These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21585511)

  • 1. Two routes to face perception: evidence from psychophysics and computational modeling.
    Schwaninger A; Lobmaier JS; Wallraven C; Collishaw S
    Cogn Sci; 2009 Nov; 33(8):1413-40. PubMed ID: 21585511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Categorical perception effects for facial identity in robustly represented familiar and self-faces: the role of configural and featural information.
    Keyes H
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(4):760-72. PubMed ID: 22248095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Featural and configural face processing strategies: evidence from a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.
    Lobmaier JS; Klaver P; Loenneker T; Martin E; Mast FW
    Neuroreport; 2008 Feb; 19(3):287-91. PubMed ID: 18303568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spatial-frequency thresholds for configural and featural discriminations in upright and inverted faces.
    Watier NN; Collin CA; Boutet I
    Perception; 2010; 39(4):502-13. PubMed ID: 20514998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Losing face: impaired discrimination of featural and configural information in the mouth region of an inverted face.
    Tanaka JW; Kaiser MD; Hagen S; Pierce LJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 May; 76(4):1000-14. PubMed ID: 24477773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perception of novel faces: the parts have it!
    Lobmaier JS; Mast FW
    Perception; 2007; 36(11):1660-73. PubMed ID: 18265846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Face imagery is based on featural representations.
    Lobmaier JS; Mast FW
    Exp Psychol; 2008; 55(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 18271353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of geometric distortions on face-recognition performance.
    Hole GJ; George PA; Eaves K; Rasek A
    Perception; 2002; 31(10):1221-40. PubMed ID: 12430949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Tolerance for distorted faces: challenges to a configural processing account of familiar face recognition.
    Sandford A; Burton AM
    Cognition; 2014 Sep; 132(3):262-8. PubMed ID: 24853629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Configural and featural processing during face perception: a new stimulus set.
    Van Belle G; De Smet M; De Graef P; Van Gool L; Verfaillie K
    Behav Res Methods; 2009 May; 41(2):279-83. PubMed ID: 19363168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Featural, configural, and holistic face-processing strategies evoke different scan patterns.
    Bombari D; Mast FW; Lobmaier JS
    Perception; 2009; 38(10):1508-21. PubMed ID: 19950482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. When inverted faces are recognized: the role of configural information in face recognition.
    Leder H; Bruce V
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 May; 53(2):513-36. PubMed ID: 10881616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The face inversion effect--parts and wholes: individual features and their configuration.
    Civile C; McLaren RP; McLaren IP
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(4):728-46. PubMed ID: 24063659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The respective role of low and high spatial frequencies in supporting configural and featural processing of faces.
    Goffaux V; Hault B; Michel C; Vuong QC; Rossion B
    Perception; 2005; 34(1):77-86. PubMed ID: 15773608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Featural versus configural face processing in a rare genetic disorder: Williams syndrome.
    Isaac L; Lincoln A
    J Intellect Disabil Res; 2011 Nov; 55(11):1034-42. PubMed ID: 21554469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evidence of a shift from featural to configural face processing in infancy.
    Schwarzer G; Zauner N; Jovanovic B
    Dev Sci; 2007 Jul; 10(4):452-63. PubMed ID: 17552935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tolerance to spatial-relational transformations in unfamiliar faces: A further challenge to a configural processing account of identity recognition.
    Lorenzino M; Caminati M; Caudek C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Jul; 188():25-38. PubMed ID: 29807303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Learning from humans: computational modeling of face recognition.
    Wallraven C; Schwaninger A; Bülthoff HH
    Network; 2005 Dec; 16(4):401-18. PubMed ID: 16611592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Configural but Not Featural Face Information Is Associated With Automatic Processing.
    Wang H; Chen E; Li J; Ji F; Lian Y; Fu S
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2022; 16():884823. PubMed ID: 35496070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Face-specific configural processing of relational information.
    Leder H; Carbon CC
    Br J Psychol; 2006 Feb; 97(Pt 1):19-29. PubMed ID: 16464285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.