopsittacus undulatus, Serinus canaria, and Taeniopygia guttata).
    Dent ML; Dooling RJ
    J Comp Psychol; 2004 Sep; 118(3):325-31. PubMed ID: 15482060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cross-fostering diminishes song discrimination in zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata).
    Campbell DL; Hauber ME
    Anim Cogn; 2009 May; 12(3):481-90. PubMed ID: 19130101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sound order discrimination in two species of birds-Taeniopygia guttata and Melopsittacus undulatus.
    Stennette KA; Fishbein A; Prior N; Ball GF; Dooling RJ
    J Comp Psychol; 2023 Feb; 137(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 36931835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Perception of vocal signals by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus).
    Dooling RJ
    Exp Biol; 1986; 45(3):195-218. PubMed ID: 3732497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparisons of different methods to train a young zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata) to learn a song.
    Derégnaucourt S; Poirier C; Kant AV; Linden AV; Gahr M
    J Physiol Paris; 2013 Jun; 107(3):210-8. PubMed ID: 22982543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Frequency-range discriminations and absolute pitch in black-capped chickadees (Poecile atricapillus), mountain chickadees (Poecile gambeli), and zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata).
    Lee TT; Charrier I; Bloomfield LL; Weisman RG; Sturdy CB
    J Comp Psychol; 2006 Aug; 120(3):217-28. PubMed ID: 16893259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perception of species-specific contact calls by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus).
    Park TJ; Dooling RJ
    J Comp Psychol; 1985 Dec; 99(4):391-402. PubMed ID: 4075778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Sound sequences in birdsong: how much do birds really care?
    Fishbein AR; Idsardi WJ; Ball GF; Dooling RJ
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2020 Jan; 375(1789):20190044. PubMed ID: 31735149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lateralization of acoustic signals by dichotically listening budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus).
    Welch TE; Dent ML
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Oct; 130(4):2293-301. PubMed ID: 21973385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Detection of changes in timbre and harmonicity in complex sounds by zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) and budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus).
    Lohr B; Dooling RJ
    J Comp Psychol; 1998 Mar; 112(1):36-47. PubMed ID: 9528113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.