These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21572257)
21. Research reports of nurses from non-Western countries. Simpson SH Cancer Nurs; 2009; 32(3):175-6. PubMed ID: 19411935 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Publication ethics. Hays JC Public Health Nurs; 2009; 26(3):205-6. PubMed ID: 19386055 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Why manuscript formatting can reduce you to a whiny 4-year-old. Overstreet K J Spec Pediatr Nurs; 2010 Jan; 15(1):4-5. PubMed ID: 20074108 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Publishing and getting published. Gardner G Collegian; 2003 Jan; 10(1):4-5. PubMed ID: 15534956 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Stewards of the discipline: The role of referees and peer review. Broome ME Nurs Outlook; 2010; 58(4):169-70. PubMed ID: 20637926 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Am I flogging a dead metaphor? Sloppy scholarship and the implied spider. McKenzie R J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs; 2005 Oct; 12(5):550-5. PubMed ID: 16164505 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Through the looking glass: publishing in a journal in another language or another country. Baggs JG Res Nurs Health; 2010 Apr; 33(2):85-6. PubMed ID: 20054873 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. [Advice for authors. Four principal reasons for manuscript rejection]. Clarke SP Perspect Infirm; 2006; 3(3):35-9. PubMed ID: 16480058 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. In praise of peer reviewers and the peer review process. Peternelj-Taylor C J Forensic Nurs; 2010; 6(4):159-61. PubMed ID: 21114756 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The impact of the impact factor on publication in critical care nursing. Egerod I Nurs Crit Care; 2008; 13(4):184. PubMed ID: 18577169 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. SQUIRE Guidelines for reporting improvement studies in healthcare: implications for nursing publications. Oermann MH J Nurs Care Qual; 2009; 24(2):91-5. PubMed ID: 19287244 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. If it's too good to be true, it probably is. Kennedy MS Am J Nurs; 2009 Dec; 109(12):7. PubMed ID: 19935148 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. The 'truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth...'. Broome ME Nurs Outlook; 2008; 56(6):281-2. PubMed ID: 19041445 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. When R & R is not rest & recovery but revise & resubmit. Bearinger LH; Taliaferro L; Given B Res Nurs Health; 2010 Oct; 33(5):381-5. PubMed ID: 20827742 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Focus on peer review. Dougherty MC Nurs Res; 2010; 59(6):371. PubMed ID: 21048481 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Upping the ante: how does the need for evidence-based practice influence Neonatal Network articles? Askin DF Neonatal Netw; 2007; 26(3):139-40. PubMed ID: 17521059 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]