147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21574830)
21. Periodontal assessment by right- and left-handed examiners: is there a difference?
Khan SM; Blanchard SB; Dowsett SA; Eckert GJ; Kowolik MJ
J Periodontol; 2006 Jul; 77(7):1099-103. PubMed ID: 16805670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Intra - and inter-examiner reproducibility in constant force probing.
Wang SF; Leknes KN; Zimmerman GJ; Sigurdsson TJ; Wikesjö UM; Selvig KA
J Clin Periodontol; 1995 Dec; 22(12):918-22. PubMed ID: 8613559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparative reproducibility of proximal probing depth using electronic pressure-controlled and hand probing.
Mullally BH; Linden GJ
J Clin Periodontol; 1994 Apr; 21(4):284-8. PubMed ID: 8195446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. A periodontal probe with automated cemento--enamel junction detection-design and clinical trials.
Jeffcoat MK; Jeffcoat RL; Captain K
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 1991 Apr; 38(4):330-3. PubMed ID: 1855793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Reproducibility and validity of the assessment of clinical furcation parameters as related to different probes.
Eickholz P; Kim TS
J Periodontol; 1998 Mar; 69(3):328-36. PubMed ID: 9579619
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Clinical evaluation of a constant force electronic probe.
Quirynen M; Callens A; van Steenberghe D; Nys M
J Periodontol; 1993 Jan; 64(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 8426288
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Pain experienced by patients during periodontal recall examination using thinner versus thicker probes.
Hassan MA; Bogle G; Quishenbery M; Stephens D; Riggs M; Egelberg J
J Periodontol; 2005 Jun; 76(6):980-4. PubMed ID: 15948694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Important differences in clinical data from third, second, and first generation periodontal probes.
Breen HJ; Rogers PA; Lawless HC; Austin JS; Johnson NW
J Periodontol; 1997 Apr; 68(4):335-45. PubMed ID: 9150038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A thin or thick probe handle: does it make a difference?
van Weringh M; Barendregt DS; Rosema NA; Timmerman MF; van der Weijden GA
Int J Dent Hyg; 2006 Aug; 4(3):140-4. PubMed ID: 16958742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Intra- and inter-examiner reproducibility of manual probing depth.
Andrade R; Espinoza M; Gómez EM; Espinoza JR; Cruz E
Braz Oral Res; 2012; 26(1):57-63. PubMed ID: 22344339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Accuracy of probing attachment levels using a CEJ probe versus traditional probes.
Karpinia K; Magnusson I; Gibbs C; Yang MC
J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Mar; 31(3):173-6. PubMed ID: 15016020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Clinical evaluation of tine shape of 3 periodontal probes using 2 probing forces.
Barendregt DS; Van der Velden U; Reiker J; Loos BG
J Clin Periodontol; 1996 Apr; 23(4):397-402. PubMed ID: 8739173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Reproducibility of peri-implant probing using a force-controlled probe.
Eickholz P; Grotkamp FL; Steveling H; Mühling J; Staehle HJ
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2001 Apr; 12(2):153-8. PubMed ID: 11251665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Bone probing measurement as a reliable evaluation of the bone level in periodontal defects.
Kim HY; Yi SW; Choi SH; Kim CK
J Periodontol; 2000 May; 71(5):729-35. PubMed ID: 10872953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Histological location of a standardized periodontal probe in man.
Aguero A; Garnick JJ; Keagle J; Steflik DE; Thompson WO
J Periodontol; 1995 Mar; 66(3):184-90. PubMed ID: 7776162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The influence of gingival health status on periodontal probing measurements. A clinical study in humans.
Molina GO; Souza SL; Grisi MF; Novaes AB; Taba M
J Int Acad Periodontol; 2004 Apr; 6(2):56-62. PubMed ID: 15125016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Evaluation of a new periodontal probe tip design. A clinical and in vitro study.
Vartoukian SR; Palmer RM; Wilson RF
J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Oct; 31(10):918-25. PubMed ID: 15367198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Clinical attachment level measurements with and without the use of a stent by a computerized electronic probe.
Machion L; Andia DC; Nociti Júnior FH; Casati MZ; Sallum AW; Sallum EA
J Int Acad Periodontol; 2007 Apr; 9(2):58-62. PubMed ID: 17506385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Periodontal probing: probe tip diameter.
Garnick JJ; Silverstein L
J Periodontol; 2000 Jan; 71(1):96-103. PubMed ID: 10695944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A clinical study of an electronic constant force periodontal probe.
Tupta-Veselicky L; Famili P; Ceravolo FJ; Zullo T
J Periodontol; 1994 Jun; 65(6):616-22. PubMed ID: 8083795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
