These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

46 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21576164)

  • 1. Constrained simulations of flow in haemodynamic devices: towards a computational assistance of magnetic resonance imaging measurements.
    Cenova I; Kauzlarić D; Greiner A; Korvink JG
    Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci; 2011 Jun; 369(1945):2494-501. PubMed ID: 21576164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Complex flow patterns in a real-size intracranial aneurysm phantom: phase contrast MRI compared with particle image velocimetry and computational fluid dynamics.
    van Ooij P; Guédon A; Poelma C; Schneiders J; Rutten MC; Marquering HA; Majoie CB; VanBavel E; Nederveen AJ
    NMR Biomed; 2012 Jan; 25(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 21480417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Blood flow in cerebral aneurysms: comparison of phase contrast magnetic resonance and computational fluid dynamics--preliminary experience.
    Karmonik C; Klucznik R; Benndorf G
    Rofo; 2008 Mar; 180(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 18278729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Computational hemodynamics in the human aorta: a computational fluid dynamics study of three cases with patient-specific geometries and inflow rates.
    Karmonik C; Bismuth JX; Davies MG; Lumsden AB
    Technol Health Care; 2008; 16(5):343-54. PubMed ID: 19126973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Numerical simulations of flow in cerebral aneurysms: comparison of CFD results and in vivo MRI measurements.
    Rayz VL; Boussel L; Acevedo-Bolton G; Martin AJ; Young WL; Lawton MT; Higashida R; Saloner D
    J Biomech Eng; 2008 Oct; 130(5):051011. PubMed ID: 19045518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hepatic blood flow distribution and performance in conventional and novel Y-graft Fontan geometries: a case series computational fluid dynamics study.
    Yang W; Vignon-Clementel IE; Troianowski G; Reddy VM; Feinstein JA; Marsden AL
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 May; 143(5):1086-97. PubMed ID: 21962841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. High-resolution assessment of velocity fields and shear stresses distal to prosthetic heart valves using high-field magnetic resonance imaging.
    Ringgaard S; Botnar RM; Djurhuus C; Stodkilde-Jorgensen H; Hasenkam JM; Boesiger P; Pedersen EM
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Jan; 8(1):96-103. PubMed ID: 10096490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantification of blood velocity and flow rates in the uterine vessels using echo planar imaging at 0.5 Tesla.
    Issa B; Moore RJ; Bowtell RW; Baker PN; Johnson IR; Worthington BS; Gowland PA
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Apr; 31(4):921-7. PubMed ID: 20373437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Description of flow phenomena in magnetic resonance imaging.
    Deimling M; Mueller E; Lenz G; Barth K; Fritschy P; Seiderer M; Reinhardt ER
    Diagn Imaging Clin Med; 1986; 55(1-2):37-51. PubMed ID: 3635444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative velocity investigations in cerebral arteries and aneurysms: 3D phase-contrast MR angiography, laser Doppler velocimetry and computational fluid dynamics.
    Hollnagel DI; Summers PE; Poulikakos D; Kollias SS
    NMR Biomed; 2009 Oct; 22(8):795-808. PubMed ID: 19412933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Non spiral and spiral (helical) flow patterns in stenoses. In vitro observations using spin and gradient echo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computational fluid dynamic modeling.
    Stonebridge PA; Buckley C; Thompson A; Dick J; Hunter G; Chudek JA; Houston JG; Belch JJ
    Int Angiol; 2004 Sep; 23(3):276-83. PubMed ID: 15765044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mechanistic insight into the physiological relevance of helical blood flow in the human aorta: an in vivo study.
    Morbiducci U; Ponzini R; Rizzo G; Cadioli M; Esposito A; Montevecchi FM; Redaelli A
    Biomech Model Mechanobiol; 2011 Jun; 10(3):339-55. PubMed ID: 20652615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Fluid dynamic simulation of rat brain vessels, geometrically reconstructed from MR-angiography and validated using phase contrast angiography.
    Lehmpfuhl MC; Hess A; Gaudnek MA; Sibila M
    Phys Med; 2011 Jul; 27(3):169-76. PubMed ID: 20696607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measurement with microscopic MRI and simulation of flow in different aneurysm models.
    Edelhoff D; Walczak L; Frank F; Heil M; Schmitz I; Weichert F; Suter D
    Med Phys; 2015 Oct; 42(10):5661-70. PubMed ID: 26429240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Regularization of flow streamlines in multislice phase-contrast MR imaging.
    Fatouraee N; Amini AA
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2003 Jun; 22(6):699-709. PubMed ID: 12872945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development and validation of a computational fluid dynamics methodology for simulation of pulsatile left ventricular assist devices.
    Medvitz RB; Kreider JW; Manning KB; Fontaine AA; Deutsch S; Paterson EG
    ASAIO J; 2007; 53(2):122-31. PubMed ID: 17413548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Relationship between ventricular morphology and aqueductal cerebrospinal fluid flow in healthy and communicating hydrocephalus.
    Chiang WW; Takoudis CG; Lee SH; Weis-McNulty A; Glick R; Alperin N
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Apr; 44(4):192-9. PubMed ID: 19300098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Numerical simulation of in vitro pulsatile flow and its study using FRISK, a rapid phase contrast technique.
    Li L; Doyle M; Rayarao G; Kortright E; Ito Y; Anayiotos A
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Sep; 26(3):805-15. PubMed ID: 17729352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Acceleration of cardiovascular MRI using parallel imaging: basic principles, practical considerations, clinical applications and future directions].
    Niendorf T; Sodickson D
    Rofo; 2006 Jan; 178(1):15-30. PubMed ID: 16392054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hemodynamic comparison of differing anastomotic geometries using magnetic resonance velocimetry.
    Neville RF; Elkins CJ; Alley MT; Wicker RB
    J Surg Res; 2011 Aug; 169(2):311-8. PubMed ID: 20444476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.