These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21580797)
1. Direct-access retrieval during sentence comprehension: Evidence from Sluicing. Martin AE; McElree B J Mem Lang; 2011 May; 64(4):327-343. PubMed ID: 21580797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Memory operations that support language comprehension: evidence from verb-phrase ellipsis. Martin AE; McElree B J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1231-9. PubMed ID: 19686017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Event-related brain potentials index cue-based retrieval interference during sentence comprehension. Martin AE; Nieuwland MS; Carreiras M Neuroimage; 2012 Jan; 59(2):1859-69. PubMed ID: 21925613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comprehension of Linguistic Dependencies: Speed-Accuracy Tradeoff Evidence for Direct-Access Retrieval From Memory. Foraker S; McElree B Lang Linguist Compass; 2011 Nov; 5(11):764-783. PubMed ID: 22448181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cue integration during sentence comprehension: Electrophysiological evidence from ellipsis. Martin AE PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0206616. PubMed ID: 30496297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Agreement attraction during comprehension of grammatical sentences: ERP evidence from ellipsis. Martin AE; Nieuwland MS; Carreiras M Brain Lang; 2014 Aug; 135():42-51. PubMed ID: 24911918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The structure-sensitivity of memory access: evidence from Mandarin Chinese. Dillon B; Chow WY; Wagers M; Guo T; Liu F; Phillips C Front Psychol; 2014; 5():1025. PubMed ID: 25309486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Working Memory in the Processing of Long-Distance Dependencies: Interference and Filler Maintenance. Ness T; Meltzer-Asscher A J Psycholinguist Res; 2017 Dec; 46(6):1353-1365. PubMed ID: 28528512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Proximity and Same Case Marking Do Not Increase Attraction Effect in Comprehension: Evidence From Eye-Tracking Experiments in Korean. Kwon N; Sturt P Front Psychol; 2019; 10():1320. PubMed ID: 31244723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Elaboration over a Discourse Facilitates Retrieval in Sentence Processing. Troyer M; Hofmeister P; Kutas M Front Psychol; 2016; 7():374. PubMed ID: 27014172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Encoding interference effects support self-organized sentence processing. Smith G; Franck J; Tabor W Cogn Psychol; 2021 Feb; 124():101356. PubMed ID: 33285355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Filling the Silence: Reactivation, not Reconstruction. Paape DL Front Psychol; 2016; 7():27. PubMed ID: 26858674 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Retrieval cues and syntactic ambiguity resolution: Speed-accuracy tradeoff evidence. Martin AE; McElree B Lang Cogn Neurosci; 2018; 33(6):769-783. PubMed ID: 31131287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]