These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

297 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21585466)

  • 1. The semantics of prosody: acoustic and perceptual evidence of prosodic correlates to word meaning.
    Nygaard LC; Herold DS; Namy LL
    Cogn Sci; 2009 Jan; 33(1):127-46. PubMed ID: 21585466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The developing role of prosody in novel word interpretation.
    Herold DS; Nygaard LC; Chicos KA; Namy LL
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2011 Feb; 108(2):229-41. PubMed ID: 21035127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. ERP evidence for a sex-specific Stroop effect in emotional speech.
    Schirmer A; Kotz SA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2003 Nov; 15(8):1135-48. PubMed ID: 14709232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Making predictable unpredictable with style - Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence for the critical role of prosodic expectations in the perception of prominence in speech.
    Kakouros S; Salminen N; Räsänen O
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Jan; 109():181-199. PubMed ID: 29247667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Talk this way: the effect of prosodically conveyed semantic information on memory for novel words.
    Shintel H; Anderson NL; Fenn KM
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Aug; 143(4):1437-42. PubMed ID: 24773193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Linguistic Structure and Meaning Organize Neural Oscillations into a Content-Specific Hierarchy.
    Kaufeld G; Bosker HR; Ten Oever S; Alday PM; Meyer AS; Martin AE
    J Neurosci; 2020 Dec; 40(49):9467-9475. PubMed ID: 33097640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Phonetic Encoding Contributes to the Processing of Linguistic Prosody at the Word Level: Cross-Linguistic Evidence From Event-Related Potentials.
    Yu L; Zeng J; Wang S; Zhang Y
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2021 Dec; 64(12):4791-4801. PubMed ID: 34731592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Unilateral brain damage, prosodic comprehension deficits, and the acoustic cues to prosody.
    Pell MD; Baum SR
    Brain Lang; 1997 Apr; 57(2):195-214. PubMed ID: 9126413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Say it like you mean it: mothers' use of prosody to convey word meaning.
    Herold DS; Nygaard LC; Namy LL
    Lang Speech; 2012 Sep; 55(Pt 3):423-36. PubMed ID: 23094322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Time course of Chinese monosyllabic spoken word recognition: evidence from ERP analyses.
    Zhao J; Guo J; Zhou F; Shu H
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jun; 49(7):1761-70. PubMed ID: 21382389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Affective and linguistic processing of speech prosody: DC potential studies.
    Pihan H
    Prog Brain Res; 2006; 156():269-84. PubMed ID: 17015085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Communicating emotion: linking affective prosody and word meaning.
    Nygaard LC; Queen JS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Aug; 34(4):1017-30. PubMed ID: 18665742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Acoustic and perceptual cues to contrastive stress in dysarthria.
    Patel R; Campellone P
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2009 Feb; 52(1):206-22. PubMed ID: 18695019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The impact of Parkinson's disease on vocal-prosodic communication from the perspective of listeners.
    Pell MD; Cheang HS; Leonard CL
    Brain Lang; 2006 May; 97(2):123-34. PubMed ID: 16226803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The Specificity of Sound Symbolic Correspondences in Spoken Language.
    Tzeng CY; Nygaard LC; Namy LL
    Cogn Sci; 2017 Nov; 41(8):2191-2220. PubMed ID: 28032652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An interaction between prosody and statistics in the segmentation of fluent speech.
    Shukla M; Nespor M; Mehler J
    Cogn Psychol; 2007 Feb; 54(1):1-32. PubMed ID: 16782083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prosodic boundaries in alaryngeal speech.
    van Rossum MA; Quené H; Nooteboom SG
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2008 Mar; 22(3):215-31. PubMed ID: 18307086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Talker-listener accent interactions in speech-in-noise recognition: effects of prosodic manipulation as a function of language experience.
    Pinet M; Iverson P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1357-65. PubMed ID: 20815470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of polarity in antonym and synonym conceptual knowledge: evidence from stroke aphasia and multidimensional ratings of abstract words.
    Crutch SJ; Williams P; Ridgway GR; Borgenicht L
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Sep; 50(11):2636-44. PubMed ID: 22820631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the role of attention for the processing of emotions in speech: sex differences revisited.
    Schirmer A; Kotz SA; Friederici AD
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Aug; 24(3):442-52. PubMed ID: 16099357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.