BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21570363)

  • 1. Canadian hysterectomy educational experience: survey of recent graduates in obstetrics and gynecology.
    Kroft J; Moody JR; Lee P
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2011; 18(4):438-44. PubMed ID: 21570363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Trends in reported resident surgical experience in hysterectomy.
    Washburn EE; Cohen SL; Manoucheri E; Zurawin RK; Einarsson JI
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(6):1067-70. PubMed ID: 24907549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Incidence and patient characteristics of vaginal cuff dehiscence after different modes of hysterectomies.
    Hur HC; Guido RS; Mansuria SM; Hacker MR; Sanfilippo JS; Lee TT
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(3):311-7. PubMed ID: 17478361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Current cystoscopy practice of recent graduates of obstetrics and gynecology residency: a survey study.
    Nosti PA; Isaacson MA; Iglesia CB
    J Reprod Med; 2011; 56(9-10):373-5. PubMed ID: 22010518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Resident duty-hour restrictions and their effect on operative experience in obstetrics and gynecology.
    Occhino JA; Hannigan TL; Baggish MS; Gebhart JB
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2011; 72(2):73-8. PubMed ID: 21849756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hysterectomy Volume Among Recent Obstetrics and Gynecology Residency Graduates.
    Cadish LA; Kropat G; Muffly TM
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2021 Jun; 27(6):382-387. PubMed ID: 32371719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Resident and Program Director Confidence in Resident Surgical Preparedness in Obstetrics and Gynecologic Training Programs.
    Banks E; Gressel GM; George K; Woodland MB
    Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Aug; 136(2):369-376. PubMed ID: 32649501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The use of lightly embalmed (fresh tissue) cadavers for resident laparoscopic training.
    Levine RL; Kives S; Cathey G; Blinchevsky A; Acland R; Thompson C; Pasic R
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2006; 13(5):451-6. PubMed ID: 16962531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Laparoscopy vs. laparotomy for gynecologic procedures. Impact on resident training.
    Sultana CJ; Sogor L
    J Reprod Med; 1996 Apr; 41(4):225-30. PubMed ID: 8728072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impact of robotic surgery on obstetric-gynecologic resident training.
    Brenot K; Goyert GL
    J Reprod Med; 2009; 54(11-12):675-7. PubMed ID: 20120900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing current trends in resident hysterectomy training.
    Burkett D; Horwitz J; Kennedy V; Murphy D; Graziano S; Kenton K
    Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg; 2011 Sep; 17(5):210-4. PubMed ID: 22453103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An evaluation of the resident learning curve in performing laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomies as compared with patient outcome: five-year experience.
    Ascher-Walsh CJ; Capes T
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(6):719-23. PubMed ID: 17980332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hysterectomy Route and Numbers Reported by Graduating Residents in Obstetrics and Gynecology Training Programs.
    Gressel GM; Potts JR; Cha S; Valea FA; Banks E
    Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Feb; 135(2):268-273. PubMed ID: 31923067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing Resident Surgical Volume Before and After Initiation of a Female Pelvic Medicine and Reconstructive Surgery Fellowship.
    Chaudhry Z; Tarnay CM
    J Surg Educ; 2017; 74(3):450-454. PubMed ID: 27988170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Why has the acceptance of laparoscopic hysterectomy been slow? Results of an anonymous survey of Australian gynecologists.
    Englund M; Robson S
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(6):724-8. PubMed ID: 17980333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A series of 3190 laparoscopic hysterectomies for benign disease from 1990 to 2006: evaluation of complications compared with vaginal and abdominal procedures.
    Donnez O; Jadoul P; Squifflet J; Donnez J
    BJOG; 2009 Mar; 116(4):492-500. PubMed ID: 19016683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A low-fidelity total abdominal hysterectomy teaching model for obstetrics and gynecology residents.
    Hong A; Mullin PM; Al-Marayati L; Peyre SE; Muderspach L; Macdonald H; Ouzounian JG; Miller DA; Opper N; Lee RH
    Simul Healthc; 2012 Apr; 7(2):123-6. PubMed ID: 22286555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of laparoscopy-assisted hysterectomies with conventional hysterectomies.
    Abdollahi SF; Bahlouli A; Mostafa PG; Rasooli S; Morteza G
    Saudi Med J; 2009 Jun; 30(6):813-6. PubMed ID: 19526166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of robotic surgery on hysterectomy trends: implications for resident education.
    Yamasato K; Casey D; Kaneshiro B; Hiraoka M
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(3):399-405. PubMed ID: 24172026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Variability in gynecologic case volume of obstetrician-gynecologist residents graduating from 2009 to 2017.
    Hall EF; Raker CA; Hampton BS
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Jun; 222(6):617.e1-617.e8. PubMed ID: 31765644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.