152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21574052)
1. Mid-term results of acetabular reconstruction using a Kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement device.
Hori J; Yasunaga Y; Yamasaki T; Yoshida T; Oshima S; Yamasaki K; Matsuo T; Ochi M
Int Orthop; 2012 Jan; 36(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 21574052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using the Kerboull Acetabular Reinforcement Device and Structural Allograft for Severe Defects of the Acetabulum.
Makita H; Kerboull M; Inaba Y; Tezuka T; Saito T; Kerboull L
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Nov; 32(11):3502-3509. PubMed ID: 28711340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Revision total hip arthroplasty using a Kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement device with bone allograft: minimum 4.5-year follow-up results and mechanical analysis.
Akiyama H; Yamamoto K; Tsukanaka M; Kawanabe K; Otsuka H; So K; Goto K; Nakamura T
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Sep; 93(9):1194-200. PubMed ID: 21911530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Revision total hip arthroplasty using the Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device for Paprosky type III defects involving the inferior margin of the acetabulum: a minimum five-year follow-up study.
Gibon E; Barut N; Courpied JP; Hamadouche M
Bone Joint J; 2018 Jun; 100-B(6):725-732. PubMed ID: 29855248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bone Remodeling in Acetabular Reconstruction Using a Kerboull-Type Reinforcement Device and Structural Bone-Grafting in Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Oe K; Iida H; Tsuda K; Nakamura T; Okamoto N; Ueda Y
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Mar; 32(3):908-914. PubMed ID: 27687810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. One-third of Hips After Periacetabular Osteotomy Survive 30 Years With Good Clinical Results, No Progression of Arthritis, or Conversion to THA.
Lerch TD; Steppacher SD; Liechti EF; Tannast M; Siebenrock KA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Apr; 475(4):1154-1168. PubMed ID: 27905061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reconstruction of the Shallow Acetabulum With a Combination of Autologous Bulk and Impaction Bone Grafting Fixed by Cement.
Maruyama M; Wakabayashi S; Ota H; Tensho K
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Feb; 475(2):387-395. PubMed ID: 27837399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ganz reinforcement ring for reconstruction of acetabular defects in revision total hip arthroplasty.
Gerber A; Pisan M; Zurakowski D; Isler B
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2003 Dec; 85(12):2358-64. PubMed ID: 14668505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Acetabular revision with bone grafting and cementation for aseptic loosening after primary Charnley low-friction hip arthroplasty with structural bulk autografts.
Mohammed R; Drampalos E; Siney P; Purbach B; Kay P
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2016 Dec; 24(3):328-331. PubMed ID: 28031500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Long-Term Outcome of Acetabular Reconstruction Using a Kerboull-Type Acetabular Reinforcement Device with Hydroxyapetite Granule and Structural Autograft for AAOS type II and III Acetabular Defects.
Kim Y; Tanaka C; Kanoe H
J Arthroplasty; 2015 Oct; 30(10):1810-4. PubMed ID: 25981327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Acetabular bone defects in THA revision: Reconstruction using morsellised virus-inactivated bone allograft and reinforcement ring. Seven-year outcomes in 95 patients.
Villatte G; Erivan R; Salles G; Pereira B; Galvin M; Descamps S; Boisgard S
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2017 Jun; 103(4):543-548. PubMed ID: 28366746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Acetabular reconstruction using a Kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement device and hydroxyapatite granules: a 3- to 8-year follow-up study.
Tanaka C; Shikata J; Ikenaga M; Takahashi M
J Arthroplasty; 2003 Sep; 18(6):719-25. PubMed ID: 14513444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Cementless Cup Supporter and Iliac Autograft: A Minimum of 15-Year Follow-Up.
Yoshino K; Tsukeoka T; Tsuneizumi Y; Lee TH; Nakamura J; Suzuki M; Ohtori S
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Nov; 32(11):3495-3501. PubMed ID: 28697865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Kerboull acetabular reinforcement device in major acetabular reconstructions.
Kerboull M; Hamadouche M; Kerboull L
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2000 Sep; (378):155-68. PubMed ID: 10986990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Labral Reattachment in Femoroacetabular Impingement Surgery Results in Increased 10-year Survivorship Compared With Resection.
Anwander H; Siebenrock KA; Tannast M; Steppacher SD
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Apr; 475(4):1178-1188. PubMed ID: 27744594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Acetabular revision using a Kerboull-type reinforcement device through direct anterior approach.
Tamaki T; Ninomiya T; Jonishi K; Miura Y; Oinuma K; Shiratsuchi H
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2018; 26(2):2309499018782553. PubMed ID: 29945476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Total hip arthroplasty with acetabular reconstruction using a bulk autograft for patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip results in high loosening rates at mid-term follow-up.
Zahar A; Papik K; Lakatos J; Cross MB
Int Orthop; 2014 May; 38(5):947-51. PubMed ID: 24477474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Promising Mid-term Results With a Cup-cage Construct for Large Acetabular Defects and Pelvic Discontinuity.
Amenabar T; Rahman WA; Hetaimish BM; Kuzyk PR; Safir OA; Gross AE
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Feb; 474(2):408-14. PubMed ID: 25712864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of porous tantalum components in Paprosky two and three acetabular revision. A minimum five-year follow-up of fifty one hips.
Flecher X; Appy B; Parratte S; Ollivier M; Argenson JN
Int Orthop; 2017 May; 41(5):911-916. PubMed ID: 27766385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Can cemented dual-mobility cups be used without a reinforcement device in cases of mild acetabular bone stock alteration in total hip arthroplasty?
Haen TX; Lonjon G; Vandenbussche E
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2015 Dec; 101(8):923-7. PubMed ID: 26542070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
