These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21574746)
1. Retrieval experience as a modifier of future encoding: another test effect. Bjork EL; Storm BC J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1113-24. PubMed ID: 21574746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Distinctive items are salient during encoding: delayed judgements of learning predict the isolation effect. Geraci L; Manzano I Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jan; 63(1):50-64. PubMed ID: 19370485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Improving encoding strategies as a function of test knowledge and experience. Storm BC; Hickman ML; Bjork EL Mem Cognit; 2016 May; 44(4):660-70. PubMed ID: 26822535 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fact learning: how information accuracy, delay, and repeated testing change retention and retrieval experience. Barber SJ; Rajaram S; Marsh EJ Memory; 2008 Nov; 16(8):934-46. PubMed ID: 18949663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. When does testing enhance retention? A distribution-based interpretation of retrieval as a memory modifier. Halamish V; Bjork RA J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Jul; 37(4):801-12. PubMed ID: 21480751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Metacognitive control and strategy selection: deciding to practice retrieval during learning. Karpicke JD J Exp Psychol Gen; 2009 Nov; 138(4):469-86. PubMed ID: 19883131 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Why is test-restudy practice beneficial for memory? An evaluation of the mediator shift hypothesis. Pyc MA; Rawson KA J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 May; 38(3):737-46. PubMed ID: 22060276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Testing and feedback effects on front-end control over later retrieval. Thomas RC; McDaniel MA J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Mar; 39(2):437-50. PubMed ID: 22732026 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Metacognitive strategies in student learning: do students practise retrieval when they study on their own? Karpicke JD; Butler AC; Roediger HL Memory; 2009 May; 17(4):471-9. PubMed ID: 19358016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Semantic information activated during retrieval contributes to later retention: Support for the mediator effectiveness hypothesis of the testing effect. Carpenter SK J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Nov; 37(6):1547-52. PubMed ID: 21707217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The costs and benefits of testing text materials. Little JL; Storm BC; Bjork EL Memory; 2011 May; 19(4):346-59. PubMed ID: 21678153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Processing instructions and the generation effect: a test of the multifactor transfer-appropriate processing theory. de Winstanley PA; Bjork EL Memory; 1997 May; 5(3):401-21. PubMed ID: 9231150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Improving text recall with multiple summaries. van der Meij H; van der Meij J Br J Educ Psychol; 2012 Jun; 82(Pt 2):257-69. PubMed ID: 22583090 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Improving college students' evaluation of text learning using idea-unit standards. Dunlosky J; Hartwig MK; Rawson KA; Lipko AR Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Mar; 64(3):467-84. PubMed ID: 20700858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]