BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

250 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21571729)

  • 1. Safety and feasibility of transradial approach for coronary bypass graft angiography and intervention.
    Han H; Zhou Y; Ma H; Liu Y; Shi D; Zhao Y; Yan Z; Gao F; Liu X; Yang S; Jia D; Shen H
    Angiology; 2012 Feb; 63(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 21571729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A randomized comparison of the transradial and transfemoral approaches for coronary artery bypass graft angiography and intervention: the RADIAL-CABG Trial (RADIAL Versus Femoral Access for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Angiography and Intervention).
    Michael TT; Alomar M; Papayannis A; Mogabgab O; Patel VG; Rangan BV; Luna M; Hastings JL; Grodin J; Abdullah S; Banerjee S; Brilakis ES
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Nov; 6(11):1138-44. PubMed ID: 24139930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Transradial cardiac catheterization in patients with coronary bypass grafts: feasibility analysis and comparison with transfemoral approach.
    Sanmartin M; Cuevas D; Moxica J; Valdes M; Esparza J; Baz JA; Mantilla R; Iñiguez A
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2006 Apr; 67(4):580-4. PubMed ID: 16547928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Safety and feasibility of transradial approach for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction.
    Yan ZX; Zhou YJ; Zhao YX; Liu YY; Shi DM; Guo YH; Cheng WJ
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2008 May; 121(9):782-6. PubMed ID: 18701040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of the transradial and transfemoral approaches for the angiography and intervention in patients with a history of coronary artery bypass surgery: in-hospital and 1-year follow-up results.
    He PY; Yang YJ; Qiao SB; Xu B; Yao M; Wu YJ; Yuan JQ; Chen J; Liu HB; Dai J; Tang XR; Wang Y; Li W; Gao RL
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2015 Mar; 128(6):762-7. PubMed ID: 25758269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Full conversion from transfemoral to transradial approach for percutaneous coronary interventions results in a similar success rate and a rapid reduction of in-hospital cardiac and vascular major events.
    Dangoisse V; Guédès A; Gabriel L; Jamart J; Chenu P; Marchandise B; Schroeder E
    EuroIntervention; 2013 Jul; 9(3):345-52. PubMed ID: 23872649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rapid cycle change to predominantly radial access coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention: effect on vascular access site complications.
    Nadarasa K; Robertson MC; Wong CK; Green BK; Chen VH; Wilkins GT; Williams MJ
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Mar; 79(4):589-94. PubMed ID: 21523899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A randomized comparison of transradial versus transfemoral approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty.
    Brueck M; Bandorski D; Kramer W; Wieczorek M; Höltgen R; Tillmanns H
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Nov; 2(11):1047-54. PubMed ID: 19926042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Does transradial cardiac catheterization affect coronary artery bypass grafting?].
    Hamasaki A; Yaginuma G; Watanabe S; Kawarai S; Kawahara Y; Tanaka D; Meguro T
    Kyobu Geka; 2008 Jun; 61(6):433-6; discussion 437-9. PubMed ID: 18536288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Risk score, causes, and clinical impact of failure of transradial approach for percutaneous coronary interventions.
    Abdelaal E; Brousseau-Provencher C; Montminy S; Plourde G; MacHaalany J; Bataille Y; Molin P; Déry JP; Barbeau G; Roy L; Larose É; De Larochellière R; Nguyen CM; Proulx G; Costerousse O; Bertrand OF;
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Nov; 6(11):1129-37. PubMed ID: 24139933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is percutaneous coronary intervention of unprotected left main coronary artery via transradial approach feasible for skilled transfemoral operators? Initial experience in an unselected population.
    Tomassini F; Gagnor A; Montali N; Gambino A; Bollati M; Infantino V; Tizzani E; Varbella F
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2013; 14(4):193-6. PubMed ID: 23768506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Safety and efficacy of the percutaneous radial artery approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty in the elderly.
    Molinari G; Nicoletti I; De Benedictis M; Terraneo C; Morando G; Turri M; Anselmi M; Zardini P; Menegatti G; Vassanelli C
    J Invasive Cardiol; 2005 Dec; 17(12):651-4. PubMed ID: 16327046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Immediate results of percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected left main coronary artery stenoses: transradial versus transfemoral approach.
    Hsueh SK; Hsieh YK; Wu CJ; Fang CY; Youssef AA; Chen CJ; Chen SM; Yang CH; Yip HK; Chen MC; Fu M; Cheng CI
    Chang Gung Med J; 2008; 31(2):190-200. PubMed ID: 18567420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Safety and efficacy of transradial aortoiliac interventions.
    Staniloae CS; Korabathina R; Yu J; Kurian D; Coppola J
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Apr; 75(5):659-62. PubMed ID: 20088010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The feasibility of percutaneous transradial coronary intervention for saphenous vein graft lesions and comparison with transfemoral route.
    Rathore S; Roberts E; Hakeem AR; Pauriah M; Beaumont A; Morris JL
    J Interv Cardiol; 2009 Aug; 22(4):336-40. PubMed ID: 19689657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Radial vs femoral approach with StarClose clip placement for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. RADIAMI II: a prospective, randomised, single centre trial.
    Chodór P; Kurek T; Kowalczuk A; Świerad M; Wąs T; Honisz G; Świątkowski A; Streb W; Kalarus Z
    Kardiol Pol; 2011; 69(8):763-71. PubMed ID: 21850615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Operator learning curve for transradial percutaneous coronary interventions: implications for the initiation of a transradial access program in contemporary US practice.
    Barbash IM; Minha S; Gallino R; Lager R; Badr S; Loh JP; Kitabata H; Pendyala LK; Torguson R; Satler LF; Pichard AD; Waksman R
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2014 Jun; 15(4):195-9. PubMed ID: 24746598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Transulnar approach as an alternative access site for coronary invasive procedures after transradial approach failure.
    de Andrade PB; Tebet MA; Nogueira EF; Esteves VC; de Andrade MV; Labrunie A; Piva e Mattos LA
    Am Heart J; 2012 Oct; 164(4):462-7. PubMed ID: 23067902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Transradial primary angioplasty and stenting in Indian patients with acute myocardial infarction: acute results and 6-month follow-up.
    Ranjan A; Patel TM; Shah SC; Malhotra H; Patel R; Vayada N; Pothiwala R; Fonseca K; Tanwar NS
    Indian Heart J; 2005; 57(6):681-7. PubMed ID: 16521638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative study on transradial versus transfemoral approach for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in Chinese patients with acute myocardial infarction.
    Hou L; Wei YD; Li WM; Xu YW
    Saudi Med J; 2010 Feb; 31(2):158-62. PubMed ID: 20174731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.