BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21584853)

  • 1. Dissociative effects of orthographic distinctiveness in pure and mixed lists: an item-order account.
    McDaniel MA; Cahill M; Bugg JM; Meadow NG
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Oct; 39(7):1162-73. PubMed ID: 21584853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The curious case of orthographic distinctiveness: Disruption of categorical processing.
    McDaniel MA; Cahill MJ; Bugg JM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Jan; 42(1):104-13. PubMed ID: 26237617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Instability in memory phenomena: a common puzzle and a unifying explanation.
    McDaniel MA; Bugg JM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2008 Apr; 15(2):237-55. PubMed ID: 18488637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Testing a Strategy-Disruption Account of the List-Strength Effect.
    Ensor TM; Bancroft TD; Guitard D; Bireta TJ; Hockley WE; Surprenant AM
    Exp Psychol; 2020 Jul; 67(4):255-275. PubMed ID: 33111659
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Order information and retrieval distinctiveness: recall of common versus bizarre material.
    McDaniel MA; DeLosh EL; Merritt PS
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 Jul; 26(4):1045-56. PubMed ID: 10946377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Distinctive encoding of a subset of DRM lists yields not only benefits, but also costs and spillovers.
    Huff MJ; Bodner GE; Gretz MR
    Psychol Res; 2021 Feb; 85(1):280-290. PubMed ID: 31463566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Order information is used to guide recall of long lists: Further evidence for the item-order account.
    Forrin ND; MacLeod CM
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2016 Jun; 70(2):125-38. PubMed ID: 27244354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of word frequency on individual-item and serial order retention: tests of the order-encoding view.
    Merritt PS; DeLosh EL; McDaniel MA
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Dec; 34(8):1615-27. PubMed ID: 17489288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Conditional recall and the frequency effect in the serial recall task: an examination of item-to-item associativity.
    Miller LM; Roodenrys S
    Mem Cognit; 2012 Nov; 40(8):1246-56. PubMed ID: 22696222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Testing the item-order account of design effects using the production effect.
    Jonker TR; Levene M; Macleod CM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Mar; 40(2):441-8. PubMed ID: 24219087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Item-specific and relational processing both improve recall accuracy in the DRM paradigm.
    Huff MJ; Bodner GE
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Jun; 72(6):1493-1506. PubMed ID: 30188245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The production effect in long-list recall: In no particular order?
    Lambert AM; Bodner GE; Taikh A
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2016 Jun; 70(2):165-76. PubMed ID: 27244358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Testing effects in mixed- versus pure-list designs.
    Rowland CA; Littrell-Baez MK; Sensenig AE; DeLosh EL
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Aug; 42(6):912-21. PubMed ID: 24619791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Orthographic distinctiveness and semantic elaboration provide separate contributions to memory.
    Kirchhoff BA; Schapiro ML; Buckner RL
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Dec; 17(12):1841-54. PubMed ID: 16356323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Disentangling encoding versus retrieval explanations of the bizarreness effect: implications for distinctiveness.
    McDaniel MA; Dornburg CC; Guynn MJ
    Mem Cognit; 2005 Mar; 33(2):270-9. PubMed ID: 16028582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. In support of selective rehearsal: Double-item presentation in item-method directed forgetting.
    Tan P; Ensor TM; Hockley WE; Harrison GW; Wilson DE
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Jun; 27(3):529-535. PubMed ID: 32219699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Asymmetrical interference between item and order information in short-term memory.
    Guitard D; Saint-Aubin J; Cowan N
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Feb; 47(2):243-263. PubMed ID: 32833467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Memory variability is due to the contribution of recollection and familiarity, not to encoding variability.
    Koen JD; Yonelinas AP
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Nov; 36(6):1536-42. PubMed ID: 20854009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Item and order information in subject-performed tasks and experimenter-performed tasks.
    Engelkamp J; Dehn DM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2000 May; 26(3):671-82. PubMed ID: 10855425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Relational and item-specific information: trade-off and redundancy.
    Engelkamp J; Biegelmann U; McDaniel MA
    Memory; 1998 May; 6(3):307-33. PubMed ID: 9709445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.