546 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21575466)
1. [Feasibility of unilateral or bilateral nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer and evaluation of the post-surgery recovery of the bladder and rectal function].
Zhu T; Yu AJ; Shou HF; Chen X; Zhu JQ; Yang ZY; Zhang P; Gao YL
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2011 Jan; 33(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 21575466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Laparoscopic anatomical nerve sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a clinical analysis of 37 cases].
Chen Y; Li Y; Xu HC; Li JN; Li YY; Liang ZQ
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 May; 44(5):359-63. PubMed ID: 19573312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy and radical hysterectomy: a retrospective study].
Ju XZ; Li ZT; Yang HJ; Wu XH
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2009 Aug; 44(8):605-9. PubMed ID: 20003790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [A prospective study on nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer].
Li B; Zhang R; Wu LY; Zhang GY; Li X; Yu GZ
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2008 Aug; 43(8):606-10. PubMed ID: 19087497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Class III nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy versus standard class III radical hysterectomy: an observational study.
Ditto A; Martinelli F; Mattana F; Reato C; Solima E; Carcangiu M; Haeusler E; Mariani L; Raspagliesi F
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Nov; 18(12):3469-78. PubMed ID: 21556949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Efficacy and oncologic safety of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a randomized controlled trial.
Roh JW; Lee DO; Suh DH; Lim MC; Seo SS; Chung J; Lee S; Park SY
J Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Apr; 26(2):90-9. PubMed ID: 25872890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effectiveness and Long-term Outcomes of Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer.
Yamamoto A; Kamoi S; Ikeda M; Yamada T; Yoneyama K; Takeshita T
J Nippon Med Sch; 2021 Nov; 88(5):386-397. PubMed ID: 32741908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Classical and nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: an evaluation of the nerve trauma in cardinal ligament.
Chen C; Li W; Li F; Liu P; Zhou J; Lu L; Su G; Li X; Guo Y; Huang L
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Apr; 125(1):245-51. PubMed ID: 22209773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A prospective study of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for uterine cervical carcinoma in Taiwan.
Tseng CJ; Shen HP; Lin YH; Lee CY; Wei-Cheng Chiu W
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2012 Mar; 51(1):55-9. PubMed ID: 22482969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Preliminary study of nerve sparing radical hysterectomy in patients with cervical cancer].
Sun L; Wu LY; Zhang WH; Li XG; Song Y; Zhang X
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 2009 Aug; 31(8):607-11. PubMed ID: 20021949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pelvic dysfunctions and quality of life after nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: a multicenter comparative study.
Ceccaroni M; Roviglione G; Spagnolo E; Casadio P; Clarizia R; Peiretti M; Bruni F; Peters I; Aletti G
Anticancer Res; 2012 Feb; 32(2):581-8. PubMed ID: 22287748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Type II versus Type III nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: comparison of lower urinary tract dysfunctions.
Raspagliesi F; Ditto A; Fontanelli R; Zanaboni F; Solima E; Spatti G; Hanozet F; Vecchione F; Rossi G; Kusamura S
Gynecol Oncol; 2006 Aug; 102(2):256-62. PubMed ID: 16445968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [The impact of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy in the surgery of cervical cancer patients].
Kornovski Y; Ismail E
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2012; 51(2):17-21. PubMed ID: 23234009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Favorable factors for preserving bladder function after nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy: A protocol-based validation study.
Kim HS; Kim M; Luo Y; Lee M; Song YS;
J Surg Oncol; 2017 Sep; 116(4):492-499. PubMed ID: 28695641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Late morbidity following nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy.
Cibula D; Velechovska P; Sláma J; Fischerova D; Pinkavova I; Pavlista D; Dundr P; Hill M; Freitag P; Zikan M
Gynecol Oncol; 2010 Mar; 116(3):506-11. PubMed ID: 19906412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy on bladder function recovery and quality of life in patients with cervical carcinoma.
Wu J; Liu X; Hua K; Hu C; Chen X; Lu X
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2010 Jul; 20(5):905-9. PubMed ID: 20606542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Radical hysterectomy during the transition period from traditional to nerve-sparing technique.
Skret-Magierło J; Naróg M; Kruczek A; Kluza R; Kluz T; Magoń T; Skret A; Wicherek L
Gynecol Oncol; 2010 Mar; 116(3):502-5. PubMed ID: 20004957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy compared to standard radical hysterectomy for women with early stage cervical cancer (stage Ia2 to IIa).
Kietpeerakool C; Aue-Aungkul A; Galaal K; Ngamjarus C; Lumbiganon P
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2019 Feb; 2(2):CD012828. PubMed ID: 30746689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Application research on nerve sparing radical hysterectomy for rectal function.
Su Y; Zhang M; Zhang W; Shi H
Pak J Pharm Sci; 2017 Jan; 30(1 Suppl):329-334. PubMed ID: 28625962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Nerve plane-sparing radical hysterectomy: a simplified technique of nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy for invasive cervical cancer.
Li B; Li W; Sun YC; Zhang R; Zhang GY; Yu GZ; Wu LY
Chin Med J (Engl); 2011 Jun; 124(12):1807-12. PubMed ID: 21740837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
