These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21569920)

  • 21. Humphrey matrix frequency doubling perimetry for detection of visual-field defects in open-angle glaucoma.
    Clement CI; Goldberg I; Healey PR; Graham S
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 May; 93(5):582-8. PubMed ID: 18669543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Frequency doubling perimetry and short-wavelength automated perimetry to detect early glaucoma.
    Leeprechanon N; Giaconi JA; Manassakorn A; Hoffman D; Caprioli J
    Ophthalmology; 2007 May; 114(5):931-7. PubMed ID: 17397926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Pulsar perimetry. A review and new results].
    Gonzalez de la Rosa M; Gonzalez-Hernandez M
    Ophthalmologe; 2013 Feb; 110(2):107-15. PubMed ID: 23392836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Multifocal blue-on-yellow visual evoked potentials in early glaucoma.
    Klistorner A; Graham SL; Martins A; Grigg JR; Arvind H; Kumar RS; James AC; Billson FA
    Ophthalmology; 2007 Sep; 114(9):1613-21. PubMed ID: 17822971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Blue-on-yellow visual field and retinal nerve fiber layer in ocular hypertension and glaucoma.
    Teesalu P; Airaksinen PJ; Tuulonen A
    Ophthalmology; 1998 Nov; 105(11):2077-81. PubMed ID: 9818609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The ability of short-wavelength automated perimetry to predict conversion to glaucoma.
    van der Schoot J; Reus NJ; Colen TP; Lemij HG
    Ophthalmology; 2010 Jan; 117(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 19896194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Diagnostic sensitivity of fast blue-yellow and standard automated perimetry in early glaucoma: a comparison between different test programs.
    Bengtsson B; Heijl A
    Ophthalmology; 2006 Jul; 113(7):1092-7. PubMed ID: 16815399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Rarebit perimetry for bedside testing: comparison with standard automated perimetry.
    Steven Houston SK; Weber ED; Koga SF; Newman SA
    J Neuroophthalmol; 2010 Sep; 30(3):243-7. PubMed ID: 20548245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Variability components of standard automated perimetry and frequency-doubling technology perimetry.
    Spry PG; Johnson CA; McKendrick AM; Turpin A
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2001 May; 42(6):1404-10. PubMed ID: 11328758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Flicker perimetry in glaucoma].
    Göbel K
    Ophthalmologe; 2013 Feb; 110(2):105-6. PubMed ID: 23299248
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Short wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP) in ophthalmic practice.
    Demirel S; Johnson CA
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1996 Aug; 67(8):451-6. PubMed ID: 8888875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Selective perimetry in glaucoma diagnosis.
    Sakata LM; DeLeón-Ortega J; Girkin CA
    Curr Opin Ophthalmol; 2007 Mar; 18(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 17301612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Humphrey visual field and frequency doubling perimetry in the diagnosis of early glaucoma.
    Chandrasekhar G; Kunjam V; Rao VS; Nutheti R
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2003 Mar; 51(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 12701860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Short-wavelength automated perimetry and frequency-doubling technology perimetry in glaucoma.
    Fogagnolo P; Rossetti L; Ranno S; Ferreras A; Orzalesi N
    Prog Brain Res; 2008; 173():101-24. PubMed ID: 18929104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Comparison of the Results of the Flicker Perimetry (Prototype versus Commercial Perimeter)].
    Zimmermann N; Hess A; Erb C
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2017 Sep; 234(9):1169-1173. PubMed ID: 27508889
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Repeatability of the Glaucoma Hemifield Test in automated perimetry.
    Katz J; Quigley HA; Sommer A
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1995 Jul; 36(8):1658-64. PubMed ID: 7601645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Blue-yellow full threshold automated perimetry in glaucoma diagnosis].
    Bobeico V; Zemba M; Brătulescu M; Ciucă C; Popescu M
    Oftalmologia; 2002; 55(4):18-24. PubMed ID: 12723172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Frequency doubling technology perimetry in open-angle glaucoma eyes with hemifield visual field damage: comparison of high-tension and normal-tension groups.
    Murata H; Tomidokoro A; Matsuo H; Tomita G; Araie M
    J Glaucoma; 2007 Jan; 16(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 17224743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Validation of test duration as a screening criterion for frequency doubling perimetry.
    Thomas R; Parikh R; Muliyil J; Bhat S; George R
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Mar; 137(3):562-3. PubMed ID: 15013885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Sensitivity and specificity of frequency-doubling technology, tendency-oriented perimetry, SITA Standard and SITA Fast perimetry in perimetrically inexperienced individuals.
    Pierre-Filho Pde T; Schimiti RB; de Vasconcellos JP; Costa VP
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2006 Jun; 84(3):345-50. PubMed ID: 16704696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.