269 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21574483)
1. [Ultrasound macrosomic fetal weight estimation formula using maternal weight measurements].
Murlewska J; Pietryga M; Wender-Ozegowska E
Ginekol Pol; 2011 Feb; 82(2):114-8. PubMed ID: 21574483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Macrosomia: a new formula for optimized fetal weight estimation.
Hart NC; Hilbert A; Meurer B; Schrauder M; Schmid M; Siemer J; Voigt M; Schild RL
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Jan; 35(1):42-7. PubMed ID: 20034003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ultrasonographic Fetal Weight Estimation: Should Macrosomia-Specific Formulas Be Utilized?
Porter B; Neely C; Szychowski J; Owen J
Am J Perinatol; 2015 Aug; 32(10):968-72. PubMed ID: 25730134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Weight estimation for low birth weight fetuses and macrosomic fetuses in Chinese population.
Chen P; Yu J; Li X; Wang Y; Chang C
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2011 Sep; 284(3):599-606. PubMed ID: 21046133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A new formula for optimized weight estimation in extreme fetal macrosomia (≥ 4500 g).
Faschingbauer F; Beckmann MW; Goecke TW; Yazdi B; Siemer J; Schmid M; Mayr A; Schild RL
Ultraschall Med; 2012 Oct; 33(5):480-8. PubMed ID: 22723038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Incorporating sonographic cheek-to-cheek diameter, biparietal diameter and abdominal circumference improves weight estimation in the macrosomic fetus.
Abramowicz JS; Robischon K; Cox C
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jun; 9(6):409-13. PubMed ID: 9239827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Different formulas, different thresholds and different performance-the prediction of macrosomia by ultrasound.
Aviram A; Yogev Y; Ashwal E; Hiersch L; Danon D; Hadar E; Gabbay-Benziv R
J Perinatol; 2017 Dec; 37(12):1285-1291. PubMed ID: 28906497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Incorporation of femur length leads to underestimation of fetal weight in asymmetric preterm growth restriction.
Proctor LK; Rushworth V; Shah PS; Keunen J; Windrim R; Ryan G; Kingdom J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Apr; 35(4):442-8. PubMed ID: 20196066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fetal weight estimation in extreme macrosomia (≥ 4,500 g): comparison of 10 formulas.
Faschingbauer F; Voigt F; Goecke TW; Siemer J; Beckmann MW; Yazdi B; Schild RL
Ultraschall Med; 2012 Dec; 33(7):E62-E67. PubMed ID: 22179801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Performance of 36 different weight estimation formulae in fetuses with macrosomia.
Hoopmann M; Abele H; Wagner N; Wallwiener D; Kagan KO
Fetal Diagn Ther; 2010; 27(4):204-13. PubMed ID: 20523027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Ultrasonographic estimation of fetal weight: development of new model and assessment of performance of previous models.
Hammami A; Mazer Zumaeta A; Syngelaki A; Akolekar R; Nicolaides KH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jul; 52(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 29611251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intrapartum sonographic weight estimation.
Faschingbauer F; Dammer U; Raabe E; Schneider M; Faschingbauer C; Schmid M; Schild RL; Beckmann MW; Kehl S; Mayr A
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2015 Oct; 292(4):805-11. PubMed ID: 25870017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Optimized Sonographic Weight Estimation of Fetuses over 3500 g Using Biometry-Guided Formula Selection.
Balsyte D; Schäffer L; Zimmermann R; Kurmanavicius J; Burkhardt T
Ultraschall Med; 2017 Jan; 38(1):60-64. PubMed ID: 26422668
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The Accuracy of Sonographic Assessment for Fetal Weight: Technicians versus Ultrasound-Certified Physicians.
Rottenstreich A; Yanai N; Yagel S; Porat S
Isr Med Assoc J; 2019 Dec; 21(12):801-805. PubMed ID: 31814343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Disadvantages of a weight estimation formula for macrosomic fetuses: the Hart formula from a clinical perspective.
Weiss C; Oppelt P; Mayer RB
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 Dec; 298(6):1101-1106. PubMed ID: 30284620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Correctly identifying the macrosomic fetus: improving ultrasonography-based prediction.
Sokol RJ; Chik L; Dombrowski MP; Zador IE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Jun; 182(6):1489-95. PubMed ID: 10871470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The birth weight of macrosomia influence the accuracy of ultrasound estimation of fetal weight at term.
Song J; Liu J; Liu L; Jiang Y; Zheng H; Ke H; Yang L; Zhang Z
J Clin Ultrasound; 2022 Sep; 50(7):967-973. PubMed ID: 35716368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Screening efficacy of the subcutaneous tissue width/femur length ratio for fetal macrosomia in the non-diabetic pregnancy.
Rotmensch S; Celentano C; Liberati M; Malinger G; Sadan O; Bellati U; Glezerman M
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 May; 13(5):340-4. PubMed ID: 10380299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. New sonographic method for fetuses with a large abdominal circumference improves fetal weight estimation.
Kehl S; Körber C; Hart N; Goecke TW; Schild RL; Siemer J
Ultraschall Med; 2012 Jun; 33(3):265-9. PubMed ID: 21080309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A prospective pilot study in assessing the accuracy of ultrasound estimated fetal weight prior to delivery.
Sekar R; Khatun M; Barrett HL; Duncombe G
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2016 Feb; 56(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 26299881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
