These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21573229)

  • 21. Institutional environments and breakthroughs in science. Comparison of France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States.
    Heinze T; von der Heyden M; Pithan D
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(9):e0239805. PubMed ID: 32997679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [A message for young child neurologists: a lesson from the Nobel Prize centennial].
    Kamoshita S
    No To Hattatsu; 2004 Mar; 36(2):106-13. PubMed ID: 15031983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Hamming's "open doors" and group creativity as keys to scientific excellence: the example of Cambridge.
    Erren TC
    Med Hypotheses; 2008; 70(3):473-7. PubMed ID: 17804173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Sources of funding for Nobel Prize-winning work: public or private?
    Tatsioni A; Vavva E; Ioannidis JP
    FASEB J; 2010 May; 24(5):1335-9. PubMed ID: 20056712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A meaningful legacy: urologists as Nobel Prize laureates.
    Mouraviev V; Gleave ME
    Can J Urol; 2003 Feb; 10(1):1737-42. PubMed ID: 12625851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Reputation and impact in academic careers.
    Petersen AM; Fortunato S; Pan RK; Kaski K; Penner O; Rungi A; Riccaboni M; Stanley HE; Pammolli F
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2014 Oct; 111(43):15316-21. PubMed ID: 25288774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Scientific X-ray: Scanning and quantifying the idea evolution of scientific publications.
    Li Q; Wang X; Fu L; Wang J; Yao L; Gan X; Zhou C
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(9):e0275192. PubMed ID: 36170296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Citation indexing and evaluation of scientific papers.
    Margolis J
    Science; 1967 Mar; 155(3767):1213-9. PubMed ID: 5335153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Long-distance interdisciplinarity leads to higher scientific impact.
    Larivière V; Haustein S; Börner K
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0122565. PubMed ID: 25822658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. A network-based normalized impact measure reveals successful periods of scientific discovery across discipline.
    Ke Q; Gates AJ; Barabási AL
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2023 Nov; 120(48):e2309378120. PubMed ID: 37983494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [The impact factor as an assessment criterion of scientific achievements--the right to equal chances].
    Lehrl S
    Strahlenther Onkol; 1999 Apr; 175(4):141-53. PubMed ID: 10230456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Impact factor and other indices to assess science, scientists and scientific journals.
    Satyanarayana K
    Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 2010; 54(3):197-212. PubMed ID: 21409860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Nobel laureates in the history of the vitamins.
    Souganidis E
    Ann Nutr Metab; 2012; 61(3):265-9. PubMed ID: 23183300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Modeling scientific-citation patterns and other triangle-rich acyclic networks.
    Wu ZX; Holme P
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2009 Sep; 80(3 Pt 2):037101. PubMed ID: 19905247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. From Excessive Journal Self-Cites to Citation Stacking: Analysis of Journal Self-Citation Kinetics in Search for Journals, Which Boost Their Scientometric Indicators.
    Heneberg P
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(4):e0153730. PubMed ID: 27088862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. From North American hegemony to global competition for scientific leadership? Insights from the Nobel population.
    Heinze T; Jappe A; Pithan D
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(4):e0213916. PubMed ID: 30943240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Counting highly cited papers for university research assessment: conceptual and technical issues.
    Rodríguez-Navarro A
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(10):e47210. PubMed ID: 23071759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Methods for measuring the citations and productivity of scientists across time and discipline.
    Petersen AM; Wang F; Stanley HE
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2010 Mar; 81(3 Pt 2):036114. PubMed ID: 20365822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The measurement of the effect on citation inequality of differences in citation practices across scientific fields.
    Crespo JA; Li Y; Ruiz-Castillo J
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(3):e58727. PubMed ID: 23516542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A Large-Scale Analysis of Impact Factor Biased Journal Self-Citations.
    Chorus C; Waltman L
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0161021. PubMed ID: 27560807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.