138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21575793)
1. Post damage in contemporary posterior-stabilized tibial inserts: influence of implant design and clinical relevance.
; Medel FJ; Kurtz SM; Sharkey PF; Austin MS; Klein GR; Cohen AR; Patel H; Goldberg VM; Kraay MJ; Rimnac CM
J Arthroplasty; 2011 Jun; 26(4):606-14. PubMed ID: 21575793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Oxidation, Damage Mechanisms, and Reasons for Revision of Sequentially Annealed Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene in Total Knee Arthroplasty.
MacDonald DW; Higgs GB; Chen AF; Malkani AL; Mont MA; Kurtz SM
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Apr; 33(4):1235-1241. PubMed ID: 29329883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Backside damage corresponding to articular damage in retrieved tibial polyethylene inserts.
Harman MK; Banks SA; Hodge WA
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 May; 458():137-44. PubMed ID: 17242615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Fractography and oxidative analysis of gamma inert sterilized posterior-stabilized tibial insert post fractures: report of two cases.
Ansari F; Chang J; Huddleston J; Van Citters D; Ries M; Pruitt L
Knee; 2013 Dec; 20(6):609-13. PubMed ID: 24220187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Recurrent dissociation of the tibial insert after mini-subvastus posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty: a case report.
In Y; Sur YJ; Won HY; Moon YS
Knee; 2011 Dec; 18(6):461-3. PubMed ID: 20833051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Second-generation locking mechanisms and ethylene oxide sterilization reduce tibial insert backside damage in total knee arthroplasty.
Azzam MG; Roy ME; Whiteside LA
J Arthroplasty; 2011 Jun; 26(4):523-30. PubMed ID: 20541356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Implant design influences tibial post wear damage in posterior-stabilized knees.
Dolan MM; Kelly NH; Nguyen JT; Wright TM; Haas SB
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2011 Jan; 469(1):160-7. PubMed ID: 20711697
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The influence of sterilization method on articular surface damage of retrieved cruciate-retaining tibial inserts.
Greulich MT; Roy ME; Whiteside LA
J Arthroplasty; 2012 Jun; 27(6):1085-93. PubMed ID: 22177798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Surface damage on open box posterior-stabilized polyethylene tibial inserts.
Silva M; Kabbash CA; Tiberi JV; Park SH; Reilly DT; Mahoney OM; Schmalzried TP
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2003 Nov; (416):135-44. PubMed ID: 14646752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Double-concave deformity of the polyethylene tibial post in posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty.
Niki Y; Matsumoto H; Yoshimine F; Toyama Y; Suda Y; Banks SA
J Arthroplasty; 2010 Apr; 25(3):497.e7-10. PubMed ID: 19261434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Delamination wear on two retrieved polyethylene inserts after gamma sterilization in nitrogen.
Brandt JM; Medley JB; MacDonald SJ; Bourne RB
Knee; 2011 Mar; 18(2):125-9. PubMed ID: 20598549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fracture of the polyethylene tibial post in posterior stabilized (Insall Burstein II) total knee arthroplasty.
Mestha P; Shenava Y; D'Arcy JC
J Arthroplasty; 2000 Sep; 15(6):814-5. PubMed ID: 11021462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Surface Damage Is Not Reduced With Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene Tibial Inserts at Short-term.
Liu T; Esposito C; Elpers M; Wright T
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Jan; 474(1):107-16. PubMed ID: 26084848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Polished trays reduce backside wear independent of post location in posterior-stabilized TKAs.
Abdel MP; Gesell MW; Hoedt CW; Meyers KN; Wright TM; Haas SB
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2014 Aug; 472(8):2477-82. PubMed ID: 24733449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A randomized controlled trial comparing "high-flex" vs "standard" posterior cruciate substituting polyethylene tibial inserts in total knee arthroplasty.
McCalden RW; MacDonald SJ; Bourne RB; Marr JT
J Arthroplasty; 2009 Sep; 24(6 Suppl):33-8. PubMed ID: 19447001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Retrieval analysis of modular total knee replacements: factors influencing backside surface damage.
Brandt JM; MacDonald SJ; Bourne RB; Medley JB
Knee; 2012 Aug; 19(4):306-15. PubMed ID: 21784646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Aseptic loosening of the option stemmed tibial tray in the Zimmer NexGen LPS total knee arthroplasty system.
Bhalekar RM; Wells SR; Nargol ME; Shariatpanahi S; Nargol AVF; Waller S; Wildberg L; Tilley S; Langton DJ
Knee; 2024 Mar; 47():1-12. PubMed ID: 38171206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Total knee arthroplasty with 4.4 mm of tibial polyethylene an update.
Meding JB; Wing JT; Ritter MA
J Arthroplasty; 2010 Aug; 25(5):772-4. PubMed ID: 19625160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Bearing surface design changes affect contact patterns in total knee arthroplasty.
Cottrell JM; Townsend E; Lipman J; Sculco TP; Wright TM
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Nov; 464():127-31. PubMed ID: 18062045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Crosslink Density Is Reduced and Oxidation Is Increased in Retrieved Highly Crosslinked Polyethylene TKA Tibial Inserts.
Liu T; Esposito CI; Burket JC; Wright TM
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Jan; 475(1):128-136. PubMed ID: 27084716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
