245 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21570638)
1. A principled approach to setting optimal diagnostic thresholds: where ROC and indifference curves meet.
Irwin RJ; Irwin TC
Eur J Intern Med; 2011 Jun; 22(3):230-4. PubMed ID: 21570638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Advantages to transforming the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve into likelihood ratio co-ordinates.
Johnson NP
Stat Med; 2004 Jul; 23(14):2257-66. PubMed ID: 15236429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The partial area under the summary ROC curve.
Walter SD
Stat Med; 2005 Jul; 24(13):2025-40. PubMed ID: 15900606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the definition of threshold levels to diagnose coronary artery disease on electrocardiographic stress testing. Part I: The use of ROC curves in diagnostic medicine and electrocardiographic markers of ischaemia.
Barnabei L; Marazìa S; De Caterina R
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2007 Nov; 8(11):873-81. PubMed ID: 17906471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [ROC (receiver operating characteristics) curve: principles and application in biology].
Delacour H; Servonnet A; Perrot A; Vigezzi JF; Ramirez JM
Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2005; 63(2):145-54. PubMed ID: 15771972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An enhancement of ROC curves made them clinically relevant for diagnostic-test comparison and optimal-threshold determination.
Subtil F; Rabilloud M
J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Jul; 68(7):752-9. PubMed ID: 25660050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and the definition of threshold levels to diagnose coronary artery disease on electrocardiographic stress testing. Part II: the use of ROC curves in the choice of electrocardiographic stress test markers of ischaemia.
Marazìa S; Barnabei L; De Caterina R
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2008 Jan; 9(1):22-31. PubMed ID: 18268415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Advantages to transforming the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve into likelihood ratio co-ordinates.
Fosgate GT
Stat Med; 2005 Apr; 24(8):1287-8; author reply 1288. PubMed ID: 15765500
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A preference-based measure for test performance with an application to prenatal diagnostics.
Felder S; Robra BP
Stat Med; 2006 Nov; 25(21):3696-706. PubMed ID: 16345129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A new parametric method based on S-distributions for computing receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
Sorribas A; March J; Trujillano J
Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(9):1213-35. PubMed ID: 12111875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Evaluation of diagnostic tests performance: the ROC curve].
Van Meerhaeghe A
Rev Med Brux; 2002 Apr; 23(2):92-5. PubMed ID: 12056064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. On the exact interval estimation for the difference in paired areas under the ROC curves.
Li CR; Liao CT; Liu JP
Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(2):224-42. PubMed ID: 17139702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Best combination of multiple diagnostic tests for screening purposes.
Qin J; Zhang B
Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(28):2905-19. PubMed ID: 20862668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The agreement chart as an alternative to the receiver-operating characteristic curve for diagnostic tests.
Bangdiwala SI; Haedo AS; Natal ML; Villaveces A
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Sep; 61(9):866-74. PubMed ID: 18687288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Confidence intervals around Bayes Cost in multi-state diagnostic settings to estimate optimal performance.
Batterton KA; Schubert CM
Stat Med; 2014 Aug; 33(19):3280-99. PubMed ID: 24763997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Wilcoxon-based group sequential designs for comparison of areas under two correlated ROC curves.
Zhou XH; Li SM; Gatsonis CA
Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(2):213-23. PubMed ID: 17357988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluating diagnostic tests: The area under the ROC curve and the balance of errors.
Hand DJ
Stat Med; 2010 Jun; 29(14):1502-10. PubMed ID: 20087877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of a sequence of tests.
Thompson ML
Biostatistics; 2003 Jul; 4(3):341-51. PubMed ID: 12925502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic tests: a statistical review.
Schulzer M
Muscle Nerve; 1994 Jul; 17(7):815-9. PubMed ID: 8008012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Application of ROC curve analysis to FAMACHA© evaluation of haemonchosis on two sheep farms in South Africa.
Reynecke DP; Van Wyk JA; Gummow B; Dorny P; Boomker J
Vet Parasitol; 2011 May; 177(3-4):224-30. PubMed ID: 21334814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
