BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21570641)

  • 1. Comparison between arterial and capillary blood glucose monitoring in patients with shock.
    Juneja D; Pandey R; Singh O
    Eur J Intern Med; 2011 Jun; 22(3):241-4. PubMed ID: 21570641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relative accuracy of arterial and capillary glucose meter measurements in critically ill patients.
    Lonjaret L; Claverie V; Berard E; Riu-Poulenc B; Geeraerts T; Genestal M; Fourcade O
    Diabetes Metab; 2012 Jun; 38(3):230-5. PubMed ID: 22342294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tale of two sites: capillary versus arterial blood glucose testing in the operating room.
    Akinbami F; Segal S; Schnipper JL; Stopfkuchen-Evans M; Mills J; Rogers SO
    Am J Surg; 2012 Apr; 203(4):423-7. PubMed ID: 22365099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of bedside glucometry in critically ill patients: influence of clinical characteristics and perfusion index.
    Desachy A; Vuagnat AC; Ghazali AD; Baudin OT; Longuet OH; Calvat SN; Gissot V
    Mayo Clin Proc; 2008 Apr; 83(4):400-5. PubMed ID: 18380985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Evaluation of accuracy and influence factors of bedside blood glucose monitoring in critically ill patients].
    Feng T; Cao XY
    Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue; 2012 Aug; 24(8):482-6. PubMed ID: 22871408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Who says bedside glucose measurement is simple (or always accurate)?
    Rice MJ; Pitkin AD; Gravenstein N; Coursin DB
    Crit Care Med; 2010 Mar; 38(3):1013; author reply 1013. PubMed ID: 20168175
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bedside capillary blood glucose measurements in critically ill patients: influence of catecholamine therapy.
    Fekih Hassen M; Ayed S; Gharbi R; Ben Sik Ali H; Marghli S; Elatrous S
    Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2010 Jan; 87(1):87-91. PubMed ID: 19853946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of a continuous glucose monitor in an unselected general intensive care population.
    Price GC; Stevenson K; Walsh TS
    Crit Care Resusc; 2008 Sep; 10(3):209-16. PubMed ID: 18798719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Diagnostic aspects and analytical problems of glycemia monitoring in intensive care unit patients].
    Solnica B
    Przegl Lek; 2006; 63(9):792-6. PubMed ID: 17479872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of bedside and laboratory blood glucose estimations in critically ill children with shock.
    Ramachandran B; Sethuraman R; Ravikumar KG; Kissoon N
    Pediatr Crit Care Med; 2011 Nov; 12(6):e297-301. PubMed ID: 21478799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical impact of improved point-of-care glucose monitoring in neonatal intensive care using Nova StatStrip: Evidence for improved accuracy, better sensitivity, and reduced test utilization.
    Raizman JE; Shea J; Daly CH; Karbasy K; Ariadne P; Chen Y; Henderson T; Redmond S; Silverman S; Moore AM; Adeli K
    Clin Biochem; 2016 Aug; 49(12):879-84. PubMed ID: 27157715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Continuous tissue glucose monitoring correlates with measurement of intermittent capillary glucose in patients with distributive shock.
    Ballesteros D; Martínez Ó; Blancas Gómez-Casero R; Martín Parra C; López Matamala B; Estébanez B; Chana M
    Med Intensiva; 2015 Oct; 39(7):405-11. PubMed ID: 25499901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Glucose control in the intensive care unit.
    Fahy BG; Sheehy AM; Coursin DB
    Crit Care Med; 2009 May; 37(5):1769-76. PubMed ID: 19325461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The impact of the severity of sepsis on the risk of hypoglycaemia and glycaemic variability.
    Waeschle RM; Moerer O; Hilgers R; Herrmann P; Neumann P; Quintel M
    Crit Care; 2008; 12(5):R129. PubMed ID: 18939991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validation of an insulin infusion nomogram for intensive glucose control in critically ill patients.
    Chant C; Wilson G; Friedrich JO
    Pharmacotherapy; 2005 Mar; 25(3):352-9. PubMed ID: 15843282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How "sweet" complexity is and how "bitter" variability can be; the new aspect of intensive care unit hyperglycemia.
    Freire AX; Murillo LC
    Crit Care Med; 2010 Mar; 38(3):996-7. PubMed ID: 20168163
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of a continuous glucose monitoring system compared with an in-house standard laboratory assay and a handheld point-of-care glucometer in critically ill neonatal foals.
    Hug SA; Riond B; Schwarzwald CC
    J Vet Emerg Crit Care (San Antonio); 2013; 23(4):408-15. PubMed ID: 23859299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accuracy of bedside glucose measurement from three glucometers in critically ill patients.
    Hoedemaekers CW; Klein Gunnewiek JM; Prinsen MA; Willems JL; Van der Hoeven JG
    Crit Care Med; 2008 Nov; 36(11):3062-6. PubMed ID: 18824915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Patient assessment. Part 4 - blood glucose testing.
    Higgins D
    Nurs Times; 2008 Mar 11-17; 104(10):24-5. PubMed ID: 18416397
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adherence to and efficacy and safety of an insulin protocol in the critically ill: a prospective observational study.
    Oeyen SG; Hoste EA; Roosens CD; Decruyenaere JM; Blot SI
    Am J Crit Care; 2007 Nov; 16(6):599-608. PubMed ID: 17962504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.