These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21580800)

  • 1. Rupture threshold characterization of polymer-shelled ultrasound contrast agents subjected to static overpressure.
    Chitnis PV; Lee P; Mamou J; Allen JS; Böhmer M; Ketterling JA
    J Appl Phys; 2011 Apr; 109(8):84906-8490610. PubMed ID: 21580800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of shell properties on high-frequency ultrasound imaging and drug delivery using polymer-shelled microbubbles.
    Chitnis PV; Koppolu S; Mamou J; Chlon C; Ketterling JA
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2013 Jan; 60(1):53-64. PubMed ID: 23287913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Correlation of rupture dynamics to the nonlinear backscatter response from polymer-shelled ultrasound contrast agents.
    Koppolu S; Chitnis PV; Mamou J; Allen JS; Ketterling JA
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2015 Mar; 62(3):494-501. PubMed ID: 25935932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Characterisation of polymer shelled microbubbles in wall less flow phantom using high frequency ultrasound and video microscopy.
    Chitnis PV; Lee P; Dayton PA; Mamou J; Ketterling JA
    Bubble Sci Eng Technol; 2011 Nov; 3(2):73-78. PubMed ID: 23795208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sonochemiluminescence observation of lipid- and polymer-shelled ultrasound contrast agents in 1.2 MHz focused ultrasound field.
    Qiao Y; Cao H; Zhang S; Yin H; Wan M
    Ultrason Sonochem; 2013 Jan; 20(1):162-70. PubMed ID: 22819330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. In vitro contrast-enhanced ultrasound measurements of capillary microcirculation: comparison between polymer- and phospholipid-shelled microbubbles.
    Grishenkov D; Kari L; Brodin LK; Brismar TB; Paradossi G
    Ultrasonics; 2011 Jan; 51(1):40-8. PubMed ID: 20542310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relationship between cavitation and loss of echogenicity from ultrasound contrast agents.
    Radhakrishnan K; Bader KB; Haworth KJ; Kopechek JA; Raymond JL; Huang SL; McPherson DD; Holland CK
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Sep; 58(18):6541-63. PubMed ID: 24002637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Characterization of ultrasound-induced fracture of polymer-shelled ultrasonic contrast agents by correlation analysis.
    Pecorari C; Grishenkov D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2425-30. PubMed ID: 17902876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Targeted binding of PEG-lipid modified polymer ultrasound contrast agents with tiered surface architecture.
    Duncanson WJ; Oum K; Eisenbrey JR; Cleveland RO; Wheatley MA; Wong JY
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2010 Jun; 106(3):501-6. PubMed ID: 20091738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Transfection effect of microbubbles on cells in superposed ultrasound waves and behavior of cavitation bubble.
    Kodama T; Tomita Y; Koshiyama K; Blomley MJ
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2006 Jun; 32(6):905-14. PubMed ID: 16785012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Synthesis of laboratory Ultrasound Contrast Agents.
    Park J; Park D; Shin U; Moon S; Kim C; Kim HS; Park H; Choi K; Jung B; Oh J; Seo J
    Molecules; 2013 Oct; 18(10):13078-95. PubMed ID: 24152677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of the fragmentation thresholds and inertial cavitation doses of different ultrasound contrast agents.
    Chen WS; Matula TJ; Brayman AA; Crum LA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jan; 113(1):643-51. PubMed ID: 12558300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Investigation on the inertial cavitation threshold and shell properties of commercialized ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles.
    Guo X; Li Q; Zhang Z; Zhang D; Tu J
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1622-31. PubMed ID: 23927202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Theoretical estimation of attenuation coefficient of resonant ultrasound contrast agents.
    Xia L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 May; 147(5):3061. PubMed ID: 32486799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimating concentration of ultrasound contrast agents with backscatter coefficients: experimental and theoretical aspects.
    Leithem SM; Lavarello RJ; O'Brien WD; Oelze ML
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Mar; 131(3):2295-305. PubMed ID: 22423724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Broadband attenuation measurements of phospholipid-shelled ultrasound contrast agents.
    Raymond JL; Haworth KJ; Bader KB; Radhakrishnan K; Griffin JK; Huang SL; McPherson DD; Holland CK
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2014 Feb; 40(2):410-21. PubMed ID: 24262056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Surface modes and acoustic scattering of microspheres and ultrasound contrast agents.
    Falou O; Jafari Sojahrood A; Kumaradas JC; Kolios MC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1820-9. PubMed ID: 22978909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Gauging the likelihood of stable cavitation from ultrasound contrast agents.
    Bader KB; Holland CK
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Jan; 58(1):127-44. PubMed ID: 23221109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Impulse response method for characterization of echogenic liposomes.
    Raymond JL; Luan Y; van Rooij T; Kooiman K; Huang SL; McPherson DD; Versluis M; de Jong N; Holland CK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Apr; 137(4):1693-703. PubMed ID: 25920822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Imaging with ultrasound contrast agents: current status and future.
    Chong WK; Papadopoulou V; Dayton PA
    Abdom Radiol (NY); 2018 Apr; 43(4):762-772. PubMed ID: 29508011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.