These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21569049)

  • 1. Woulda, coulda, shoulda: the evaluation and the impact of the alternative outcome.
    Gu R; Wu T; Jiang Y; Luo YJ
    Psychophysiology; 2011 Oct; 48(10):1354-60. PubMed ID: 21569049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Decision- and feedback-related brain potentials reveal risk processing mechanisms in patients with alcohol use disorder.
    Sehrig S; Weiss A; Miller GA; Rockstroh B
    Psychophysiology; 2019 Dec; 56(12):e13450. PubMed ID: 31380569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Alternative outcomes create biased expectations regarding the received outcome: Evidence from event-related potentials.
    Marciano D; Bentin S; Deouell LY
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 May; 113():126-139. PubMed ID: 29567108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Exploring the valence-framing effect: Gain frame enhances behavioral and brain sensitivity to the failure of decision-making under uncertainty.
    Xu S; Wang M; Liu Q; Wang C; Zhang C
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2020 Jul; 153():166-172. PubMed ID: 32445657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Differentiating the influence of incidental anger and fear on risk decision-making.
    Yang Q; Zhao D; Wu Y; Tang P; Gu R; Luo YJ
    Physiol Behav; 2018 Feb; 184():179-188. PubMed ID: 29196018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The impact of advice distance on advice taking: Evidence from an ERP study.
    Du X; Ren Y; Wu S; Wu Y
    Neuropsychologia; 2019 Jun; 129():56-64. PubMed ID: 30831118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Give it a second try? The influence of feedback and performance in the decision of reattempting.
    Chung WY; Darriba Á; Yeung N; Waszak F
    Cognition; 2024 Jul; 248():105803. PubMed ID: 38703619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Valence and magnitude ambiguity in feedback processing.
    Gu R; Feng X; Broster LS; Yuan L; Xu P; Luo YJ
    Brain Behav; 2017 May; 7(5):e00672. PubMed ID: 28523218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Your losses are mine: The influence of empathic concern on evaluative processing of others' outcomes.
    Liu X; Hu X; Shi K; Mai X
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2020 Jun; 20(3):481-492. PubMed ID: 32124255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Manipulation of feedback expectancy and valence induces negative and positive reward prediction error signals manifest in event-related brain potentials.
    Pfabigan DM; Alexopoulos J; Bauer H; Sailer U
    Psychophysiology; 2011 May; 48(5):656-64. PubMed ID: 21039585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dissociating absolute and relative reward- and punishment-related electrocortical processing: An event-related potential study.
    Wischnewski M; Schutter DJLG
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Apr; 126():13-19. PubMed ID: 29481828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Behavioural and neural limits in competitive decision making: The roles of outcome, opponency and observation.
    Dyson BJ; Steward BA; Meneghetti T; Forder L
    Biol Psychol; 2020 Jan; 149():107778. PubMed ID: 31593749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Feedback-related negativity (FRN) and theta oscillations: Different feedback signals for non-conform and conform decisions.
    Wang Y; Cheung H; Yee LTS; Tse CY
    Biol Psychol; 2020 May; 153():107880. PubMed ID: 32169532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Representing the consequences of our actions trial by trial: Complex and flexible encoding of feedback valence and magnitude.
    Padrón I; Fernández-Rey J; Acuña C; Pardo-Vazquez JL
    Neuroscience; 2016 Oct; 333():264-76. PubMed ID: 27457038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Incidental emotions influence risk preference and outcome evaluation.
    Zhao D; Gu R; Tang P; Yang Q; Luo YJ
    Psychophysiology; 2016 Oct; 53(10):1542-51. PubMed ID: 27354122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of loss aversion on neural responses to loss outcomes: An event-related potential study.
    Kokmotou K; Cook S; Xie Y; Wright H; Soto V; Fallon N; Giesbrecht T; Pantelous A; Stancak A
    Biol Psychol; 2017 May; 126():30-40. PubMed ID: 28396213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perceptual properties of feedback stimuli influence the feedback-related negativity in the flanker gambling task.
    Liu Y; Nelson LD; Bernat EM; Gehring WJ
    Psychophysiology; 2014 Aug; 51(8):782-8. PubMed ID: 24673119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Paying out one versus paying out all trials and the decrease in behavioral and brain activity in the Balloon Analogue Risk Task.
    Xu S; Wang H; Wang C
    Psychophysiology; 2020 Mar; 57(3):e13510. PubMed ID: 31793670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Beyond the FRN: Broadening the time-course of EEG and ERP components implicated in reward processing.
    Glazer JE; Kelley NJ; Pornpattananangkul N; Mittal VA; Nusslock R
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Oct; 132(Pt B):184-202. PubMed ID: 29454641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Event-related potentials in response to feedback following risk-taking in the hot version of the Columbia Card Task.
    de Groot K; van Strien JW
    Psychophysiology; 2019 Sep; 56(9):e13390. PubMed ID: 31069812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.